Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Spy chief: Anti-terrorist programs more extensive than acknowledged
CNN ^ | 7/31/2007

Posted on 07/31/2007 6:58:32 PM PDT by james500

The Bush administration's anti-terrorist surveillance efforts are more extensive than top officials have acknowledged, going beyond the controversial no-warrant eavesdropping program, the U.S. intelligence chief said Tuesday.

President Bush acknowledged a program allowing the government to wiretap phone calls without obtaining a warrant in 2005. The program, run by the National Security Agency, is at the center of disputed congressional testimony by Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.

Gonzales is defending himself against allegations that he lied to Congress about a 2004 dispute between the White House and Justice Department over the legality of the eavesdropping program.

In a letter defending the embattled attorney general, National Intelligence Director Mike McConnell states that eavesdropping is just one of the programs President Bush authorized after the September 11, 2001, attacks on New York and Washington.

"This is the only aspect of the NSA activities that can be discussed publicly because it is the only aspect of those various activities whose existence has been fully acknowledged," McConnell wrote.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: disclosure; doubleagents; fellowtravelers; islam; moles; msm; muhammadsminions; nytimes; spies; usefulidiots; waronislamism
Don't worry, CNN. NY Times will disclose those other "controversial" programs just as soon as they can.
1 posted on 07/31/2007 6:58:37 PM PDT by james500
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: james500

Way to go CNN, make sure the Islamofascist know EVERYTHING we have in our playbook. You sick S*B’s


2 posted on 07/31/2007 7:01:06 PM PDT by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: james500

Screw the Dimocraps. Whatever the Bush administration is doing to keep us safe is OK with me. I don’t see the “gross violation of civil rights” proclaimed by liberals and professed in the MSM.


3 posted on 07/31/2007 7:01:56 PM PDT by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: james500

bump


4 posted on 07/31/2007 7:03:30 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: james500

They shouldn’t say anything to anyone. There job is to protect this country. Frankly, I don’t care what they do as long as this country is safe.


5 posted on 07/31/2007 7:05:57 PM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marty60
This can work to our benefit. If Achmed thinks we have him wired no matter what....then we do.

It's kinda like Bill Cosby in "200 MPH." "As near as I can figure, they've gotta be hidin' in my trunk."

6 posted on 07/31/2007 7:07:06 PM PDT by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RC2

“Frankly, I don’t care what they do as long as this country is safe.”

As long as it’s in the interest of national security right? Careful, loaded question here.


7 posted on 07/31/2007 7:08:48 PM PDT by jedward (Mission '08 - Take back the House & Senate. No Negotiations...No Prisoners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: james500

In the first place. The Bush administration is not spying on Americans. Unless they have some link to terrorism. And the final answer to the spying question. What would any law abiding American have to hide anyway?


8 posted on 07/31/2007 7:13:39 PM PDT by cquiggy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: james500

Much less spying than Klinton’s program.


9 posted on 07/31/2007 7:14:14 PM PDT by mountainlyons (Hard core conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cquiggy

The government agency that does by far the most surveillance of our citizens would be the IRS.


10 posted on 07/31/2007 7:19:58 PM PDT by beef (Who Killed Kennewick Man?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: All

The full letter is linked here:
http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2007/images/07/31/31.july.2007.dni.lette.tohon.specter.pdf

Not much there that isn’t in the article but I noticed they stayed away from quoting, “it remains the case that the operational details even of the activity acknowledged and described by the President have not been made public and cannot be disclosed without harming national security.”


11 posted on 07/31/2007 7:19:59 PM PDT by james500
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: james500

Gee. Oh and just to point out a fact........there have been no terrorist attacks in America during that period.
But there have been a bunch of arrests of suspected terrorists.
Funny the MSM fails to note the above fact.


12 posted on 07/31/2007 7:22:51 PM PDT by o_zarkman44 (No Bull in 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: james500

Why not just tell Osama they are tracking him by his cell phone. Oh yeah, you already did that...


13 posted on 07/31/2007 7:31:35 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: james500

14 posted on 07/31/2007 7:37:57 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

The one that REALLY got to me was after the bad guys released that video of UBL with the rocky terrain (2003). MSM fell over itself to explain that we had specialized geologist analysts identifying exactly where the video had been taken. I don’t believe any outdoors videos have been released since then.

Why do the bad guys need their own intelligence services when they’ve got NY Times?


15 posted on 07/31/2007 7:51:45 PM PDT by james500
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: marty60

CNN's AntiAmerican MOTTO and CREED : Ted Turner, June 18, 2002:
"So who are the terrorists?
I would make a case that both sides are involved in terrorism.
"

16 posted on 07/31/2007 7:53:01 PM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mountainlyons

Much less spying than Mark Penn, Hillary’s pollster, has done to his rival!!! Matk Penn should be in JAIL for what he did.


17 posted on 07/31/2007 7:53:54 PM PDT by Suzy Quzy (Hillary in '08.....Her PHONINESS is GENUINE !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Suzy Quzy

Why is it not surprising that ole Hil would have an unethical minion.


18 posted on 08/01/2007 12:55:16 AM PDT by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson