Hillary Clinton's SUPPRESSED Thesis finally on line in its entirety

gopublius.com ^ | May 2, 1969 | Hillary Clinton

[AndrewWalden]

A PDF copy of Hillary Rodham’s senior thesis at Wellesley arrived in our inbox this morning. it is titled:

“There is only one fight …” an analysis of the Alinsky Model

Although I have no ‘loving wife’ to thank for keeping the children away while I wrote, I do have many friends and teachers who have contributed to the process of thesis-writing.

We have not had a chance to review and will do so today. Regardless, we wanted to post this as soon as possible to share with everyone. Hillary is running for President and it is important to know what she really believes. This document was hidden from public view during her husband’s presidency -= an apparent favor to the Clintons fromt he President of the university - and interest in it fell when the Clintons left office. Now with Hillary a top Democratic candidate for President the importance of this document has frothed to the surface again....

[GOPPachyderm]

I downloaded it!

[Dick Bachert]

correction:
trip = TRIPE!!

[Turbo Pig]

Credentialed elitists running make-work programs in "model" communities...

The Nazis and Communists had these...they were called concentration camps.

[nicmarlo]

When you read this (Hillary ends with a call for "social revolution") you will see why the Clintons suppressed it for so long. This is the life plan Hillary has been following for nearly four decades.

This is the first time this hidden thesis has made it in its entirety online. Please download a copy for yourself to read and forward this to all your email lists. The Clintons will try to suppress this, but if it is everywhere on the internet, they will fail.

fyi ping!

[Czar]

If there is a revolution it won't be the one "Bruno" envisioned with her thesis, written in the hippy/dippy days of her youth. She is just as dumb now as she was then. "World's smartest woman?" Please....

[AndrewWalden]

Here are some other places to download from:

www.gopublius.com/HCT/HillaryClintonThesis.html
(paginated version — will be easier for dial-ups)

It is also online in pdf at:
http://nukegingrich.wordpress.com/2007/08/01/rules-for-radicals/

http://www.freedomunderground.org/view.php?v=3&t=3&aid=24118

[nicmarlo]

Would you settle for “evil,” then?

I know I would.

[Czar]

"Would you settle for “evil,” then?"

Yes

[justiceseeker93]

Do you think that Alinsky would have offered HRC a job if he didn't have some familiarity with her? The two of them very likely had some contact back in Chicago when HRC was visiting inner city areas and was involved in poverty projects as part of her church youth group activities as a high schooler. There is a chronological, geographical, and ideological connection there.

There are other accounts regarding HRC and Alinsky's relationship in some of the critical HRC biographies. Those were published much earlier than her autobiography and the WaPo article you cite. I would trust the accuracy of those souces more than I would her "Living History" (sometimes referred to as "Lying History") or a WaPo puff piece.

[justiceseeker93]

Whose freedom of speech is being abridged if a candidate for public office decides not to make available to the public a book or article that he or she may have written in the past? I just don't get the connection to the First Amendment. Are you saying that when someone runs for public office, he/she loses any copyright law protection that he/she may have had?

Yes, I agree that no right is absolute. In fact, in this case, one might be able to publish her thesis (or parts of it) without violating copyright protection if that publication falls within the "fair use doctrine." That's derived from a series of SCOTUS decisions; it's a bunch of tests that courts use to determine copyright cases typically when the defendant creates a work derived from the original work of the copyright owner.

[WorkerbeeCitizen]

Thanks for the ping

[justiceseeker93]

How can so many many folks out there be so wrong?

One big reason is that education in the US has been dumbed down for several decades, especially in the areas of American history and government.

[T. Rustin Noone]

I am reminded that when Kerry was back in Boston for the DemoConvention in 2004, he attended a Red Sox game. In the process of explaining that he was a die-hard Sox fan and had been his entire life, he was asked who his favorite player was.

His answer, “Manny Ortez”.

Not Manny Ramirez or David Ortiz.

“Manny Ortez.”

I knew at that moment that he was dead to all true Sox fans.

[AndrewWalden]

You wrote: “Whose freedom of speech is being abridged if a candidate for public office decides not to make available to the public a book or article that he or she may have written in the past?”

Everybody’s. Look at the posts to this thread. You are surrounded by 100s of people who are now able to speak freely about Hillary’s thesis because her efforts to stifle their speech by blocking publication have been bypassed.

As it relates to a Presidential election, the right of free speech is superior to the alleged copyright.

When one becomes aware of hidden and highly controversial writings of a candidate for public office one should seek to make those available to the public. This is a very specific situation.

[rodeo-mamma]

Hillary mentions in her thesis that gangs are useful for maintaining order. She says that we can create a new world. I suppose this is admission that she and her husband have used Mafia Style power grabs. Honestly, she is boring to read. There is no insight. I managed to get to page 24. I will have to keep reading. She says that people who are responsible for real change are radicals. And she describes them as being unreasonable and emotional. She attributes all the good that has come from this group. Then she talks about how it is useful to make people angry to affect change. She's just so darn boring to read, yet I know it is important to read, so I will try later when I have had 5 extra cups of coffee. The only thing I can say is that it is propaganda, to try to justify their tactics by claiming that all good has been accomplished by radicals, and then proceeds to say that they are emotional and unreasonable. That's a lie, all good came about by God Fearing people who were reasonable and had control over their emotions and were able to fight against cruelty WITHOUT losing it.

[EverOnward]

bookmarked - thanks!

[combat_boots]

Her wordsm not mine.

Good. Thanks.

[justiceseeker93]

Civil rights and liberties are rights of private individuals or private groups and organizations, not collective rights of the entire body politic (as lefties often proclaim, e.g., the "right to education", the "right to medical care".). Abridgement or denial of the freedom of speech comes when government takes reprisal or retaliation of some form or another against an individual group which says or publishes something not illegal that a government entity finds offensive. So if, for example, the IRS decided to audit and harass any FReepers in retaliation for their comments about HRC or her thesis, that would be a violation of those FReepers First Amendment rights. On the other hand, the mere genearal lack of access to the thesis (a private document under copyright protection) is not a violation of the First Amendment.

Now that I've explained that, perhaps you can appoint me to a federal judgeship. (Only kidding, of course.)

[nicmarlo]

yw.

[nicmarlo]

As I thought.

: )