A Big Problem For Democrats (Joseph Farah On Democrats' Defeatism Alert)

Worldnetdaily.com ^ | 08/06/2007 | Joseph Farah

[goldstategop]

I don't know if this is a precipice from which there is any return for the party of Pelosi and Reid. These are turncoats in the truest form of the word. These are people who are secretly – and, now, not so secretly – praying for, hoping for and acting in the best interests of victory for Osama bin Laden and his cohorts who would chop off their heads just as fast as they would chop off yours and mine.

Imagine political power meaning so much to you that you would sell out your own country – perhaps even the very lives of your children and grandchildren – to retain it, consolidate it, expand it.

That's what it is all about with the party of Pelosi and Reid. It's not about ideology. It's not that they like al-Qaida or Islamo-fascism. But they do have enough disrespect for their nation that they would tolerate – even welcome – more death, more carnage, more crisis, more Sept. 11s.

I fear for our nation's future.

[goldstategop]

Party Of Treason Exposed Bump

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

[Steely Tom]

Whom the gods destroy, they first make mad.

[jazusamo]

Farah nailed it, good post.

[rockinqsranch]

These Democrats today are the children of the Dr. Spock 1960’s. The World was them, only them, and still is.

[Brad from Tennessee]

[. . . with a corrupt, megalomanical president fighting a war with no intention of winning. . .]

Nixon worked with what he inherited from LBJ. With his campaigns into NVA sanctuaries in Laos and Cambodia and the strategic bombing campaigns on Hanoi and Haiphong, Nixon waged a more intense, precise war. He also insinuated through diplomatic back channels that he could be forced to use nuclear weapons on North Vietnam. The North finally came to the peace table and stayed until an agreement was signed. After the bulk of US forces were withdrawn the South Vietnamese Army was able to beat back two major, bloody offensives from the North. Then Watergate removed Nixon and Congress cut off all funding and military assistance to RVN. The rest is sad history.

A student of popular history and the MSM would call Nixon a "corrupt megalomaniac." The real history is more complex:

http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20051101faessay84604/melvin-r-laird/iraq-learning-the-lessons-of-vietnam.html

[Brad from Tennessee]

[. . . with a corrupt, megalomanical president fighting a war with no intention of winning. . .]

Nixon worked with what he inherited from LBJ. With his campaigns into NVA sanctuaries in Laos and Cambodia and the strategic bombing campaigns on Hanoi and Haiphong, Nixon waged a more intense, precise war. He also insinuated through diplomatic back channels that he could be forced to use nuclear weapons on North Vietnam. The North finally came to the peace table and stayed until an agreement was signed. After the bulk of US forces were withdrawn the South Vietnamese Army was able to beat back two major, bloody offensives from the North. Then Watergate removed Nixon and Congress cut off all funding and military assistance to RVN. The rest is sad history.

A student of popular history and the MSM would call Nixon a "corrupt megalomaniac." The real history is more complex:

http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20051101faessay84604/melvin-r-laird/iraq-learning-the-lessons-of-vietnam.html

[Brad from Tennessee]

Sorry for the double post.

[Enchante]

"That's why this admission from Clyburn, this confirmation of what we suspected all along about the Democrats, is so significant. The worst news Democrats could hear is that the forces of good are triumphing in Iraq."

I've kept my tagline the same for quite awhile now, because this is the most important issue in our political system right now -- we have a whole generation of MSM and Demagogues who have developed a powerful interest in our defeat in Iraq. They are Defeatocrats through and through. Yes, they want to see disaster in Iraq because they think it will help them politically. If/when enough of the public becomes convinced that the 'surge' is the correct course and is working, the political crisis for the Defeatocrats will become acute, and they will become ever more desperate.

[goldstategop]

What kind of political party do we have that can benefit politically only if their country loses abroad? The Democrats have twisted themselves into a pretzel and they don't know the way back to sanity. Just ask H. Barack Obama.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

[MHGinTN]

It was worth it, Brad.

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

First:

*************************************

There is a book (now available in paperback ):

***********************

Unholy Alliance: Radical Islam and the American Left
(Hardcover)
by David Horowitz

********************************************************

And reviews:

****************************************

Editorial Reviews

Rich Lowry, Editor National Review

David Horowitz is synonymous with pyrotechnics. A historian and polemicist of the first order, he is paid the ultimate compliment --This text refers to the Hardcover edition.

Davis Hanson, Author, Ripples of Battle

An original look at those who want us to fail in the Middle East, both at home and abroad. The --This text refers to the Hardcover edition.

***********************************************************

See all Editorial Reviews

Fascinating Analysis of Leftist Goals, August 13, 2006

Reviewer: N. Sincerity - See all my reviews

A former 1960s radical, Horowitz is well-acquainted with the Leftist mindset. In this book, he strives to explain the modern alliance between left wing progressivists and radical Islamofascists. He argues that this alliance is based on a common desire to destroy Western capitalism. Leftist sympathy with Islamofascist ideas makes no sense from an intellectual point of view, given that countries ruled by radical Islamists are among the most racist, sexist, theocratic states in the world today. However, Leftists have recognized that they can benefit politically from destructive terrorist attacks on the Western world. A West under attack can be made to turn on its leaders in fear and desperation (as they did in Spain after the Madrid train bombings). Only once people reject current government structures can the Left execute its anti-capitalist revolution and build a new reality that mirrors the Leftist view of utopia.

The complete and utter idealogical hypocrisy of the Islamofascist-Leftist alliance is distressing, but as Horowitz reminds us,

Leftists radicals truly believe the ends justify the means.

***************************************

**************************************

********************************************

And there is this:

Terrorists in Their Own Words -(A compilation drawn from translations ......)

**************************Intro******************************

Islamist terrorists have long been at war with the United States and frequently have proclaimed their determination to win the war. In fact, they see their enemies' unwillingness to acknowledge this war as an act of cowardice. If their enemies refuse to wear the mantle of warrior, terrorists assume that they are weak, lacking in honor, and spiritually infe­rior—and the notion that their enemy is vulnerable emboldens them. Failing to acknowledge that we are at war only encourages the enemy to be more warlike.

Conclusive proof that terrorists are at war with us requires little more than reading their own words. A compilation drawn from translations of a number of authoritative sources illustrates the nature of the challenge that America and its allies face and what needs to be done to combat it.

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

fyi

[SunkenCiv]

Imagine political power meaning so much to you that you would sell out your own country – perhaps even the very lives of your children and grandchildren – to retain it, consolidate it, expand it.

No need to imagine -- the Dhimmicrats are the Party of Treason.

[skimask]

Those idiots will do anything for power. They say Bush is more of a terrorist the OBL. The Internet has unleashed the most vile and hateful people the Democrat party has to offer. I suppose they were always out there but no one would listen to them. The Internet has given them a collective voice.

[no dems]

You know this; I know this and most folks on this website know this. The question is:
HOW DO WE CONVINCE THE VOTERS OF THIS BEFORE NOVEMBER '08?

[mkjessup]

There is an answer to this problem but it would unfortunately require more nerve than exists presently at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue:

Direct Attorney General Alberto VO5 to place the entire Democrat leadership under arrest for subverting the war effort, giving aid and comfort to our enemies, to encouraging the fifth column within our borders, and misappropriation of defense funding (can we say $150 million bucks to Yellow-Stain Murtha folks?).

And after placing said subversives under arrest, wait for the first squawks out of the New York Slimes and their America-hating brethren, and lock up those al Qaeda sympathizers too.

Send them all to Gitmo for the duration of the War.

Well, it was a nice thought anyway.

[jwh_Denver]

Nixon had no more intention of winning that war than LBJ did.

[jwh_Denver]

Nixon had no more intention of winning that war than LBJ did.

[Tut]

ping

Read the article.