Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eric Blair 2084
After re-reading my post I can see where you got the wrong idea. I was referring to the commies and socialists in the DEMOCRATIC PARTY

I suspected that, but Ron Paul won't be confronting them.

629 posted on 08/06/2007 5:30:51 PM PDT by SJackson (isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 625 | View Replies ]


To: SJackson
I suspected that, but Ron Paul won't be confronting them.

That statement sort of cuts through the 545 other posts and gets to the heart of the matter doesn't it? Why do you (and I don't mean to pick on you but you just happen to be here) think that libertarians like me and Ron Paul who believe in limited government and free markets wouldn't, couldn't, shouldn't consider left wing Socialists their sworn enemies and not confront them?

If you want to resort to the lowest common denonminator of political discourse and bring up pot, weed, stoners etc. in order to avoid an intellectual argument than it is your constitutional right to plead the 5th Amendment and avoid prosecution. (I haven't touched that crap since the first Bush admin in 91, it never agreed with me)

There are indeed some similarities between liberals and libertarians. (for instance, hearing the words "penis" and "vagina" on the air doesn't offend either). But the differences are so broad and wide as to be irreconcilable. That's why you find libertarians here.

632 posted on 08/06/2007 5:49:06 PM PDT by Eric Blair 2084 (Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms shouldn't be a federal agency...it should be a convenience store.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 629 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson