Posted on 07/25/2007 10:05:19 PM PDT by esryle
I am embarrassed that Sutton is still on my payroll.
Get it done already!
How could Bush have let Congress get to the right of him on this issue? What a catastrophe.
And Sutton should be hounded with this to the end of career.
The Democrats allowing this to pass is interesting. It was my read that amnesty had absolutely no chance in the House where Democrats did not want to commit electoral suicide. I guess this could be read as there is significant oppositon to amnesty among Democrats. I guess it could also be read that the Democrats feel that is a way to embarrass the President and his incompetent Justice Department. Either way, it shows how out of touch the Senate is and in particular the many treacherous RINOS.
“Democrats such as Alan Mollohan of West Virginia opposed the attempt to free the two men”
I guess this clown was also in favor of amnesty for illegals. Fancy how the Dims support real criminals and keep good, honest, patriots in jail. I was in El Paso when all this took place and the scenes there were very, very sad. Their families have suffered enough.
Free Ramos and Compean. Shame on George W. Bush.
Thanks to Duncan Hunter and Tom Tancredo!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1867211/posts
Hunter will go to hearing [”Fight” for full pardon for border patrol agents (Duncan Hunter)]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1869422/posts
Tancredo to Offer Amendment That Would Free Ramos, Compean
Notice the absence of the Conservatives’ names in this article.
ping
Duncan Hunter played a large part in this, as well. He has been fighting for Ramos and Compean since they were arrested. Bush is hardnosed about our borders, and Sutton is his good friend. What happens now, I wonder?
I am embarrassed that Sutton is still on my payroll.
I agree - how do we fire the bum?!
I just don’t get Bush. I read over the transcripts and I can’t understand how a jury could return a guilty verdict. They may have violated some BP procedures, but I certainly don’t see they PROVED these men did anything beyond that. No ballistics, no proof the criminal was unarmed, no proof he was shot by the agents. Just the criminals word against the agents. These men were railroaded, period, and I don’t see a reason for such zeal in convicting them of this outside the obvious. Maybe the same reason Bush and Chertoff are ignoring the law and not getting the fence built?
I am sure Perdogg and CharlesWilson, the law and order apologists for Sutton will check in shortly. Hold Congressmen’s feet to the fire on this one!
How does the US Congress have power to intervene in a judicial proceeding? Any constitution lawyers out there?
I’m just curious. (I favor significant reduction of their sentences. However I have not heard good reasons for overlooking their coverup.)
Former mayor of SanDiego (I think) was on a talk show discussing his research.
It’s about time....what a farce.
I agree, my first thoughts at reading this....pretty random, almost as unbelievable as a court using Rowe vs Wade to justify elective homicide
Can Bush multitask?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.