Posted on 08/01/2007 11:30:59 AM PDT by AndrewWalden
A PDF copy of Hillary Rodhams senior thesis at Wellesley arrived in our inbox this morning. it is titled:
There is only one fight an analysis of the Alinsky Model
Although I have no loving wife to thank for keeping the children away while I wrote, I do have many friends and teachers who have contributed to the process of thesis-writing.
We have not had a chance to review and will do so today. Regardless, we wanted to post this as soon as possible to share with everyone. Hillary is running for President and it is important to know what she really believes. This document was hidden from public view during her husbands presidency -= an apparent favor to the Clintons fromt he President of the university - and interest in it fell when the Clintons left office. Now with Hillary a top Democratic candidate for President the importance of this document has frothed to the surface again....
(Excerpt) Read more at gopublius.com ...
Hillary Clinton is the author of a thesis she wrote. She therefore should own the copyright.
As conservatives, do we think we have the right to steal her work and download it for free? Doesn’t she have the absolute right to her own intellectual property? If she wanted to sell it, wouldn’t that be her right to do so, and if she wants to prohibit people from publishing it, shouldn’t she, as the property owner, have an absolute right to do so?
Why are we conservatives so happy to abandon our property ownership principles when it helps us “get” the other side?
Bump for later
“Europe is Europe is Europe”
When hClinton was doing her book tour in Europe in June 2003, she did an interview with Spiegel and made some strong socialistic comments. Most of her comments seemed to have been bypassed by the US MSM.
The PDF of that interview with a rough online translation from German to English is at this url:
Where did I say that I did?
Sure, they’re dead. Dead men tell no tales. (or wear plaid)
mark
Of course it is poll driven, as is locality.
Now when she goes to campaign in Chicago, I'm sure she'll say she's always been a Cubs fan, and would really like to see them make it to the Super Bowl.
You’re not running for POTUS, she is.
But, for what it is worth, the biggest Yankees fan I ever met was raised in a rural area a long, long way from New York City. I remember watching a number of games with him back in the glory days of Thurman Munson.
I've known a few folks like that. I knew a huge Red Sox fan named Mike who lived all his life in Philadelphia. The reason he liked the Sox was that his dad was a Ted Williams fan, and it just passed down through the family.
The difference between Mike and Hillary is Mike had a believable story about how he became a Red Sox fan.
Holy Moses. I’m only on page 10, but already, I’m having trouble seeing how the woman who wrote this graduated from Wellesley.
Is that “Train” as in boxcars with leg shackles?
Neat. Now I’ve got some light reading for tonight.
It shows that she is a communist. No surprise there. Please obtain a copy for yourself, since the slimeslingers will try to outlaw it.
Copyrights expire after, I believe, 17 years. This lousy piece of writing is in the public domain.
i love the part on page 47 where she details how she would end american imperialism in the middle east to prevent the rise of an extremist terrorist organization bent on destroying innocent americans by flying hijacked planes into buildings.
wow, she is the smartest woman ever...
jk
teeman
Ping for later
Let’s see...
It’s been a couple of hours, Hillary should announcing the whole thing is ‘old news’ any moment now.
Written and artistic works are a different matter.
Never the less, she did publish this work as a thesis. Is not a thesis open for examination? Sure the university held it during Bubba's term, but it is out in the wild now, and it is not being used to "make money" by publishing some elses work as your own (like any sane person would claim this tripe as their own). Furthermore, I would consider such a paper to be insightful into the mind of one who would be president.
So Charles, consider the paper's dissemination on the net as a public service and "fair use".
Our own BKO is whom you mention. She didn’t believe what she saw was complete and unedited, and given the Wellsley complicity with leftist liberalism and the clintons, don’t be surprised if the released version is a redacted remanufacture sanitized for the Rodham-rodent’s benefit.
Thanks very much for the post/link.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.