Freddie has never impressed me,but I have never watched law and order. He is just too ugly to be prez anyway, and we don’t need another womanizer in the white house.
I can only hope that Mitt and Rudy would keep their conservative promises if elected....yeah, right.
How shallow does one have to be to judge a candidate on what he looks like? Such reminds me of the people who would vote for Edwards or Obama or Mitt because they 'look good'.
Would you please provide the details on this womanizing that you allege?
Now THERE are some really cogent arguments!
FYI, he wouldn't be a lead actor on a major series if he was "ugly." Nor would he have been elected senator. Oh, and Carter was butt-ugly and got elected.
Womanizer. Uh, excuuuuuuse me, but he was single and dated a bunch of women. Wouldn't you date people attractive to you if you were single? He's happily married, and there's no hint of any marital infidelity.
Come up with something better than that.
OK, there I have to stop you. For goodness' sake, be logical. Don't make choices on the basis of emotion, as liberals do. If you can put together a closely-reasoned, linear series of arguments against the candidacy of Fred Thompson, fine, vote against him. But this sort of thing is nonsense:
He is just too ugly to be prez anyway . . .
Is that the basis on which we choose candidates? Looks? If so, then we should all vote for John Edwards. How on earth can you in good conscience base a choice on something as superficial and silly as the candidate's looks?
. . . and we don’t need another womanizer in the white house.
Do you have any basis, any basis whatsoever, for suggesting or imagining that he is a womanizer? There was no shred of a whisper that he has been unfaithful to his first wife or to his present wife.
Worded like a troll.
Goodbye.
He is not as cute and a metroman like the breck girl. But then again his haircuts only cost 1% of the trial lawyer stud cuts.
Fred's not a womanizer and obviously women aren't dating him for his looks (hint hint)
Good grief, how silly! I'd prefer someone with some lines in his face over some pretty boy or a socialist harridan! As far as his 'womanizing' is concerned, to what are you referring? Do you mean his dating when he was in the Senate? The man was single at the time, so he had every right to date anyone he chose. Quite different from x42 who 'dated' even though he WAS married!
Better a womanizer than a manizer.
(belch)