[mazza]

Bravo Ron! I love the guy

[elizabetty]

Why is it he keeps voting against making it a crime to transport minors across state lines for an abortion?

[MichiganConservative]

Golly, if Roe vs Wade were overturned, abortion would become a state issue, just like other forms of homicide.

[Rudder]

BS! He could have done this since his first day in Congress. He could bring up a bill tomorrow morning. Has he ever introduced a bill to repeal R vs W? No.

Pandering to one-issue voters won't get him the nomination.

[SunkenCiv]

Ron Paul’s $400 Million Earmarks
(shrimps are in the constitution?)
FOX News | 8/8/07 | Brit Hume
Posted on 08/08/2007 6:43:04 PM PDT by LdSentinal
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1878477/posts

[NavVet]

I’ll wait for a pro-life candidate that isn’t crazy.

[mountainbunny]

Ron Paul Repeats Commitment to Overturning Roe v. Wade

And if he had a snowball's chance of ever getting elected, that might possibly mean something. Since he doesn't, though, it doesn't.

[weegee]

How does the president overturn Roe V. Wade? Change the judges on the Supreme Court? And then you’d still need a relevant case to make its way to the SC which is entirely out of the hands of the President. Better to push for a Constitutional Amendment to protect life, prohibit cloning and fetal harvesting, and prohibit genetic discrimination in employment and insurance.

[John Leland 1789]

Mr. Paul may have positions on some things with which I disagree. But this one area, the area of a commitment to overturn the slaughter of abortion, helps bolster my respect for him. Even if not elected, he will have helped many to take a much strong stand.

The practice of abortion in this country affects the nation’s blessings and its future in a most negative way.

[George W. Bush]

	Ron's weekly message [5 minutes audio, every Monday] • Podcast • Weekly archive • Toll-free 888-322-1414 •
	Free Republic Ron Paul Ping List: Join/Leave

Ron Paul pro-life ping

[BlackElk]

If all paleoPaulie wants to DO about abortion is hold press conferences and overturn Roe vs. Wade (a necessary first step in any event) all he will accomplish is to send the matter back to the states where New York, California and a handful of other states will (under "state's rights" theories) guarantee that most abortions will still occur. If paleoPaulie can play the constitutional two-step by cramming unconstitutional earmark after unconstitutional earmark for his constituents into appropriations bills which he then hypocritically votes against with his pseudo"constitutionalist" dainty little pinky in the air, then he can do more than punt to the states on the very lives of the unborn innocent.

Protecting the babies from being sliced, diced and hamburgerized (which can be done by defining them as "persons" under the 14th Amendment and thereby prohibiting state denial of Equal Protection of the Laws under actual laws passed by Congress which is authorized by the 14th Amendment to do so) is a LOT more important than federal subsidies to the shrimping industry in Galveston and to Galveston trolleys and to Galveston local buses and to Galveston infrastructure and to other paleoPaulie pork projects and more important by far than Scarlett O'Paulie's pose of constitutionalist "virginity."

[Beckwith]

The president hasn’t the power to overturn Roe v. Wade.

[davidosborne]

No doubt Ron Paul IS pro-life.. which makes him a valued member of congress on this issue.. however his view on the war on terror makes him UNFIT to be Commander in Chief ..

REF: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6Hu3SQPxDI

In my humble opinion of course.... the ONLY candidate for President that is a TRUE Ronald Reagan conservative across the board is Duncan Hunter.. again in my humble opinion..

[BibChr]

“Ron Paul Repeats Commitment to Overturning Roe v. Wade”

Yeah, me too.

Now class: what do my commitment and Paul’s have in common?

Class?

Anyone?

Bueller?

[EternalVigilance]

Unfortunately, if you dig deep enough, and think, you’ll discover that, like a number of these Republican candidates, Dr. Paul takes a Stephen Douglas-like position vis a vis abortion. In other words, he mistakenly believes that abortion is a states’ rights question, not one of God-given unalienable rights for all, in all of America. Sad.

[Tim Long]

Having authored two books against Roe and a bill that would have abolished it, Dr. Paul has already done more against the murder of the preborn than all of the post-Roe presidents.

[MEGoody]

Now if he would only get his head out of his butt on Iraq.