Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saddam's WMD's on tape : where are they ?
VIDEO ^ | 07 24 2007 | drzz

Posted on 07/24/2007 8:56:30 AM PDT by drzz

"The US intelligence agencies have seen WMD's in a Saddam's military parade in January 2002, WMD's which have not been found after the war." Richard Miniter, intelligence expert ("Iraq had WMDs" in 22 myths that undermine the war on terror, p. 104)

Where are the trucks with the big missiles we see in this propaganda video of the Saddam's era ? There are extracts of many videos, but the footage about WMDs was made after 2002 - it is too good to have been made in the late 90's of before.

It is probably the parade Miniter is talking about : the one of January 2002.

The long-range missiles pictured were forbidden by the UN and could have been filled with chemical and biological germs, like the Iraq Survey Groupd stated (see Duelfer report, "chemical section").


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bush; congress; iraq; iraqiwmds; mapwmd; miniter; saddam; terrorism; wmd; wmdmap; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 07/24/2007 8:56:33 AM PDT by drzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: drzz

Apparently, the truth about the WMD’s is far worse than the flack the Bush Admin took for their supposed non-existence.


2 posted on 07/24/2007 8:58:49 AM PDT by GourmetDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drzz

The major question that seems to be lost on everyone is, “Was Saddam trying to rearm or not”? The answer is, “There is no doubt that he was”.


3 posted on 07/24/2007 8:59:42 AM PDT by U S Army EOD (Say Cheese.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GourmetDan

I agree.

When the Israelis attacked Lebanon during the Summer 2006 war, they bombed the south and Beyruth...

But also the Bekaa valley, which is not supposed to contain anything special...

Actually it is there where most of Saddam’s WMDs are supposed to have been stocked.

See the map of the war :

http://www.debka.com/pictures/Lebanon.jpg


4 posted on 07/24/2007 9:02:10 AM PDT by drzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: U S Army EOD

Yes but you have footage here showing a truck with a big long-range missile forbidden by the UN parading on the Iraqi main street probably in 2002.

It is clear Saddam HAD REARMED.

See the post above. The Israelis thoughly bombed the Lebanon’s Bekaa valley in 2006.

The valley is not supposed to contain anything special... except that a syrian dissent told Holland’s Telegraaf that the Syrians had buried Saddam’s WMD’s there.


5 posted on 07/24/2007 9:04:45 AM PDT by drzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: drzz
I agree. I think they are in Syria. Where else?

Saddam was not on good terms with the Saudis or Turks or Iranians and the Baathists ran both Iraq and Syria which they still control.

While WMD were not the sole reason we got involved there,
and all of the OTHER reasons, taken together, justified our actions in Iraq, the traitors in America and the Democrats - who are essentially the same thing - have zeroed in on this issue as a critical one regarding our involvement there.

Why on earth the administration hasn;t pursued this issue is beyond me, aside from their record ineptitude in communicating with the American public and on foreign policy matters.

6 posted on 07/24/2007 9:07:01 AM PDT by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: drzz

Gee, Dick Cheney and Don Rumsfeld seemed awfully sure about where they were before we invaded.

Why not ask them?


7 posted on 07/24/2007 9:23:33 AM PDT by Ol' Dan Tucker (After six years of George W. Bush I long for the honesty and sincerity of the Clinton Administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drzz

I also think they’re in Syria. Or rather, that’s where they went shortly before we began the war. Who knows where they’ve been secreted away to now.


8 posted on 07/24/2007 9:27:04 AM PDT by RepublitarianRoger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
"Why on earth the administration hasn;t pursued this issue is beyond me, aside from their record ineptitude in communicating with the American public and on foreign policy matters."

I think you are accepting the conventional wisdom here when you should be thinking a little deeper. Govts have always kept secrets when the truth was worse.

I remember that Reagan was also portrayed as 'inept' and was quite content to let his enemies believe that. I can assure you that the administration isn't 'inept'. They simply allow that perception to persist because it is in their best interest to do so.

Think about it.

9 posted on 07/24/2007 9:38:18 AM PDT by GourmetDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RepublitarianRoger

A syrian dissent was sure the Syrian secret services had buried them in the Bekaa Valley.

In one of the best book about the Middle East conflicts, sources say the holes were 6 meters long and 20-35 meters deep. They were built by the Syrian engineers.

The WMD’s were buried between January 10-March 10 2003. Syria was paid 35 million $ for this.

It seems to me that the Israelis targeted the Bekaa valley in 2006 for this...


10 posted on 07/24/2007 9:45:58 AM PDT by drzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: drzz
I read the book by an Iraqi Air force General that described several WMD cases. Check out the Baka valley in Syria!
11 posted on 07/24/2007 9:50:13 AM PDT by mountainlyons (Hard core conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drzz

In a Newsweek photo, I saw a Roland missile booster that had a 2000 or a 2001 lot number on it. He was not supposed to have that. The liberals don’t like to discuss that nor the tons of HMX and RDX explosives we found. Any time you question them when they say he was not rearming they turn around and say he had the right to defend himself. Trying to explain logic to a liberal is like trying to explain ugly to a frog.


12 posted on 07/24/2007 9:51:25 AM PDT by U S Army EOD (Say Cheese.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: drzz

YOSSEF Bodansky, ex-director of the Congressional Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare :

The most authoritative account of Saddam Hussein’s support for Islamic terrorist organizations — including extensive new reporting on his active cooperation with al-Qaeda in Iraq long after the fall of Baghdad /
Extensive new information on Iraq’s major chemical and biological weapons programs — including North Korea’s role in building still-undetected secret storage facilities and Iraq’s transfer of banned materials to Syria, Iran, and Libya / Revelations about the direct involvement of Osama bin Laden in the terrorism campaigns in Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and the rest of the Middle East — including the major role played by Iran and HizbAllah in al-Qaeda’s operations

http://www.amazon.com/Secret-History-Iraq-Yossef-Bodansky/dp/0060736798

AND THE MSM IS SAYING THE EXACT OPPOSITE!!!!


13 posted on 07/24/2007 9:52:20 AM PDT by drzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: U S Army EOD

Agree. As long as we have seen NO evidence of the destruction of the WMDs the UN reported in 1998 and was looking for, those WMDs are at large.


14 posted on 07/24/2007 9:55:50 AM PDT by drzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

“Why on earth the administration hasn;t pursued this issue is beyond me, aside from their record ineptitude in communicating with the American public and on foreign policy matters.”

Well, I have my own point of view about that. The US establishmen has buried everything related to Iraq because most of the US Congress and the former US government of Clinton were toughly fucked by Saddam Hussein :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwD3DCiIpO8&eurl=

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1sx7x_saddams-secrets_news


15 posted on 07/24/2007 10:07:37 AM PDT by drzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GourmetDan

“They simply allow that perception to persist because it is in their best interest to do so.”

It is the best interest of Bush senior, Clinton, and Congress.

Bush and Cheney are the only guys in town who seem to say the truth but are surrounded by the old dark deeds of Washington between 1990-2002.

Remember the years 1990-2002 : they were the weakest for the security of the US in a century.


16 posted on 07/24/2007 10:09:57 AM PDT by drzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

PING


17 posted on 07/24/2007 10:15:29 AM PDT by sono (Where there is a choice only between cowardice and violence, I would advise violence - M Gandhi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: Phatboy

GOSH

THEY ARE !!

For the upcoming war with Israel !!


19 posted on 07/24/2007 11:03:09 AM PDT by drzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson