Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obamma says No Nukes under any circumstances
http://www.pr-inside.com/print193277.htm ^

Posted on 08/02/2007 11:05:56 AM PDT by ulm1

WASHINGTON (AP) - Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama said Thursday he would not use nuclear weapons «in any circumstance. «I think it would be a profound mistake for us to use nuclear weapons in any circumstance,» Obama said, with a pause, «involving civilians.» Then he quickly added, «Let me scratch that. There's been no discussion of nuclear weapons. That's not on the table.

(Excerpt) Read more at pr-inside.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: nationalinsecurity; nonukes; obama; obama2008; thenuclearquestion; unfit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last
To: ulm1

So what’s he going to do after he invades Pakistan and in retaliation the set a nuke off in the US-I guess he will just go to the UN and ask for a resolution condemning their action.


61 posted on 08/02/2007 1:34:23 PM PDT by mrmargaritaville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ulm1
Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama said Thursday he would not use nuclear weapons «in any circumstance.

Yep, we should just let all foreign invaders in. WTF does he think kept us safe during the entire cold war? WTF does he think is cool about giving your potential enemies all your defense strategies?

62 posted on 08/02/2007 1:35:53 PM PDT by Clam Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii
Hillary is going to shove that statement up his butt.

The thought of him NO using them when necesary is almost as scary as Hillary being in charge of using them.

63 posted on 08/02/2007 1:38:25 PM PDT by Clam Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jackv

He acts like he’s working for clinton.


64 posted on 08/02/2007 1:38:41 PM PDT by Unicorn (Too many wimps around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: ulm1

Just what we’d expect from a Muslim RAT! Terrorists hope he becomes President, because they know they’ll have one of “their own” who will enable them to destroy what Congress/Bush haven’t already destroyed!!


65 posted on 08/02/2007 1:39:22 PM PDT by NRA2BFree (THE TREE OF LIBERTY NEEDS TO BE WATERED FROM TIME TO TIME WITH THE BLOOD OF TYRANTS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ulm1

I’m starting to get flashbacks to the McGovern campaign. Obama would make a great candidate. ;-)


66 posted on 08/02/2007 1:43:43 PM PDT by popdonnelly (Our first responsibility is to keep the power of the Presidency out of the hands of the Clintons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ulm1

Given a choice between this lightweight and Hillary I’m sad to say I’d be rooting for Hillary. What is scary is a possible Hillary Obama ticket in November....the socialist and the hopelessly naive


67 posted on 08/02/2007 1:44:05 PM PDT by The Great RJ ("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ulm1

You know, I’m the same age as this moron (well, I’m 4 1/2 months older). I’ve never been a US Senator or any kind of elected official, but I’ve worked in a variety of REAL jobs. But like the proverbial first 100 names in the Boston phone book, I’m positive that I could do a far better job as President than this shiite-fur-brains uber-lib...

...starting with the question at issue. My answer would be, “ I will use nuclear weapons against any and all adversaries of this country who threaten our nation, its armed forces or its vital interests in such a way that we can effectively respond in no other way. If attacked with nuclear weapons, we ABSOLUTELY will respond with an OVERWHELMING nuclear response, such that the nation or nations which attacked us would cease to exist as effective societies.”

Anyone want to start up an exploratory committee for me?


68 posted on 08/02/2007 1:45:01 PM PDT by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ulm1

The youngster proves he’s not ready for prime time.


69 posted on 08/02/2007 1:46:26 PM PDT by Beckwith (dhimmicrats and the liberal media have chosen sides -- Islamofascism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ulm1

Now we know why this cryptoMuslim is called the “Obamination”!


70 posted on 08/02/2007 2:44:41 PM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theDentist

As much as I hate the existence of nukes, there’s no other chose but to stand clear on the consequences. JFK wasn’t a perfect president, but atleast he stood-up and said he defend our country against the evil USSR.

Without MAD, we’re nothing but a target. Obama can’t get the presidency.


71 posted on 08/02/2007 4:12:52 PM PDT by Rick_Michael (The Anti-Federalists failed....so will the Anti-Frederalists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson