Skip to comments.
Stare Decisis: Not Quite What Senator Schumer Would Have You Believe
American Thinker ^
| August 06, 2007
| Clarice Feldman
Posted on 08/05/2007 11:53:01 PM PDT by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
To: neverdem
Liberal: someone who can ‘find’ a ‘right’ to abortion in the Constitution, but can’t find a right to bear arms.
To: Congressman Billybob
Supreme Court info: I didn’t know that the court overruled itself in that many decisions in that short a period of time.
22
posted on
08/06/2007 4:17:38 AM PDT
by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: neverdem
23
posted on
08/06/2007 4:29:31 AM PDT
by
Chuck54
To: neverdem
Good post...let “Pink Chuckie” put that in his pipe and smoke it!! Schumer is an absolute Disgrace to NY, a Disgrace to the Senate, and a Disgrace to America.
To: neverdem
If Schumer said that the sky is blue and the Sun rises in the East, I’d have to see those things happen. I simply don’t believe anything said by that evil SOB.
To: JohnLongIsland
re; #16 EXCEPT the other Senator from New York. It's a toss up between the two.
To: JohnLongIsland
re; #16 EXCEPT the other Senator from New York. It's a toss up between the two.
To: neverdem
Oh, let’s find some latin term for
“THE ONLY THING THAT SHOULD NEVER CHANGE IS THE ‘RIGHT’ TO KILL THE UNBORN, AT ANY TIME, FOR ANY REASON, INCLUDING WANTING TO GO TO A CONCERT.”
Other than that, the left doesn’t give 2 bits for “precendent”.
28
posted on
08/06/2007 12:31:29 PM PDT
by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
To: MrB
ok, “precedent” - my fingers got over excited there.
29
posted on
08/06/2007 12:32:24 PM PDT
by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
To: neverdem
According to stare decisis the Dred Scott decision would still be valid. It's just another excuse by the left for what's mine is mine, and what's yours is negotiable.
30
posted on
08/06/2007 2:17:14 PM PDT
by
Rummyfan
(Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
To: neverdem
Very interesting piece. It helps those of us who are not familiar with the workings of the Supremes, with regard to ‘precedents’, understand what the Democrats are doing, and how the MSM is helping them. I’ll have some ammo, in the future, when I hear folks parroting the media line, as pushed by the Dems.
31
posted on
08/06/2007 3:20:56 PM PDT
by
SuziQ
To: Lancey Howard
A simplified way to demonstrate the folly of "stare decisis" would be to list the hundreds of times that the Supreme Court has reversed itself.Exactly! 'Dred Scott' is the perfect example!
32
posted on
08/06/2007 3:22:09 PM PDT
by
SuziQ
To: Turret Gunner A20
schmuckie is so bad that if the beast ran against him in an election i’d volunteer for her campaign. lens lice is in a class by himself.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson