OK, there I have to stop you. For goodness' sake, be logical. Don't make choices on the basis of emotion, as liberals do. If you can put together a closely-reasoned, linear series of arguments against the candidacy of Fred Thompson, fine, vote against him. But this sort of thing is nonsense:
He is just too ugly to be prez anyway . . .
Is that the basis on which we choose candidates? Looks? If so, then we should all vote for John Edwards. How on earth can you in good conscience base a choice on something as superficial and silly as the candidate's looks?
. . . and we don’t need another womanizer in the white house.
Do you have any basis, any basis whatsoever, for suggesting or imagining that he is a womanizer? There was no shred of a whisper that he has been unfaithful to his first wife or to his present wife.
I do think people may confuse him with his character on TV, and I really don’t want to have to look at him, and yes I heard rumors he was a skirt chaser, I would be amazed if he isn’t. He may have quit now at his age, one of my grandfathers quit chasing in his 70s.