Posted on 07/19/2007 8:52:30 AM PDT by BGHater
Hmm. Makes a hell of a lot of sense. Maybe I’ll have another look at his candidacy. Not that I think he can win but his positions do resonate with a lot of what’s right here on FR.
bttt
I like Paul’s essays.
I’m not ging to waste my time on this thread. Too much Ron Paul junk on Free Republic right now. It bears ignoring.
I appreciate my freedom and think often of those who paid the price. Our foreign involvement may not be perfect but I truly believe if we hadn’t stood up in Korea and Vietnam, I would be eating communist rice this morning. And if we don’t stand up to the terrorism in the world I will be either dead or ululating in the public square.
Dr Paul Bump
Lots of what he says makes sense. If you read what he says and ignore some of the things that the globalists nuts hit squads attack with you might find a vote you can place and be comfortable with.
Oh Pleeease....All these replys are sooooo scripted. Nothing original here. The Paul-bots are so boring and predictable. Im not going to waste my time on this thread. Too much Ron Paul junk on Free Republic right now. It bears ignoring.
You likely eat communist rice right now. At least my point is that much of what Americans buy come from China.
I like a number of them too.
I’m not a Ron Paul voter but I’m even less of a fan of this globalism crap that came out of the same box as the “It takes a village” crap.
Well there's the rub for me. It's the definition of "threaten us". If the world were still armed with muskets and square riggers it would be easier to know who is a real threat and who is not. But even then, people like Thomas Jefferson who I don't think was a globalist deployed troops to far off lands that he was convinced "threatened us" and our trade.
I’m glad you disagree!
Thanks for input on ignoring this thread and lets keep up the debate!
Paul is spot on here.
Is that why you posted the exact same reply 3 minutes apart? Or is it because you forgot to include the term "Paul-bots" the first time?
What a nutty statement. Leave it to Ron Paul to say something like this. Globalism has nothing to do with either the war on terror or amnesty, think what you may about either issue. Only someone with an idealogical bias like Ron Paul would draw that conclusion.
The purpose behind the war on terror is 9/11. If we had not been attacked by Islamic terrorists, we would not be in a war with them now. That's not globalism; it's self-defense.
The reason most voted for the amnesty bill was to get a political advantage with Hispanics. Again it had nothing to do with Globalism.
Ron Paul is looking for a bogeyman to justify his nutty campaign. In the end he's still a nut.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.