Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go
through Congress.
Posted on 07/31/2007 10:54:41 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
“Is the tide turning in Washington?”
“I’m not yet persuaded that it is, but this piece by Dan Balz and Chris Cillizza in the Washington Post provides some grounds for optimism. They report that House Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-S.C.) says a strongly positive statement progress in Iraq by General Petraeus likely would split Democrats in the House and impede his party’s efforts to press for a timetable to end the war.”
“According to Clyburn, Petraeus carries significant weight among the 47 members of the Blue Dog caucus in the House (i.e., the less than liberal Democrats). Sadly, it’s not clear that Petraeus carries as much weight with moderate and liberal Republicans.”
“As significant as what Clyburn said is the way he said it. According to Clyburn, a strongly positive report by Petraeus would be “a real big problem for us.” Clyburn’s candor may be commendable, but it’s unfortunate that the Dems regard strongly positive news from Iraq as a problem.”
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2007/07/018082.php
I`m not persuaded the tide has turned yet, either. But since the donk party is so heavily vested in our defeat, I can see why they would consider any positive news as a problem, and will dismiss out of hand anything positive Petraeus has to say.
” But since the donk party is so heavily vested in our defeat, I can see why they would consider any positive news as a problem, and will dismiss out of hand anything positive Petraeus has to say.”
This is OUTRAGEOUS!
I'd rather he retire to that comfy chair in the fire!
The same goes with Jim Webb....in his face off with Lindsay Graham, he admitted that he had not been to Iraq...while Graham has been there 7 times. Both Murtha and Webb don’t want to talk to soldiers there because they are afraid of what they will hear. Better to stay put and put their hands over their eyes and ears...while they continue to shout out the same treason over and over again.
Petraeus takes it!
Let Murtha be his party’s heavyweight in congress. If by heavyweight you mean numbers on a scale…
Murtha takes it over Petraeus w.r.t. the weight scale!
This positive report was published in the NY TIMES and reproduced today around the world.
Amazing, now that really surprised me when I saw it again this morning in one of our national newspapers.
When will Americans start ignoring Murtha’s and the rest of these surrender monkeys’ diatribes that are not based on any facts?
Of course, I can imagine that the Creative News Network (CNN) really questioned what Murtha’s source of information.
Hey John, in whose cookie jar can we now find your “grubby hands”?
“When will Americans start ignoring Murtha’s and the rest of these surrender monkeys’ diatribes that are not based on any facts?”
Maybe now, seems the polls are improving - down for Dems, up for the surge.
“When will Americans start ignoring Murtha’s and the rest of these surrender monkeys’ diatribes that are not based on any facts?”
Maybe now, seems the polls are improving - down for Dems, up for the surge.
Frankly, I think those on the right are desparate for good news/polls and the left for bad news/polls. I’d rather be hoping for the best than for bad news for America, so I guess I’ll never be a dem/lib.
Murtha lied while US troops died.
LOL!!
Typical murtha video with the same canned rhetoric. He’s memorized one sheet of paper and uses it for every interview regarding the war. The guy is a very sad sister.
Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go
through Congress.
"I don't know what they saw. But I know this: that it's not getting better", Murtha said.
What an asshole.
And, in a related development, Murtha was one of nine Congressmen who voted AGAINST increasing ethical standards in the Congress, especially regarding "earmarks".
Thus, in addition to being an asshole, he is also corrupt.
ping
Sad to say that wishing him to Iraq is just wishing more work on the fluff and buff's. He would only be waiting on as he swills coffee in the green zone never listening to anything that could cause him a problem such as progress on the ground. The man has sold his honor for political gain. We can only hope that history remembers him for what he is doing.
History will be written, but by who?
I figure if we don't get him now, we'll never get him.
Well I do believe that is why I used the words “we can hope”.
Wishing, and hoping, and praying (Sounds like a song) are swell. Doing is better. :-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.