Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Public Gay Sex - Is It Acceptable to You?
Concerned Women for America ^ | August 2, 2007 | Concerned Women for America

Posted on 08/02/2007 11:16:02 AM PDT by jimluke01

Opposing the illegal use of the city’s public restrooms for anonymous homosexual liaisons has landed Mayor Jim Naugle in the news and on the wrong side of radical homosexual activists. Despite the unrelenting pressure, Mayor Naugle is holding the line. Concerned Women for America (CWA) applauds Mayor Naugle's firm stand for families.

(Excerpt) Read more at cwfa.org ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fortlauderdale; homosexualagenda; jimnaugle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

1 posted on 08/02/2007 11:16:04 AM PDT by jimluke01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jimluke01

It is incredible that there is even a question on this. I do not support ANY public sex ...

We have truly become Sodom


2 posted on 08/02/2007 11:20:34 AM PDT by ears_to_hear (Pray for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ears_to_hear
Public sex is a basic human right.

The following message brought to you by Code Pink:
Money For Public Sex Not War.

3 posted on 08/02/2007 11:23:27 AM PDT by Doctor Raoul (What's the difference between the CIA and the Free Clinic? The Free Clinic knows how to stop leaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ears_to_hear

I thought a restroom was generally for doing #1 and/or #2. Just looking at the way they are designed, I think that is a fair assumption.


4 posted on 08/02/2007 11:24:14 AM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ears_to_hear

Use of the word, sodomites is considered hate speech by the fecal obsessionists. The marketers of deviance, aka Hollywood homos, have advanced civilization back to Roman times when the queers were allowed to sell, trade, and offer their young boys for the pleasure of others so inclined. We have NAMBLA today. Go to a homo pride parade if you want to see the disgusting display of this crowd of deviants; but be careful what you say, it might be a hate crime to oppose such disgusting public behavior.


5 posted on 08/02/2007 11:25:19 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jimluke01
Public Gay Sex - Is It Acceptable to You?

No.

6 posted on 08/02/2007 11:25:19 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (Fred Dalton Thompson for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimluke01

We are not ‘slouching towards Gommarah’, it’s more like an all out sprint.


7 posted on 08/02/2007 11:26:09 AM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ears_to_hear

My ex opposed private sex, too.


8 posted on 08/02/2007 11:26:25 AM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot

I think we should have a massive right-in campaign to get all the talk show hosts to call the liberals

REGRESSIVES

because of just th epoint you make. Have written a number of them myself.


9 posted on 08/02/2007 11:30:42 AM PDT by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jimluke01

Sex should be done in private, whether by gay or straight people. It’s not a spectator sport, for crying out loud!


10 posted on 08/02/2007 11:31:01 AM PDT by Old Grumpy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: jimluke01

Two guys? No.
Two (or more) girls? hell, yes!


12 posted on 08/02/2007 11:32:05 AM PDT by Revolting cat! (We all need someone we can bleed on...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimluke01

The only appropriate thing to do is tell them to ‘get a room!’


13 posted on 08/02/2007 11:32:18 AM PDT by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo Arabiam Esse Delendam -- Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan
No doubt why she's your ex.

TS
(*)making assumptions on the genders here

14 posted on 08/02/2007 11:32:34 AM PDT by Tanniker Smith (I didn't know she was a Liberal when I married her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jimluke01
When it comes to anonymous public sex, all I can say is: “That’s so gay!”
15 posted on 08/02/2007 11:33:28 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Progressives like to keep doing the things that didn't work in the past.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tanniker Smith

You guessed right, but I know more than just a few women whose exes weren’t interested in sex, either.


16 posted on 08/02/2007 11:34:42 AM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
Two guys? No. Two (or more) girls? hell, yes!

Assuming the lesbos look more like the ones on "The L Word" instead of like Rosie O'Donnell.

17 posted on 08/02/2007 11:36:04 AM PDT by dfwgator (The University of Florida - Still Championship U)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
Two (or more) girls? hell, yes!

Well, maybe not in a downtown park. On a college campus commons, maybe...

Plus, it depends on what the girls look like.

18 posted on 08/02/2007 11:36:06 AM PDT by Larry Lucido (Hunter 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Old Grumpy

MA State Police are no longer allowed to bust up Circle Jerks in the Rest Stops of MA highways. A judge ruled that public sex is part of Gay Culture. The men’s room on the 1st floor of my city hall also got five stars from a gay website.


19 posted on 08/02/2007 11:36:15 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ears_to_hear

Exactly! This is how gays try to ram their sexuality down everyones throat (for lack of a better term). Anyone who says they don`t support gay public sex is deemed a homophobe by the gays...This is what they do for parades, if they aren`t allowed to have a parade, then that town or city is deemed “anti-gay” or “homophobic”, but the point is there should not be ANY parade about ANY sexuality! What is the point? It`s ridiculous. Is there a “heterosexual day parade”? Sexuality is a private matter like taking a dump, the public does not need to hear about how someone does it. It`s just another example of liberals trying to control people, they just cannot accept that other people do not have the same beliefs as them.


20 posted on 08/02/2007 11:36:57 AM PDT by Screamname (Guinness world records reports that the record for youngest living person is constantly being broken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson