Posted on 08/06/2007 5:27:16 PM PDT by BGHater
Children find food in McDonald's packaging up to six times more appetising than the identical snacks in plain wrappers, research shows.
The study, designed to gauge the power of advertising, revealed that boys and girls as young as three found food tastier when they thought it was made by a big brand.
The phenomenon is not just restricted to fast foods, with youngsters finding that milk and carrots tastier when they believed they had been bought at McDonald's.
The research, carried at Stanford University in the US, comes amid growing concern about the influence of advertising on children's health.
Child obesity rates have trebled over the last 20 years, with 10 per cent of six-year-olds and 17 per cent of 15-year-olds now obese.
By 2050, half of all primary school-age boys and a fifth of girls could be so overweight that their health is at serious risk.
Experts have warned that unless the Government acts now, an entire generation faces an old age blighted by heart disease, cancer, diabetes and other diseases brought on by obesity, with today's children dying at a younger age than their parents.
Since April, junk food manufacturers have been banned from advertising their products during TV programmes targeted at under-16s.
However, critics claim the ban doesn't go far enough and point out that manufacturers are increasingly advertising on the internet.
Scroll down for more
Now, research shows just how powerful advertising is.
During the study, the researchers asked children aged between three and five to rate five foods for tastiness.
Each child was given two samples of each food, one in McDonalds packaging and one in plain wrapping. Other than the packaging, the samples were identical.
The researchers said that if the children weren't influenced by branding, they would find both samples equally tasty.
However, this was far from the case, with the McDonald's-wrapped food judged far more appealing.
The 'McDonald's' fries were judged tastiest by six times as many children as found the plain packaged chips the most appetising.
Chips and chicken nuggets carrying fast food branding were also deemed more tasty.
Even milk and carrots, foods not traditionally associated with McDonald's, were gauged more appealing when carrying the chain's logo.
Further analysis showed that the link was strongest among children who ate fast food more often and among those with more than one TV set at home.
Writing in the journal Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, the researchers said that previous studies had shown that children as young as two are aware of brands.
They added: "These results add evidence to support recommendations to regulate or ban advertising of the marketing of high-calorie, low-nutrient foods and beverages, or all marketing that is directed to young children."
Clever branding could also be used to encourage children to eat fruit and vegetables.
The researchers said: "Our findings also suggest a need for research on marketing in general, and branding in particular, as strategies to promote more healthful taste preferences and food and beverage choices in young children."
Tam Fry, of the Child Growth Foundation said the study underlined the importance of teaching even the youngest children about healthy eating.
He added: "Gaudy, colourful packaging is tremendously attractive, and if we could do the same with broccoli, it would be wonderful."
McDonald's said it actively tries to promote healthy food to children.
As I began to read this, I was suffering from a bad case of cognitive dissonance until I realized the headline says ‘tastier,’ not ‘nastier.’
Now they are gonna fire the McDonald’s marketing manager ‘cause it wasn’t 12 times tastier.
LOL! Count me in on this one as well. Love my MickeyD’s!
In other focus group news, grateful souls in the Sudan and Zimbabwe find available food more useful than hypothetical placebo food provided by the United Nations.
Their advertising is very good. The first landmark my son recognized by name was the McDonalds golden arches.
McDonald’s is one very sucessful business.
Which makes it, of course, a target for leftist/liberals. The left hates sucessful businesses and feels that they should pay more in quasi=taxes, obtained through lawsuits or special discriminatory laws aimed at a specific business.
Any mother/grandmother with a child knows that McDonald’s tempts and teases you via your child. Duh. My granddaughter knew McDonalds before she was two years of age.
It’s up to the parents to choose their children’s food and parents aren’t stupid. And yet no child has died yet from eating at McDonalds.
Water out of an empty coke can tastes better than water out of a glass.
Key word: yet.
I can understand, a child's reaction to the familiar, friendly and popular associations of McDonald's foods/treats.
More the mystery and more importantly. . .is why so many, supposedly, reason-capable adults share the same measure of a child's gullibility.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.