Skip to comments.
Why Bush Is A Loser
Washington Post ^
| Tuesday, July 17, 2007; 7:45 PM
| David Corn
Posted on 07/19/2007 5:02:38 AM PDT by BillCompton
Who knew Bill Kristol had such a flair for satire?
How else to read his piece for Outlook on Sunday, in which he declared, "George W. Bush's presidency will probably be a successful one"? Surely Kristol, the No. 1 cheerleader for the Iraq war, was mocking himself (and his neoconservative pals) for having been so mistaken about so much. But just in case his article was meant to be a serious stab at commentary, let's review Kristol's record as a prognosticator.
snip
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
This is a rebuttal of a Bill Kristol piece (linked above) and the first thing he does is go through a list of big things Kristol got wrong (from a website that tracks such things.) As is typical, the stuff Kristol got wrong is not clearly wrong. So, I did a quick search of Google on David Corn and clicked at random on an article he wrote entitled:
6 Bush Scandals To Come
Hah! He didn't get a single one right...uh, hmmm. On a second look, I guess this is supposed to be satire. There must be inside jokes galore here, but liberals just are not funny anymore. Well, okay this is not a good example of where Corn is a bad prognosticator, but it is an example of how bad he is at satire. No wonder he thinks the Kristol piece might be satire.
To: BillCompton
From the full article:
"But, as the Los Angeles Times recently reported, of the 19,000 insurgents held by the U.S. military in Iraq, only 135 are foreigners.
Is it correct that the LAT published this? If so, are the data correct?
2
posted on
07/19/2007 5:12:32 AM PDT
by
jammer
To: BillCompton; the Real fifi
David Corn writes for the Nation, and ultra-left magazine. He was invovled in the Plame scandle early on.
3
posted on
07/19/2007 5:17:22 AM PDT
by
Perdogg
(Cheney for President 2008)
To: Perdogg
4
posted on
07/19/2007 5:21:26 AM PDT
by
mattdono
(150 Million bloodthirsty Arabs vs. 4.8 Million Jewish Israelis. That's not fair. [Off Sarcasm])
To: BillCompton
The share of national income going to salaries and wages is at the lowest level since such stats were first compiled in 1929. I would have figured they'd give up on the "worst economy since Hoover" bit after it failed miserably in 2004. Should a Dem win the WH in 2008, watch how everything "miraculously" reverses...best economy in 50 years, low unemployment, budget surplus, etc.....
5
posted on
07/19/2007 5:23:38 AM PDT
by
edpc
(Benchmarks = vandalism)
To: BillCompton
let's review Kristol's record as a prognosticator. And while we're at it let's review the Washington Post's and David Corn's record.
6
posted on
07/19/2007 5:57:58 AM PDT
by
joshhiggins
(O you who believe! do not take the MUSLIMS for friends)
To: BillCompton
David Corn is one of the mosy obnoxious people on the planet....right up their with Eric Alterman. Corn is one of the main reasons I don’t watch FOX anymore.
7
posted on
07/19/2007 5:59:39 AM PDT
by
Suzy Quzy
(Hillary in '08.....Her PHONINESS is GENUINE !!!!)
To: BillCompton
8
posted on
07/19/2007 6:00:49 AM PDT
by
Scythian
To: BillCompton
9
posted on
07/19/2007 6:08:15 AM PDT
by
Stallone
(War with Iran - While Bush is President and Troops are Present.)
To: edpc
The share of national income going to salaries and wages is at the lowest level since such stats were first compiled in 1929. What a fool. Uh, you think it might be due to the fact that Americans are contributing salary and wage dollars in record amounts to IRA and 401k accounts? Of course, left-wing nutballs like Mr. Corn absolutely hate that because it means millions of Americans will be largely responsible for their own retirement, instead of dependent on the Government.
10
posted on
07/19/2007 6:08:21 AM PDT
by
andy58-in-nh
(There are two kinds of people: those who get it, and those who need to.)
To: Suzy Quzy
Given the sad financial state of the publishing world, Corn’s syndicate could save a ton of money by replacing him with 100 chickens.
They would get the same crap for a much lower rate.
11
posted on
07/19/2007 6:08:42 AM PDT
by
ejonesie22
(Hillary has already beat Rudy, She is the better cross-dresser.)
To: Suzy Quzy
Given the sad financial state of the publishing world, Corn’s syndicate could save a ton of money by replacing him with 100 chickens.
They would get the same crap for a much lower rate.
12
posted on
07/19/2007 6:10:06 AM PDT
by
ejonesie22
(Hillary has already beat Rudy, She is the better cross-dresser.)
To: ejonesie22
To: BillCompton
David Corn was the first journalist to reveal that Valerie Plame was “undercover”. I wonder who told him that she was undercover?
/s
14
posted on
07/19/2007 6:17:56 AM PDT
by
Hoodat
( ETERNITY - Smoking, or Non-smoking?)
To: BillCompton
Ha... Bill Compton doesn't know what loser means.. here are some real big time losers


To: AmericanMade1776
Sorry not Bill Compton..but David Corn, Washington editor of The Nation, is coauthor of “Hubris; The Inside Story of Spin, Scandal, and the Selling of the Iraq War.” He blogs at www.davidcorn.com.
Is the loser.
To: BillCompton

I am the great David Cornholio!
17
posted on
07/19/2007 6:21:52 AM PDT
by
bikerMD
(Beware, the light at the end of the tunnel may be a muzzle flash.)
To: bikerMD
Corn had been personally involved in the early coverage of the Plame affair, the controversy over leaks to the media of the name of CIA analyst Valerie Plame. After Plame’s identity was revealed by Robert Novak in a column July 14, 2003, Corn was the first to report that Plame had been working covertly, in an article posted July 17.[10] [11] He criticized Novak for publishing the information, raising the possibility that the leak of Plame’s identity might have violated the Intelligence Identities Protection Act.[12]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Corn
To: jammer
Bill Kristol may be right...Harry Truman was regarded as a ‘failed’ president, but now people admire him and respect him.
19
posted on
07/19/2007 6:25:47 AM PDT
by
nyconse
To: BillCompton
Why doesn’t Mrs. Himmelfarb take her son behind the woodshed for a sound thrashing? At 85, she’s more lucid than he’s EVER been. Yeesh! Love her, barely tolerate him.
http://www.nndb.com/people/304/000116953/
20
posted on
07/19/2007 6:25:54 AM PDT
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson