Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House moves to free Border Patrol agents convicted of shooting Mexican drug dealer
AP ^

Posted on 07/25/2007 10:05:19 PM PDT by esryle

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: phillyfanatic

Just like the Duke Lacrosse players railroad job.


41 posted on 07/26/2007 1:08:22 PM PDT by Surrounded_too (Robot machine guns and the Dirty Dozen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice

Finally, some good news concerning this case!


42 posted on 07/26/2007 2:29:37 PM PDT by Pride in the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Souled_Out
President Bush has made his position very clear, any illegal alien, even drug dealers, have rights that trump the rights of any American citizen.

If the Democrats want an impeachment, they'll want to dig into the possibility of a drug cartel payoff in this case. El olor es fuerte!

43 posted on 07/26/2007 3:41:48 PM PDT by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: esryle
I don't see this as anything more than an attempt at Hunter & co. to pander for votes.

The legal precedent on this issue is very clear, Congress can't pardon people. There was a case with almost identical circumstances back in 1946, US v. Lovett, in which the Supreme Court overruled an attempt by Congress to single out three State Dept. employees by name in an appropriations bill.

There's no way that Duncan Hunter doesn't know about that precedent, but he goes ahead with the amendment anyway, knowing it will be overturned, because he gets to look like he's tough on illegal immigration.
44 posted on 07/26/2007 5:25:17 PM PDT by DiogenesTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KingKenrod
How could Bush have let Congress get to the right of him on this issue? What a catastrophe.

George Bush has long since stopped pretending to give a damn about the Right.

45 posted on 07/26/2007 7:13:25 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WildcatClan
I read over the transcripts and I can’t understand how a jury could return a guilty verdict.

I have not read the transcripts but I would bet a goodly sum that if you look closely you will find that Sutton defined the crimes to fit the acts. This is a common tactic of unethical Nifongers in the prosecutors' offices around the land.

46 posted on 07/26/2007 7:16:44 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson