Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Not over yet, ACLU!
1 posted on 07/26/2007 8:18:33 PM PDT by Hacksaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Hacksaw

Here’s the background on the judge. He was appointed in 1998 = Clinton appointee (big surprise/s).

PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND

ENTERED ON DUTY
October 21, 1998

* 1958-1960 U.S. Army
* 1963-1964 Law Clerk to the Honorable Michael J. Eagen,
Chief Justice, Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
* 1964-1978 Partner, Munley & Munley
* 1978-1998 Judge, Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County,
Pennsylvania

SELECTED PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS

* Member, Pennsylvania Bar Association
* Former Chairman, PA Judicial Inquiry and Review Board
* Former President, Executive Board, Forest Lakes Council,
Boy Scouts of America
* Board of Directors, Lawyers Concerned for Lawyers
* Lackawanna Bar Association’s Young Intern Committee
* Former Member, Pennsylvania Board of Law Examiners

EDUCATION

* B.S., 1958, University of Scranton
* LL.B., 1963, Temple School of Law

PERSONAL

* Born: 1936, Scranton, Pennsylvania


2 posted on 07/26/2007 8:29:05 PM PDT by Maynerd (Bush is the Herbert Hoover of border security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hacksaw

Rehash of prior story, I was wondering if someone with some sense had actually read the opinion yet.


3 posted on 07/26/2007 8:31:55 PM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hacksaw

“the legal team that represented several Hazleton residents who filed suit in August 2006 seeking to block the ordinance”

These were illegal aliens .....not American citizens...

American citizens did not need to file a lawsuit..they were not in Hazelton unlawfully...

Illegal aliens have no standing before our courts in such a case...it should never have been heard...


4 posted on 07/26/2007 8:35:50 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hacksaw

I don’t get it. They are illegal per federal law. How is the city forbidden from enacting fines on those who aid and abet criminal activity? How does this supersede or contradict federal law?


5 posted on 07/26/2007 8:51:46 PM PDT by Saint Reagan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hacksaw

Incredibly, the judge allowed the illegal aliens in this case to sue the city anonymously, as “John Doe #1” etc.

The judge used the term “undocumented immigrants” when he himself referred to illegal aliens and when the judge mentioned the city’s characterization of them as “illegal aliens” he put the words in scare quotes.


6 posted on 07/26/2007 8:56:09 PM PDT by SirJohnBarleycorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson