Posted on 08/05/2007 12:03:42 PM PDT by Freedom'sWorthIt
Called "No Survivors"
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
While it is not "scientific proof" it certainly is compelling evidence that over 200 independent witnesses from all over the the Long Island Sound are gave eye witness accounts of seeing a red streak come up from the surface towards the plane and culminating in a fireball. Those accounts when plotted on a map triangulate to a specific launch point which further bolsters their credibility. The NTSB supressed this evidence.
The suppresed eyewitness evidence certainly has more credence than the ridiculous, un-replicatable, center fuel tank theory.
No proof?
How about like a thousand people?
How about the laws of physics?
How about the Governments impossible scenorio explanation?
Conspiracy theory? No, alternate theory based upon fact versus fanciful theory based upon suspect computer modeling.
No proof?
How about like a thousand people?
How about the laws of physics?
How about the Governments impossible scenorio explanation?
Conspiracy theory? No, alternate theory based upon fact versus fanciful theory based upon suspect computer modeling.
The Boeing scenario is far safer, Jet A is far less likely to explode than gasoline.
Lol, my wife always screems when I fill my tank while the car is running.
I say, “Come one, when is the last time you ever heard of a car exploding because the engine was left running while fueling?”.
Yes that’s the one. CNN program was about one man whose sister died in TWA800 crash and, I think, his determination for all us airlines to be retrofitted with a new technology that will prevent more crashes like the one in which his siter died........by preventing more fuel tank explosions......I didn’t get to hear the entire program but basically it was another (fruitless) attempt to convince the American flying public that all those planes that have been falling out of the sky due to fuel tank explosions can be prevented if the stubborn American Air carriers would just bite the bullet and foot the billion dollar or so bill to upfit their planes.
Of course, there have been no more jets falling out of the sky from center fuel tank explosions....but don’t let the facts prevent you from swallowing this swill of garbage.
I was speaking broadly. Take a survey the next time you can on FR. I’m willing to wager a paperback copy of the Koran (tried to read it twice, and gave up, so it is in pretty good shape.) that the results will indicate a wide difference between conservatives and liberals on the points I raised.
Exactly.
Yes, actually, I saw that also. I also remember the moments immediately after TWA800 was brought down - and like others - the initial talk of all these eyewitnesses seeing the firey streak going up from the horizon and then the plane exploding - and it having to mean a missile struck that plane - transformed into FBI interviewers harrassing eyewitnesses to convince them they did not see what they all said they saw! Then that kangaroo court NTSB program in which the people present tried to convince the world that it was the central fuel tank and the frayed wires that did this deed - denying all the eyewitness reports from even being present to discuss what they saw - I will never forget that.
The old Soviet propaganda machine had nothing on the Clinton crime machine’s coverup/propaganda operation. And here it is 11 years later and they are STILL pushing the propaganda??? Still haven’t convinced the world yet, and surely have not convinced the people who should know - the people who fly millions of airline passengers around the world every day.
See Post #4.
Yes, I have seen similar data, especially expressed as an envelope of altitude and distance. If you are outside the envelope, the missile can’t reach you. So, this does weigh greatly against a MANPAD, but there are other missiles that would be capable.
Even so, just the attempt of an attack, even if it was made where the aircraft was outside the MANPAD’s operating envelope, would have a significant meaning both to the public’s perception of safety and to the necessity for a military response. Could the attack have been made closer to JFK where the aircraft would have been lower? I tend to think that making an attack in broad daylight where there would be lots of witnesses to the launch is the signal the jihadist wanted to send the Great Satan and if they actually succeeded at hitting the target, all the better.
Even so, the Clinton Administration decided to treat a jihadist attack as a crime and not as an act of war, thus adding to the evidence that lead to bin Laden deciding he could go ahead with 9/11 and the US would not respond.
Here we go! Somebody has to break out the “WACKO” label!
As predictable as champagne on New Years!
Hey, let’s not stop there! They must be racist, anti-semite nazi child molesters also
Thanks again - it helps to reread these accounts. OF course Clinton News Network would find no place for these reports ....hundreds of them. Instead they focus on this one poor guy who lost his sister and has bought off on the Clinton spouted kool aid. Sickening how the Clintonistas use the suffering of people to perpetuate myths and to try to prevent the truth from getting out there. Too bad CNN ...... you just look like the fools you are.
A lot of people claim that Kennedy was hit from the grassy knoll too.
This sounds just like the people who claim they were kept silence after the Kennedy Assassination.
.”...metorite or space junk”...yeah ..one vomited out of the earht up toward the jet...that’s the ticket!
.”...metorite or space junk”...yeah ..one vomited out of the earth up toward the jet...that’s the ticket!
The wife of one of my friends used to be a senior flight attendant for TWA and knew every crewmember who died that night. She has told me that there is a lot of information that has not been made public about the crash and that a number of people at TWA, herself included, have left the company because of the runaround they are receiving when they ask what happened that night that resulted in their friends dying.
You can try to trivialize over 200 independent witness who unknowingly corroborate each other's stories all you want, but it won't wash with me, nor many thousands of others.
So help me understand, who should I belevie? The two hundred plus people with no axe to grind who tell remarkably similar accounts of what happened, or the Government agency that buried those accounts and came up with a cock-a-maimie theory that they cannot demonstrate or replicate and has never happened before or since despite millions of potential opportunities?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.