Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Army Says Soldier’s Articles for Magazine Were False
The New York Times ^ | August 8, 2007 | PATRICIA COHEN

Posted on 08/07/2007 6:42:31 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

An Army investigation into the Baghdad Diarist, a soldier in Iraq who wrote anonymous columns for The New Republic, has concluded that the sometimes shockingly cruel reports were false.

“We are not going into the details of the investigation,” Maj. Steven F. Lamb, deputy public affairs officer in Baghdad, wrote in an e-mail message. “The allegations are false, his platoon and company were interviewed, and no one could substantiate the claims he made.”

The brief statement, however, left many questions unanswered. Just last week The New Republic published on its Web site the results of its own investigation, stating that five members of the same company as Pvt. Scott Thomas Beauchamp, who had written the anonymous pieces, “all corroborated Beauchamp’s anecdotes, which they witnessed or, in the case of one soldier, heard about contemporaneously. (All of the soldiers we interviewed who had first-hand knowledge of the episodes requested anonymity.)”

Private Beauchamp had revealed his identity after The Weekly Standard online and conservative bloggers expressed doubts about their veracity. As the Baghdad Diarist, he wrote that one soldier had jokingly worn the remnant of a child’s skull on his head. In another issue, he said he and a soldier had mocked a terribly disfigured woman sitting near them in the mess tent. Franklin Foer, editor of The New Republic said that after Private Beauchamp revealed his identity, the Army severely curtailed his telephone and e-mail privileges.

Private Beauchamp is married to a reporter-researcher at the magazine, Elspeth Reeve.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: beauchamp; iraq; scottthomas; tnr; usarmy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
Michael Goldfarb, the online editor at The Weekly Standard who had initially raised doubt about the columns, wrote yesterday that The Standard had learned from a source close to the Army investigation that Private Beauchamp “signed a sworn statement admitting that all three articles he published in The New Republic were exaggerations and falsehoods — fabrications containing only ‘a smidgen of truth,’ in the words of our source.”
1 posted on 08/07/2007 6:42:35 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The brief statement, however, left many questions unanswered.

Yeah, keep hoping.

2 posted on 08/07/2007 6:43:46 PM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Someone who does this ought to be prosecuted for treason.


3 posted on 08/07/2007 6:44:47 PM PDT by pnh102
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Private Beauchamp is married to a reporter-researcher at the magazine, Elspeth Reeve.

For now. He's no longer useful, so my money says she dumps him.

4 posted on 08/07/2007 6:44:47 PM PDT by Doctor Raoul (What's the difference between the CIA and the Free Clinic? The Free Clinic knows how to stop leaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Beauchamp Recants
5 posted on 08/07/2007 6:45:01 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

The NYT is sad.


6 posted on 08/07/2007 6:46:22 PM PDT by NewHampshireDuo (Earth - Taking care of itself since 4.6 billion BC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative; Marine_Uncle; PajamaTruthMafia; Allegra; NormsRevenge; Grampa Dave; ...

sorry for the double pings


7 posted on 08/07/2007 6:47:09 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Granddaughters!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

“five members of the same company”

Let me guess...five e-mail identities of Pvt. Beauchamp himself.

Dibs on that one!


8 posted on 08/07/2007 6:47:51 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Beauchamp and TNR both caught in the act of Anonymous Sedition.
9 posted on 08/07/2007 6:48:03 PM PDT by Shqipo (We win now or darkness reigns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pnh102

criminal libel is Article 134, UCMJ


10 posted on 08/07/2007 6:50:06 PM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Foer said, ...“We hope the military will share what it has learned so that we can resolve this discrepancy.”

All he has to do is read the first line of this article. The Army found the claims were false. Period.

11 posted on 08/07/2007 6:51:11 PM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68
criminal libel is Article 134, UCMJ

Thanks for pointing this out. Now if only the misguided higher-ups in the military would stop wasting time persecuting good soldiers for doing their jobs, and instead go after these scumbags who defame our troops and the USA in general, we might make some headway.

12 posted on 08/07/2007 6:52:54 PM PDT by pnh102
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
IMAGINE THIS WERE A FOX NEWS CORRESPONDENT!

Oh, my God...the coverage would be non-stop on the networks.

13 posted on 08/07/2007 6:53:21 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul
One has to question why this so-called new media did not mention, up front that the supposed soldier was married to one of their employees. The answer is quite simple. In there hysterical zeal to give a negative story, little did they think about sane people questioning their idiotic sounding report and publication. TNR needs to be shut down as a crack-pot and reckless source of disinformation. It appears TNR wants to take this one to the grave, which is fine by me. The sooner this piece of garbage takes a dirt-nap, the better off America will be
14 posted on 08/07/2007 6:54:00 PM PDT by AlphaOneAlpha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul

Now that is just cruel ,,,, /s


15 posted on 08/07/2007 6:55:49 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Granddaughters!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

The New York Slimes is bending over so far to believe this lying POS — they’ve finally exposed their own lying ass as disinterested in the truth and despising the military and it mission.

The defense of the Republic...


16 posted on 08/07/2007 6:58:18 PM PDT by river rat (Semper Fi - You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
“We are not going into the details of the investigation,” Maj. Steven F. Lamb, deputy public affairs officer in Baghdad, wrote in an e-mail message. “The allegations are false, his platoon and company were interviewed, and no one could substantiate the claims he made.”

Never mind the fact that a lot of the sewage he was supposedly recording in his journal was written while he was waiting for his deployment to Iraq.

Yeah, the war turned him into a monster alright. Apparently he can't even think about Iraq without imagining all sorts of atrocities he could witness.

What a sick individual.

17 posted on 08/07/2007 6:58:47 PM PDT by Shelayne (I will continue to pray for President Bush and my country, as I am commanded to do by my Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dighton

The New York Times Lies, again.

Here is the quote directly from The New Republic:

—When we called Army spokesman Major Steven F. Lamb and asked about an
anonymously sourced allegation that Beauchamp had recanted his articles
in a sworn statement, he told us, “I have no knowledge of that.”—

Here is the Times Version:

==Yesterday, The New Republic posted another note on its Web site saying
its editors had spoken to Major Lamb and asked whether Private Beauchamp
had indeed signed a statement admitting to fabrications. “He told us,
‘I have no knowledge of that.’—


18 posted on 08/07/2007 7:01:03 PM PDT by plangent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

What are the idiots in The New Republic going to do now? I bet they will circle the wagons the way liberals do when they get caught in lies and they are now used to it because they are caught lying 24/7.


19 posted on 08/07/2007 7:04:11 PM PDT by jveritas (God bless our brave troops and President Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68
UCMJ - Article 134

934. ART. 134. GENERAL ARTICLE

Though not specifically mentioned in this chapter, all disorders and neglects to the prejudice of good order and discipline in the armed forces, all conduct of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces, and crimes and offenses not capital, of which persons subject to this chapter may be guilty, shall be taken cognizance of by a general, special or summary court-martial, according to the nature and degree of the offense, and shall be punished at the discretion of that court.

Sounds like that'll work!
However - I'd bet even money the guy will escape Leavenworth.

20 posted on 08/07/2007 7:07:39 PM PDT by river rat (Semper Fi - You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson