Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trutheriness and Ron Paul (Michelle Malkin) [Ron Paul Says The Darnedest Things!]
Michelle Malkin ^ | May 19, 2007 | Michelle Malkin

Posted on 08/05/2007 5:34:39 PM PDT by Lovebloggers

CALLER: I want a complete, impartial, and totally independent investigation of the events of September 11, 2001 . I’m tired of this bogus garbage about terrorism. Ask Michael Meacher about how he feels about this bogus war on terrorism. Can you comment on that please?

HON. DR. RON PAUL: Well, that would be nice to have. Unfortunately, we don’t have that in place. IT WILL BE A LITTLE BIT BETTER NOW WITH THE DEMOCRATS NOW IN CHARGE OF OVERSIGHT. But you know, for top level policy there’s not a whole lot of difference between the two policies so a real investigation isn’t going to happen. But I think we have to keep pushing for it. And like you and others, we see the investigations that have been done so far as more or less cover-up and no real explanation of what went on.

(Excerpt) Read more at michellemalkin.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: asseenonstormfront; malkin; michellemalkin; paulbearers; paulestinians; paulistas; paultheloser; ronpaul; truthers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 601-620621-640641-660 ... 681-700 next last
To: SJackson
I've seen all kinds of complaints about the Diebold machines from the "selected not elected" crowd, none that convince me they're a part of a Republican conspiracy which is the charge. Do you have any legitimate complaints to raise? Do you think that's why Pat Buchanan lost in 1996?

Shorter SJackson: Accusations of vote fraud are crazy...except when my guy loses.

621 posted on 08/06/2007 4:57:19 PM PDT by JTN ("I came here to kick ass and chew bubble gum. And I'm all out of bubble gum.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 617 | View Replies]

To: Lovebloggers
Is he returning their money?

Who cares?

622 posted on 08/06/2007 4:59:18 PM PDT by JTN ("I came here to kick ass and chew bubble gum. And I'm all out of bubble gum.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 620 | View Replies]

To: JTN

Certainly not Ron Paul.


623 posted on 08/06/2007 4:59:58 PM PDT by Lovebloggers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 622 | View Replies]

To: JTN
Shorter SJackson: Accusations of vote fraud are crazy...except when my guy loses.

No, accusations of vote fraud are crazy when not supported.

Vote fraud is a crime you know. So it's a serious charge, one that should be supportable in some manner.

If the Paul supporters have a credible reason to believe Diebold will be engaging in vote fraud in Iowa, they need to bring the matter to the attention of the authorities immediately.

Barring that, it's just another bit of left wing lunacy a segment of his supporters buy into.

624 posted on 08/06/2007 5:01:30 PM PDT by SJackson (isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 621 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
So Ron Paul will purge the Republican Party not only of the evil neocons, but the commies and socialists as well.

After re-reading my post I can see where you got the wrong idea. I was referring to the commies and socialists in the DEMOCRATIC PARTY like Comrade Hillary Clinton, Mullah Muhammed Barack Obama and Madame John Edwards. They are SOCIALISTS. PURE SOCIALISTS.

As much as we have our recent differences with our French friends prior to Sarkozy's election, at least we can agree that they are smart enough and honest enough to call their left wing candidates what they are...SOCIALISTS.

Sorry for the misunderstanding. I hope this clarifies things. We have only a few closet Socialists like Olympia Snowe to go to rid the party of the fetid breath of tyranny. King Bloomberg (if he's a right wing "Republican" than I'm John the Baptist) has already removed his own puss filled pimple off of the ass of freedom known as conservatism/libertarianism. It's much easier when the garbage takes itself out.

625 posted on 08/06/2007 5:05:43 PM PDT by Eric Blair 2084 (Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms shouldn't be a federal agency...it should be a convenience store.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 618 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
No, accusations of vote fraud are crazy when not supported. Vote fraud is a crime you know. So it's a serious charge, one that should be supportable in some manner.

Well, you can relax, because there were no accusations of vote fraud. There was a press release trying to raise awareness of the potential for vote fraud, so that supporters could show up to look for evidence of it, but no accusations of the actual thing.

If the Paul supporters have a credible reason to believe Diebold will be engaging in vote fraud in Iowa, they need to bring the matter to the attention of the authorities immediately.

If actual evidence is found, I'm sure that will happen.

Barring that, it's just another bit of left wing lunacy a segment of his supporters buy into.

More like a lack of reading comprehension.

626 posted on 08/06/2007 5:10:57 PM PDT by JTN ("I came here to kick ass and chew bubble gum. And I'm all out of bubble gum.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 624 | View Replies]

To: Eric Blair 2084

Well, also I have younger ones who aren’t allowed to watch it, but it is hard to shield them from it when it is on. The younger ones do think cartoons are cartoons. Of course, they like the potty humor on SP — which I don’t care for. I would have been perfectly happy with the 9/11 conspiracy show w/o the urinal deuce.


627 posted on 08/06/2007 5:29:36 PM PDT by soccermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 589 | View Replies]

To: JTN
Right, just an accusation the the Diebold machines are easily hacked, easily rigged, and that poll watchers are needed to conduct an "exit poll", to assure that what happened to Pat Buchanan, fraud, doesn't happen again.

Nope, no fraud accusation at all.

Spin, spin, spin.

628 posted on 08/06/2007 5:30:08 PM PDT by SJackson (isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 626 | View Replies]

To: Eric Blair 2084
After re-reading my post I can see where you got the wrong idea. I was referring to the commies and socialists in the DEMOCRATIC PARTY

I suspected that, but Ron Paul won't be confronting them.

629 posted on 08/06/2007 5:30:51 PM PDT by SJackson (isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 625 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Right, just an accusation the the Diebold machines are easily hacked, easily rigged

Yes.

and that poll watchers are needed to conduct an "exit poll"

Uh huh.

to assure that what happened to Pat Buchanan, fraud, doesn't happen again.

Oh, and you were doing so well. Pat Buchanan wasn't mentioned in that release. In fact, no actual incidents of vote fraud were mentioned at all.

Spin, spin, spin.

No need. You're doing fine on your own.

630 posted on 08/06/2007 5:37:08 PM PDT by JTN ("I came here to kick ass and chew bubble gum. And I'm all out of bubble gum.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 628 | View Replies]

To: Lovebloggers

____________

EF - I’d like to turn your attention to propaganda, and state-sanctioned mind control. It is common knowledge that the CIA and military have conducted mind control experimentation on American citizens. The most notorious case was Project MK Ultra in which Goldwater sat in on the Senate Hearings against the accused. Each time these agencies have been caught performing experiments, they shrug it off and say the activity was done a few decades ago, and that they have subsisted. Yet, more evidence surfaces, and we become aware that the mind control projects went on at least until the eighties. Now, when we hear rumors that the government has abducted children or sponsored sex slavery, we don’t want to believe it, but we must not discard it because of the government’s past history. Do you believe that members of our government are still actively involved in individual mind control experimentation?

RP - Probably, but the tragedy is I don’t know. The tragedy is that I’m in the Congress, and even when those bills come up you can’t get much information. I would assume to some degree they are. You know, what is official and what is not official? Some of the CIA gets caught trading drugs and financing some corrupt regime, which they have been caught. That individual, “We don’t even know who you are, buddy.” They disown you. And, that’s why the CIA in particular is a very, very dangerous organization.

http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=90&contentid=1659&page=2

Dude — sex slavery, child abduction? Thank goodness the Democrats are in charge of oversight now.


631 posted on 08/06/2007 5:39:29 PM PDT by Lovebloggers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
I suspected that, but Ron Paul won't be confronting them.

That statement sort of cuts through the 545 other posts and gets to the heart of the matter doesn't it? Why do you (and I don't mean to pick on you but you just happen to be here) think that libertarians like me and Ron Paul who believe in limited government and free markets wouldn't, couldn't, shouldn't consider left wing Socialists their sworn enemies and not confront them?

If you want to resort to the lowest common denonminator of political discourse and bring up pot, weed, stoners etc. in order to avoid an intellectual argument than it is your constitutional right to plead the 5th Amendment and avoid prosecution. (I haven't touched that crap since the first Bush admin in 91, it never agreed with me)

There are indeed some similarities between liberals and libertarians. (for instance, hearing the words "penis" and "vagina" on the air doesn't offend either). But the differences are so broad and wide as to be irreconcilable. That's why you find libertarians here.

632 posted on 08/06/2007 5:49:06 PM PDT by Eric Blair 2084 (Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms shouldn't be a federal agency...it should be a convenience store.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 629 | View Replies]

To: Eric Blair 2084
He won't be confronting socialists in the Democratic Party because he hasn't a chance of winning the Republican nomination.

I didn't bring up pot, weeds, or stoners, or penis or vagina, or the 5th amendment, or any of the things you mention in your post.

I did bring up truthers, racists, and antisemites. The last two are evil imo, the first a bit off.

Ron Paul is more than welcome to confront the socialists in the Democratic Party as a Libertarian or a 3rd party candidate.

IMO, he won't be doing it as a Republican.

633 posted on 08/06/2007 5:55:52 PM PDT by SJackson (isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 632 | View Replies]

To: JTN
Oh, and you were doing so well. Pat Buchanan wasn't mentioned in that release. In fact, no actual incidents of vote fraud were mentioned at all.

Oh no, he wasn't.

No, No, No, No, No, Pat wasn't mentioned, was vote fraud.

Take it slow, I know it's difficult, read the release. It says (my bold)

- one tells what happened at the Ames Straw Poll in 1995. One (A House without Doors) tells about the proven vote fraud against Pat Buchanan in the 1996 Iowa Presidential Caucuses, and how it was done. See you in Ames? (Letter slightly edited.)

Good grief, at least read before you post.

634 posted on 08/06/2007 5:59:14 PM PDT by SJackson (isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 630 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Good grief, at least read before you post.

Fair enough. I skimmed and got busted. Not that it matters at any rate. The point is, you're trying to claim that Paul supporters are preemptively crying "vote fraud" in the upcoming straw poll. That's not happening.

635 posted on 08/06/2007 6:07:19 PM PDT by JTN ("I came here to kick ass and chew bubble gum. And I'm all out of bubble gum.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 634 | View Replies]

To: CenTexConfederate

Interesting — GWB has a tagline about Iowa and youtube also. Why are you guys so fixated on those two aspects, which are least likely to be scientifically representative? Oh wait, I just answered my own question. Nevermind!


636 posted on 08/06/2007 7:16:56 PM PDT by soccermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 599 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

Eye-popping, isn’t it?


637 posted on 08/06/2007 7:17:34 PM PDT by soccermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 594 | View Replies]

To: soccermom

Because it’s the first Beauty contest. Build the big MO


638 posted on 08/06/2007 8:00:39 PM PDT by CenTexConfederate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 636 | View Replies]

To: CenTexConfederate

LOL! I don’t see how a straw poll — which is essentially comes down to whomever can stack his people there — means anything.


639 posted on 08/06/2007 8:28:20 PM PDT by soccermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 638 | View Replies]

To: soccermom

How old are you??


640 posted on 08/06/2007 8:38:13 PM PDT by CenTexConfederate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 639 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 601-620621-640641-660 ... 681-700 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson