Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

When illegal migrants flood a city (Hazleton, PA)
The Christian Science Monitor ^ | July 31, 2007 | Clay Bennett

Posted on 07/31/2007 7:30:18 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

A telling irony shines through last week's ruling by a federal judge that found only Congress can set immigration law. The judge knew full well that half the plaintiffs in the case were in the US illegally. But he let them challenge a city ordinance on immigration anyway – and anonymously.

And so it's been in America for too long: Turn a blind eye to the massive lawbreaking of an estimated 12 million illegal immigrants.

Imagine if a scofflaw wanted by the FBI had sued a city for enacting a criminal law tougher than a federal law. Would that person also be given a day in court?

(Excerpt) Read more at csmonitor.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Mexico; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; barletta; crimaliens; hazleton; illegalaliens; illegalimmigration; illegals; immigrantlist; immigration; invasion; judicialactivism; justicesystem; laraza; urbanwasteland; vampirebill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
Not a bad opinion piece for CS Monitor.
1 posted on 07/31/2007 7:30:24 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The fact that ANY illegal aliens are granted ANY public assertion rights, petition of grievances, open demonstration and assembly, to even address a County Supervisor or City Council meeting in public hearing for example, on the same level as LEGAL immigrants or AMERICAN CITIZENS in the same room, and be alloted the same time and prominence to speak and testify, shows me this is a deep national cultural, mental problem in the USA.

Face it, we are TOO OPEN in the USA. Most countries on this planet would NEVER reserve such "rights" to people not legally on their soil.

We are such saps. How did we get this way!!!??? It defies all logic and fairness.

2 posted on 07/31/2007 7:36:53 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Visit this thread 1-hour from now. In that time-an average of 416.6 more ILLEGALS will be in the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

how can this judge be legally removed??


3 posted on 07/31/2007 7:37:45 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Visit this thread 1-hour from now. In that time-an average of 416.6 more ILLEGALS will be in the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Yeah, pretty accurate.


4 posted on 07/31/2007 7:38:43 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker ( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

Incompetence surely! The case will never hold up on appeal.


5 posted on 07/31/2007 7:43:47 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker ( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

“Face it, we are TOO OPEN in the USA. Most countries on this planet would NEVER reserve such “rights” to people not legally on their soil.”

Protecting criminals from the law is insanity!


6 posted on 07/31/2007 7:46:53 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker ( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

Eventually they will have more rights than citizens. It may be that way already. Certainly, they seems to be exempt from laws and regulations that apply to citizens. I know that if I got caught driving without a license, my ass would be hauled off to jail.


7 posted on 07/31/2007 7:46:56 PM PDT by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“Imagine if a scofflaw wanted by the FBI had sued a city for enacting a criminal law tougher than a federal law. Would that person also be given a day in court?”

BINGO


8 posted on 07/31/2007 7:49:58 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Disband the border patrol. It’s for show anyway, El Presidente....


9 posted on 07/31/2007 8:19:24 PM PDT by Sybeck1 (I like Rodney Carrington's recipe for World Peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I don’t see how this will stand, as the article states the SCOTUS has already made other decisions that allow local govts to exceed fed regulations.


10 posted on 07/31/2007 8:21:37 PM PDT by Free Vulcan (Fight the illegal Mexican colonizers & imperialist conquistadors! Long live the resistance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

OK, everybody knock it off! You are going to make Karl Rove angry.

He knows what’s best for you. Very soon these illegals are going to vote straight Republican. Also, the companies that exploit them by paying them $10/hr without benefits will make huge profits that will allow them to make large contributions to the Republican party.

This is capitalism at its best. Stop fighting it or they will get an illegal to take your job, too.

/cynicism


11 posted on 07/31/2007 8:27:29 PM PDT by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The real question here is: What are WE going to do about this insanity? Our politicians can/will not act, except to give illegals more civil rights, immunity from the law, etc. I suggest that the time is now here for citizens to act. IMHO failure to deal with this will bring war to the US.


12 posted on 07/31/2007 8:29:36 PM PDT by whipitgood (Let's burn some MEXICAN flags!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Man, last time I was in Hazleton (15 years ago) it was a dying coal town on the edge of the Poconos, where half the population seemed to be over 65. How quick things change!


13 posted on 07/31/2007 8:30:14 PM PDT by Clemenza (Rudy Giuliani, like Pesto and Seattle, belongs in the scrap heap of '90s Culture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Constitution of the United States; Amendment X

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

Someday in this illegal immigration debate some judge is going to read this.


14 posted on 07/31/2007 8:31:17 PM PDT by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Hazleton should just continue enforcing its ordinance prohibiting anyone from hiring or renting to illegals.


15 posted on 07/31/2007 8:39:21 PM PDT by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldbill

we have a winner


16 posted on 07/31/2007 8:41:46 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Visit this thread 1-hour from now. In that time-an average of 416.6 more ILLEGALS will be in the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

Logically, it dissolves the United States of America, by denying the legitimacy and significance of citizenship. This is really happening, IMHO. The denials are of the form, “Don’t be ridiculous, and anyway only a rightwing bigot WOULDN’T want to dissolve the USA.”

... but who am I ?


17 posted on 07/31/2007 8:45:16 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dr_lew

The Minuteman organization, IMHO, after all this nonsense by now, should be about 10 times it’s strength and should be effective in stopping mass waves of intruders on foot. Maybe it has not come to that yet for the average Joe Sixpack out there, but I am telling you, he is slated to lose everything and he won’t know what hit him. They better wake up and get involved and shut the border down through people power.


18 posted on 07/31/2007 8:55:26 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Visit this thread 1-hour from now. In that time-an average of 416.6 more ILLEGALS will be in the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
A telling irony shines through last week's ruling by a federal judge that found only Congress can set immigration law.

Hazelton wasn't trying to dictate what immigrants do. It was trying to regulate landlords and businesses. And if I understand the 1986 immigration law correctly, it specifically provided local governments with the right to impose rules about illegal immigrants as part of the business licensing process.

19 posted on 07/31/2007 9:16:46 PM PDT by freespirited (Thank you for not lying about Republicans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

bump


20 posted on 07/31/2007 9:23:23 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson