Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/31/2007 9:52:50 AM PDT by SirLinksalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
To: SirLinksalot

On the surface, it sounds like a good idea.


2 posted on 07/31/2007 9:57:02 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot

Sounds like a good plan. Relying on government to take care of you is just stupid.


3 posted on 07/31/2007 9:57:02 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot

I presume the democrats position, at least for this election, is “feed yourself”. How heartless. How cruel.


4 posted on 07/31/2007 9:57:33 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot
"There must be public funding for abortions, it's a constitutional right" - Rudy in 1989

No thanks Rudy, you can take your healthcare schemes and shove it.

5 posted on 07/31/2007 9:58:08 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot
President Bush has proposed a similar plan.

It's a good one.

8 posted on 07/31/2007 10:00:53 AM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot

Bah. Just sign me up for the same healthcare plan Congress has. That’ll do.


10 posted on 07/31/2007 10:03:06 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot
All of these plans account for all present healthcare payments made by the government ~ and then "spread the wealth".

That will include 100% of the expenditures now made for Veterans Administration, public employee health plans, welfare related health plans, Medicare, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, etc.

Veterans and the elderly will go to the back of the line for a lesser quality of service. Government workers will take a serious pay cut, as will private sector retirees who will continue to pay premiums for less service.

CDC will go out of business among other things.

All of the plans propose spending everything primarily on the health of young professionals and workers and their children.

11 posted on 07/31/2007 10:03:32 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot

Giuliani is a lifelong liberal.

Never trust any liberal.


12 posted on 07/31/2007 10:04:40 AM PDT by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot
Critical to Giuliani's plan is a $15,000 tax deduction for families to buy private health insurance, instead of getting insurance through employers. Any leftover funds could be rolled over year-to-year for medical expenses

CALL A CODE STAT I think I'm going to have a heart attack - I ACTUALLY HEARD SOMETHING FROM THE LITTEL FASCIST POS THAT I DIDN'T TOTALLY DISAGREE WITH. Of course even a stopped clock is right twice a day.

13 posted on 07/31/2007 10:05:25 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government, Benito Guilinni a short man in search of a balcony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot

My health plan for America:

eat less. drive less and walk more.

Cost? $0. Actually you’ll save money otherwise spent on food and gas


15 posted on 07/31/2007 10:06:26 AM PDT by ari-freedom (Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot

If the $15,000 per family tax break is paid for by an equal reduction in government expenitures (thus no increase in taxes to make up for it), then I’m for this.

But we all know that will not happen.

Thus, the $15,000 per family tax break is really an insurance allotment. From the government. Everyone pays more taxes so that the government can hand out more candy.

No thanks. My employer and I have a deal. I work hard, they pay my insurance. No government involvement.

Rudy is still a socialist.


16 posted on 07/31/2007 10:09:39 AM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot

I’d bet a body part taxpayers paid for his prostate cancer treatment.


18 posted on 07/31/2007 10:09:56 AM PDT by Clam Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot
Outstanding health care plan! The best put forward by any politician to date. I was leaning to Thompson and Romney, but Rudy just stole home plate!

The absolute antithesis of any of the democrat party's nightmare Sicko ideas, especially Hillary.


21 posted on 07/31/2007 10:11:14 AM PDT by FormerACLUmember (The ideal tyranny is that which is ignorantly self-administered by its victims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot
We don't need government in health care. It was started in WW II when industry used health insurance to get around wage and price controls when luring workers. Then, in 1964, Medicare and Medicaid began and has been getting bigger and bigger.

Eliminate Medicare and Medicaid, SSI benefits, and allow the market to work. Health care prices will plummet.

22 posted on 07/31/2007 10:14:01 AM PDT by MuttTheHoople
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot
Critical to Giuliani's plan is a $15,000 tax deduction for families to buy private health insurance

Gee, and how is this going to reduce the cost of health insurance? What an idiot..... Giuliani doesn't understand the first thing about the FREE MARKET.

25 posted on 07/31/2007 10:19:49 AM PDT by gunservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot
If the headline is meant to be negative, think how wrong headed that is. There is no plan possible by which a person does not "take care of themselves" whether they pay for a doctor visit, or buy insurance, or pay taxes to obtain a benefit. Just strikes me that "take care of yourself" would be considered a bad thing.

Plus, Giuliani's plan can in no way be described as taking care of yourself. It's a government plan to offset your health insurance costs.

26 posted on 07/31/2007 10:22:34 AM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot
Critical to Giuliani's plan is a $15,000 tax deduction for families to buy private health insurance, instead of getting insurance through employers.

Uh, no, Rudy.

27 posted on 07/31/2007 10:24:10 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot

And where exactly will this $15,000 tax deduction come from? Can I take the deduction as a widowed retiree on medicare? How much would the program cost? If my family’ health care cost is $5,000 per year will I get a $10,000 rebate from the IRS? Will the deduction remain in effect if the government should introduce a fair or flat tax?


28 posted on 07/31/2007 10:29:54 AM PDT by gpapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot

First real common sense plan I have heard.

Rudy is smarter than the average Liberal gives him credit for.


30 posted on 07/31/2007 10:30:10 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot
Rudi can come right over, sit down in my living room, and explain to my wife - who "took care of herself" by leading a super-healthy life style and then got cancer at 58 - how a tax credit - of any size - helps people that private insurers will not cover at any price.
36 posted on 07/31/2007 10:36:04 AM PDT by M. Dodge Thomas (Opinion based on research by an eyewear firm, which surveyed 100 members of a speed dating club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson