Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House moves to free Border Patrol agents convicted of shooting Mexican drug dealer
AP ^

Posted on 07/25/2007 10:05:19 PM PDT by esryle

WASHINGTON (AP) — The House on Wednesday approved a move by conservative Republicans to try to set free two Border Patrol agents convicted of shooting a Mexican drug dealer.

After a long, emotional debate, the House voted by voice to block the Bureau of Prisons from keeping former agents Ignacio Ramos and Alonso Compean in federal prison. Ramos and Compean are serving 11- and 12-year federal prison sentences, respectively, for the 2005 shooting of Osvaldo Aldrete Davila on the Texas border near El Paso.

Ramos is serving time at Yazoo City Federal Correctional Complex about 40 miles northeast of Jackson, Miss. He was severely beaten by other inmates at the prison in February.

The case has caused a furor among conservative lawmakers and on talk radio across the country.

The agents shot him in the buttocks as he fled, but got rid of crucial evidence and failed to report the incident as required. They later found a load of marijuana in the van but U.S. Attorney Johnny Sutton said there was no proof to tie the drugs to Aldrete so he could not prosecute him.

"The Ramos and Compean conviction has been the greatest misjustice that I have seen, and I have seen a lot," said Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, R-Calif.

Democrats such as Alan Mollohan of West Virginia opposed the attempt to free the two men, arguing that it is not Congress' place to interfere in criminal cases, particularly when they are under appeal as the Ramos and Compean case it.

But Democrats opted not to call for a roll call vote. It could be dropped from the bill during House-Senate negotiations this fall.

The move came as House lawmakers debated a bill funding the Justice Department for the budget year beginning Oct. 1. The underlying measure is likely to pass the House later this week, but the Senate has yet to take up a companion measure.

The language aimed at freeing the men would achieve that goal by blocking the Bureau of Prisons from spending any money to incarcerate them.

"What this does is release these two individuals while the appeal goes on," said Rep. Ted Poe, R-Texas.

Earlier Wednesday, lawmakers said U.S. Attorney Johnny Sutton, who prosecuted the two agents, had refused an invitation to testify before a House subcommittee looking into whether Mexico had a role in the agents' case.

Sutton, the federal prosecutor for Texas' western judicial district, was asked to testify next week before a subcommittee of the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

While saying that his office did not comment on nonpublic matters while cases are pending, Sutton said his office did not have contact with the Mexican government. Sutton made the statements in a July 18 letter to Rep. Tom Lantos, D-Calif., the full committee chairman.

Sutton's decision not to testify angered some lawmakers, particularly a handful of House Republicans who have been pressing President Bush to pardon the agents or commute their sentences.

Rohrabacher said Sutton should "either testify under oath before Congress and explain these things or resign as U.S. attorney."

A message left with Sutton's office was not returned. He testified last week before members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, where he endured some heavy grilling from senators.

Rohrabacher released copies of Customs and Border Protection documents about multiple trips across the border Aldrete made while assisting prosecutors. Sutton had said in the Senate hearing that the immigration documents are a tool often used by prosecutors for witnesses or defendants.

Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, submitted a document in the hearing alleging Aldrete smuggled drugs while making one of those allowed trips across the border. Sutton said at the hearing that the allegations were under investigation.

"These documents verify drug dealer Aldrete Davila had an unconditional, unescorted access pass to cross into the United States," Rohrabacher said. "Free access passes were issued to him even after he was identified by the DEA in a second shipment of narcotics into our country."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 110th; aliens; compean; duncanhunter; immigrantlist; jorgeboosh; ramos; tomtancredo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: phillyfanatic

Just like the Duke Lacrosse players railroad job.


41 posted on 07/26/2007 1:08:22 PM PDT by Surrounded_too (Robot machine guns and the Dirty Dozen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice

Finally, some good news concerning this case!


42 posted on 07/26/2007 2:29:37 PM PDT by Pride in the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Souled_Out
President Bush has made his position very clear, any illegal alien, even drug dealers, have rights that trump the rights of any American citizen.

If the Democrats want an impeachment, they'll want to dig into the possibility of a drug cartel payoff in this case. El olor es fuerte!

43 posted on 07/26/2007 3:41:48 PM PDT by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: esryle
I don't see this as anything more than an attempt at Hunter & co. to pander for votes.

The legal precedent on this issue is very clear, Congress can't pardon people. There was a case with almost identical circumstances back in 1946, US v. Lovett, in which the Supreme Court overruled an attempt by Congress to single out three State Dept. employees by name in an appropriations bill.

There's no way that Duncan Hunter doesn't know about that precedent, but he goes ahead with the amendment anyway, knowing it will be overturned, because he gets to look like he's tough on illegal immigration.
44 posted on 07/26/2007 5:25:17 PM PDT by DiogenesTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KingKenrod
How could Bush have let Congress get to the right of him on this issue? What a catastrophe.

George Bush has long since stopped pretending to give a damn about the Right.

45 posted on 07/26/2007 7:13:25 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WildcatClan
I read over the transcripts and I can’t understand how a jury could return a guilty verdict.

I have not read the transcripts but I would bet a goodly sum that if you look closely you will find that Sutton defined the crimes to fit the acts. This is a common tactic of unethical Nifongers in the prosecutors' offices around the land.

46 posted on 07/26/2007 7:16:44 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson