[lowbridge]

bump

[ElkGroveDan]

L.A. TIMES LOOKS TO LAYOFF 150 JOBS
http://www.nypost.com/seven/04232007/business/l_a__times_looks_to_layoff_150_jobs_business_.htm

might as well rub it in on occasions like this

[Mad_Tom_Rackham]

Story true, even if the evidence had to be manufactured. <./ Dan Blather comment>

[vetsvette]

“Bush ties Al Qaeda in Iraq to Sept. 11”

Leftists love all lies, but this lie may be the all-time favorite of American leftists.

[george76]

The LA Times is losing subscribers faster than I am losing my hair. This rag has been on a downhill spiral for years and is soon to fade into a nice place with 72 virgin reporters (If you ever saw any of the LA Times reporters you would understand why they are virgins).

They consistently use the front page as an editorial page extension, never provide any balance in any of their stories, and are second only to the NY Times as an arm of the DNC and ANN (Al Qaeda News Network).

.

[bray]

You mean the Lying Times is caught again??

Pray for W and Our Troops

[BARLF]

Rand Beers is a lowlife liberal snot.

JMHO

[WilliamofCarmichael]

"Bush ties Al Qaeda in Iraq to Sept. 11."

LAT is "correct." You don't understand the mind emotions of the liberal.

Here's how President Bush lied claiming that Saddam was connected to 9/11, for example.

Never mind, that I at least cannot find any quotes other than the President saying that Saddam WAS NOT involved. Liberals cannot provide a quote that states otherwise but that does not change how they feeeeeeeeeeeeel.

You see, a large number of the public mistakenly believes that Saddam was directly involved in the 9/11 attacks.

OK. Now the liberals say that Bush does not do enough to correct that misconception therefore Bush effectively claims that Saddam was involved with 9/11 and he's lying.

I am not making this up. I read it, I think Ted Kennedy was one who said it but I cannot locate his statement.