Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Failing UNIFIL
contentions ^ | 8.8.2007 | James Kirchick

Posted on 08/08/2007 9:51:31 AM PDT by Contentions

Noah Pollak of Azure has an informative summary of the problems with UNIFIL, the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon, whose ostensible mission is the disarmament of Hizballah and the pacification of southern Lebanon. UNIFIL was expanded to 14,000 troops last summer, but, as Pollak writes:

"The new UNIFIL has of course done nothing. Actually, worse than nothing: In the year since the end of the war, Iran and Syria have been rearming Hizballah at a torrid pace, this time with better weaponry than before, and UNIFIL has barely even pretended to be interested in disrupting the arms flow. UNIFIL’s rules of engagement prevent the border with Syria from being patrolled, and UNIFIL blue-helmets have neither the desire nor the means to confront Hizballah."

UNIFIL is but one of many of the United Nations’ failed efforts around the world—which do not need to be elaborated upon for readers of COMMENTARY. But the gravest failure among the U.N.’s initiatives in the Middle East has to be UNRWA, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East, which for over five decades has kept the Palestinians in perpetual refugeehood when the vast majority of those Palestinians deemed “refugees” (the children and grandchildren of those who were displaced by the 1948 war) would not actually classify as such by the United Nations’ very own definition.

(Excerpt) Read more at commentarymagazine.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: commentary; contentions; jameskirchick; lebanon

1 posted on 08/08/2007 9:51:34 AM PDT by Contentions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Contentions

The UN’s entire purpose in Lebanon is to act as human shields for Hizb-allah to hide behind as they continue their jihad.


2 posted on 08/08/2007 9:54:35 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Contentions

I pray that the Israelis rid themselves of the pacifist appeasers before it is too late. They should have taken Syria on last summer, failure to do so has emboldened both Syria and Iran. Mr. Olmert, the Persians are at the gate, do not allow Israel to go the way of the 300. Brave and fearsome as they were they in the end succumbed to overwhelming forces.


3 posted on 08/08/2007 9:57:31 AM PDT by Camel Joe (liberal=socialist=royalist/imperialist pawn=enemy of Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Contentions

Now, doesn’t everyone have high hopes for Darfur’s future.

The UN is a major negative force on the face of planet earth.


4 posted on 08/08/2007 10:08:14 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking it's heritage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Contentions

UNIFIL won’t do what is required to stop the terrorists from getting weapons. That would require taking action the nations participating in UNIFIL won’t dare take.

The Israelis operate as a conventional military. Uniformed, marked vehicles etc. As a consequence, all you’ll hear from UNIFIL forces is Israeli incursions, since those are visible, all awhile terrorists are arming themselves right under their nose.

UNIFIL de facto becomes a worthless force that acts as a sort of shield protecting those operating from the areas they are supposed to control since these elements are asymmetric. UNIFIL will however complain about Israeli military operations that are required since they are to “impotent” to take the needed action to really make difference. If UNIFIL took action the consequence would be car bombs, mortar attacks, drive by shootings against the ground troops there. The situation would become truly dangerous for the blue helmets. The Germans are the perfect example of the problem over all with UNIFIL and many other so called peace enforcement and UN missions. What are two German navy ships going to do to help in this area? This is a ground campaign and the arms smuggled into Lebanon are coming in over land from Syria. However, what risk does Germany have of loosing troops on their ships in the Mediterranean out of missile range? What real commitment have they made that will make any difference? Even the ground component, while exposure is higher is toothless.


5 posted on 08/08/2007 10:20:03 AM PDT by Red6 (Come and take it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

The UN are the greatest alliance of criminals, terrorists and tyrants. The UN are a disease.


6 posted on 08/08/2007 10:21:56 AM PDT by SolidWood (UN delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

One of the surest signs that your government is in serious trouble, is when it acts as if the UN is worthwhile.

Knowing what we do today, it’s impossible to say the UN simply has a few problems. No, it’s corrupt from top to bottom and anyone dealing with it has dirty hands by definition.

I agree with your take.


7 posted on 08/08/2007 10:29:35 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking it's heritage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson