Posted on 08/05/2007 5:34:39 PM PDT by Lovebloggers
CALLER: I want a complete, impartial, and totally independent investigation of the events of September 11, 2001 . I’m tired of this bogus garbage about terrorism. Ask Michael Meacher about how he feels about this bogus war on terrorism. Can you comment on that please?
HON. DR. RON PAUL: Well, that would be nice to have. Unfortunately, we don’t have that in place. IT WILL BE A LITTLE BIT BETTER NOW WITH THE DEMOCRATS NOW IN CHARGE OF OVERSIGHT. But you know, for top level policy there’s not a whole lot of difference between the two policies so a real investigation isn’t going to happen. But I think we have to keep pushing for it. And like you and others, we see the investigations that have been done so far as more or less cover-up and no real explanation of what went on.
(Excerpt) Read more at michellemalkin.com ...
I could care less about courtesty to truthers. They only get contempt from me.
See her #412. And you still fail to ping her out of courtesy when you talk about her. You continue to mischaracterize her.
I’m aware of what Maeve posted.
I’m telling you that it’s rude to tell someone, “Well, you think (whatever).”
It is arrogant and presumptuous to tell someone what is in that person’s head. You don’t know what is in Maeve’s head any more than I do.
Ah - and now you revise your own post. Let's revisit it:
That 19 Muslim fanatics with boxcutters led by a man in a cave were able to outsmart the CIA, FBI, DIA and other agencies and then take hold of four passenger jets and that they were never intercepted by our own Air Force......
Seems pretty clear that you think al Qaeda needed to have large numbers of people in the CIA and FBI simply look the other way as they plotted - but now you claim that "aid not need have come from our own government." Oh, and BTW, bin Laden was not in a cave when 9-11 was plotted - he was a guest of the Taliban government. You sure spew the Truther talking points freely for someone who claims they are not a truther.
Well, it shows your own irrationality more than her “Trutherism.”
Ah, so I can no longer interpret someone's OWN WORDS in the Ron Paul parallel universe. Words mean whatever the Paulites deem them to mean, and that meaning can change as needed.
Gawd, GET A GRIP.
You continue to get more and more irrational.
Irrationality? Should I show courtesy to liberal slimeballs who attack our troops? Or to Congressional Democrats who try to undercut their mission?
Seems to me you need to work on your own sense of rationality.
A few questions for your little self serving soap box rant.
1) Ron Paul has been in Congress how long? Yet he is not corrupt, even though he too is a politician — and a Republican one to boot. He can be trusted to tell you what you want to hear and no more, and he sure has no problem sucking up to whatever crowd he is in front of, including the “truthers.” Of course he isn’t one and is amazed that he has been called one as he had no idea who Alex Jones was, or who is audience primarily is. Yeah we want that level of dumbass as CIC, absolutely.
2) It will be a little bit better now with the Democrats now in charge of oversight.... are you kidding me right now? There is absolutely no way that is acceptable at any level. You do know who the majority leaders are no? or did that little tidbit escape you as reality seems to have.
Your little comments about good and evil with regard to politics is too amusing as it is hypocrisy to the max with you “real conservatives.” Abolish the IRS, DOE, etc. — when we all know (well, those of us who live in the real world that is) that this has no shot in hell of ever passing. Political compromise is how things get done in Washington, and you attack GWB every chance you get because he does it. Yet it is Paul and only Paul who recognizes in the good in Democrats. Too.Dang.Funny.
3) We know what happened on 9/11 and leading up to it (something about a hick from Arkansas drawing lines in the sand up to the doors of the Twin Towers....). Aside from Able Danger (and honestly, I want that to be investigated to seal Billy-Jeff’s fate in History as the biggest POS CIC this country has ever had), we know what went wrong and where it went wrong. You need a refresher course on that sport you let us know and we will happily walk you down that path.
4) Historical conservatives? that I will laugh at for a good long while. America First Committee/Ron Paul — hmmm....I can’t tell the difference. [rolling eyes]
From the Paulite Parallel Universe, I'm quite sure that's the way it appears.
To those still on Planet Earth, we're just calling them as we see them. Such as using the meaning of words in the dictionary instead of the Humpty Dumpty verbal gymnastics of the Paulites.
Just Ron Paul playing to his audience as the dishonest opportunist politician he is.
The number "19" is significant for Islamic numerology and propaganda, but I am not convinced that the nineteen named are in fact the ones responsible. At least one person has come forward in Morrocco to claim he is very much alive in spite of being labled by our FBI as dead. The veracity of the claim is something to investigate. (The absence of full, independent inquests boggles my mind.) To what degree they were Wahabbi Muslim fanatics I don't know. They appear to have practiced Taqqiya while being here in the USA if they were Wahabbists. Did the identified terrorist pilots have the necessary skills to pull off such a plan? I don't know. I find it hard to believe that the one credited with the Pentagon was capable of flying in the fashion that is recorded and in light of his flight school instructors estimation of his skills.
Saying you “could care less” implies that you care. The saying you wish is that you “couldn’t care less.”
Just remember come next election season, YOU need US.
I’m waiting for her to answer my direct question, which I’ve posed at least twice.
Where is Maeve doing this? By her own admission, she has family members in the military.
You mean the one where Guiliani and McCain aren’t participating, and where Romney has backed away from?
That one?
Delusion please, one way ticket.
Nope. I think it likely to be much more intricate than that. Too many folk invoke Occam's Razor without considering Semitic thinking.
Man, you Paulites can be dense. I was drawing parallels - showing that your demand for courtsey was irrational by pointing out examples where it is not only not warranted, but absurd.
And I hold truthers in as deep contempt as well as antiwar, anti-troop liberals.
No, you can interpret all you want.
You just can’t attribute your interpretation to that person. You need to state your opinion AS your opinion.
Didn’t your mother teach you ANYTHING?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.