Skip to comments.
Notice: WorldNetDaily is now on the excerpt only list
Posted on 07/25/2007 9:20:55 AM PDT by Jim Robinson
Notice:
WorldNetDaily is now on the excerpt only list.
Per Joseph Farah's request.
TOPICS: Announcements; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bobwallace; excerpt; faq; farah; wnd; worldnetdaily; worldnutdaily
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
To: PAR35
"...its more reliable than Debka.."
BWAHAHAHAHAAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!
To: Red Badger
When I go around the internet searching for articles on various topics, I find links to WND. I search the lsm on the topic as a back up but they are too leftist to print articles I'm interested in.
Their sponsors put crap on my computer and I had a hard time getting rid of it...........
That hasn't happened to me that I'm aware of.
62
posted on
07/25/2007 10:38:06 AM PDT
by
processing please hold
(Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
To: Jim Robinson
Big deal. WND lost credibility years ago.
63
posted on
07/25/2007 10:38:35 AM PDT
by
TexasRepublic
(Afghan protest - "Death to Dog Washers!")
To: CJ Wolf
Well one of the problems with that is links go out of date or stories get re-edited.With the re-edited version, the original version would still be out there to find and they'd be busted.
Well one of the problems with that is links go out of date
I go to many links and different sites that go out of date, not just WMD.
64
posted on
07/25/2007 10:41:49 AM PDT
by
processing please hold
(Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
To: joebuck
count me among those... good place to bump this thread
65
posted on
07/25/2007 10:46:14 AM PDT
by
Kevmo
(We should withdraw from Iraq -- via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.)
To: Jim Robinson
It's pretty much been on my do not read list for a while now. Its credibility is just barely above Debka these days, though it occasionally has some good contributors.
To: Mr. Know It All
I would argue that any information or content that is being provided fully free of charge on the Internet falls within the public domain for fair use.
But these web sites need the hits for ad money, so I guess it's only right to give it to them (though I won't do it for the New York Times and a few others).
67
posted on
07/25/2007 10:56:27 AM PDT
by
jpl
(Dear Al Gore: it's 3:00 A.M., do you know where your drug addicted son is?)
To: Jim Robinson
but for FR I would not know WND existed.
but for FR I would not read it.
It does have a few good columnists (regan, limbaugh)
this is just minor and understandable.
68
posted on
07/25/2007 11:03:13 AM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: TexasRepublic
I agree.
WND is like the Drudge Report.
I might click it once or twice a month.
Maybe.
To: GovernmentIsTheProblem
lol!
is a bit way out,
like fART BELL.
70
posted on
07/25/2007 11:11:11 AM PDT
by
ken21
( b 4 fred.)
To: Alex Murphy
71
posted on
07/25/2007 11:15:15 AM PDT
by
Fresh Wind
(Without the fence, deporting illegals is like shoveling water.)
To: Jim Robinson
PLease ban all postings from whirlednutsdaily.
FR’s discourse will increase dramatically if the wnd nuts go gossip about Farah’s paranoid rants elsewhere.
To: SaveTheChief
This is a blessing. Their credibility ranks about with CBS in my opinion. Hmmm, that's interesting because I've found WND to be the only news source reporting on many stories that I believe are important, especially regarding immigration, and I've found their reporting on those stories to be far more detailed and researched than most of the stories in the MSM.
They also sell ad space and it should be understandable to real conservatives why they wouldn't want to lose out on all of the potential traffic they would see with links to their stories ( hits = revenue ). It's not a real hardship to click on a link.
73
posted on
07/25/2007 1:01:21 PM PDT
by
Perchant
To: Perchant
>Hmmm, that's interesting because
I've found WND to be the
only NEWS source reporting on many stories that
I believe are
important ...
It's nature's way of telling you something's wrong
It's nature's way of telling you in a song
It's nature's way of receiving you
It's nature's way of retrieving you
It's nature's way of telling you
Something's wrong
It's nature's way of telling you, summer breeze
It's nature's way of telling you, dying trees
It's nature's way of receiving you
It's nature's way of retrieving you
It's nature's way of telling you
Something's wrong
It's nature's way, it's nature's way
It's nature's way, it's nature's way
It's nature's way of telling you
Something's wrong
It's nature's way of telling you
In a song, oh-h
It's nature's way of receiving you
It's nature's way
It's nature's way of retrieving you
It's nature's way
It's nature's way of telling you
Something's wrong
Something's wrong
Something's wrong
To: Jim Robinson; 1rudeboy; Mase
Did we hurt Corsi’s feeling? LOL!
75
posted on
07/25/2007 3:12:47 PM PDT
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Why are protectionists, FairTaxers and goldbugs so bad at math?)
To: processing please hold
And speaking for myself, I greatly appreciate when you do that; it makes my life much simpler.
To: theFIRMbss
And what kind of stories do
you think are important?
Hey, never mind, I just clicked on your profile. No more information needed.
77
posted on
07/25/2007 4:23:09 PM PDT
by
Perchant
To: Alex Murphy
78
posted on
07/25/2007 4:26:19 PM PDT
by
Jet Jaguar
(Who would the terrorists vote for?)
To: processing please hold
The way some FReepers slam World Net Daily, is probably why they requested it.
I recall when FR excerpted half of WND every day. FR is more "mainstream" now. Farah has some stories a little more on the edge.
I know it seems a lot of FReepers seem intent on burning all our old friends here at the site. Even Ann Coulter.
79
posted on
07/25/2007 5:09:29 PM PDT
by
George W. Bush
(Rudy: tough on terror, scared of Iowa)
To: Jim Robinson
80
posted on
07/25/2007 5:15:06 PM PDT
by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson