Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Vows To Veto Cigar Tax (Rush Limbaugh: Cigar Industry Saved By Veto Alert)
Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | 07/18/2007 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 07/18/2007 4:17:25 PM PDT by goldstategop

RUSH: Let's talk about this cigar tax, this cigarette tax. The President says he going to veto it. He "reiterated today his threat to veto Senate legislation that would substantially increase funds for children’s health insurance by levying a 61-cent-a-pack increase in the federal excise tax on cigarettes." This includes that whopping 20,000% increase on the tax on cigars. The tax on cigars right now is five cents. It will go to ten bucks on large cigars. By the way, for those of you who are not cigar aficionados as am I, a large cigar is defined as anything that is not a cigar that will fit in a pack of 20, like cigarettes do. And those aren't cigars. They might be called cigarillos, but if they're made by a machine, you may as well give 'em to the homeless. So the point is, every cigar is a large cigar, ten bucks. The President is threatening to veto it.


Now, here's my problem with this. This is liberalism on the march. This is not a health issue, just like global warming is not a science issue. This is liberalism. This is a tax issue. This is what liberals do. They raise taxes, and they get people to go along with it by targeting a segment of society that is defenseless and helpless, the itty-bitty children. They target the evil in society who are behaving in ways that liberals highly disapprove, i.e., smokers. They've about wrung the cigarette tax thing dry, although that tax is going to be exorbitantly high now. But now they focus on a forgotten area of the tobacco industry, the premium cigar industry. I'm going to tell you people, there is no comparison to a cigar and a cigarette. The cigar is pure tobacco. There are no additives in it. There are no chemicals in it. Only idiots inhale 'em, and not many do for very long. They are a relaxation experience, and it's a whole different mind-set if you're cigar aficionado than if you're a cigarette smoker. If you want to smoke cigarettes, I'm not condemning anything, I'm just pointing out the difference here.

The percentage of the tobacco business that is devoted to cigars is less than 2%, all the cigarettes worldwide and so forth. This tax will put them out of business. But I'm getting off the main point. I am deviating from my main thrust. The main thrust is this is not a health issue. They're using again the little bitty children. Why in the world should one segment of our society be targeted for a tax increase to pay for health care benefits that the parents of these kids ought to be finding a way to afford themselves? If that can't be done, then spread the burden of paying for it, but we've already got how many damn children's health programs do we have? I know that taxes on cigarettes already are going to a lot of this. That's why I've said for years, the cigarette smokers of this country deserve our thanks. They deserve congressional medals of honor because they continue to buy these things and their taxes are funding children's health programs already. What I think ought to happen here, I think the products that these itty-bitty children use ought to be taxed. They're the ones, they ought to be forced, their parents, to pay for their kids' health care.

Why should cigar smokers have to do it? What do kids eat? They eat vanilla Ice cream, they eat Doritos, they eat Coke and Pepsi and 7-Up and whatever, Red Bull spiked with who knows what. I don't know what they do, but make the parents of these kids, every time they're buying a Snickers, raise the tax on a candy bar five up bucks. Diaper tax, absolutely. And if you get throw-away diapers to save the environment, tax those at ten bucks a diaper. Cartoon taxes, that's right. If you watch Cartoon Network, special tax collected on your cable bill. If the itty-bitty children are going to be the beneficiaries of this, why in the hell is somebody that has nothing to do with the itty-bitty children paying for it? How come big government's going to come around -- and I know they think this is going to succeed because they have created such hatred for cigarette smokers in this country. They have successfully over the years created such hatred, secondhand smoke kills. It doesn't. Firsthand smoke doesn't universally kill. I see these numbers, 400,000 cigarette related deaths a year. They don' t know that. Prove it. But the number's out there, just like three million homeless were out there.

Dawn, it looks like you're really getting irritated in there. Is it because I am not sympathetic to the plight of our poor, obese, itty-bitty children who don't have health care? This is not about the kids. It's just a technique to sell this. And of course, name for me the pro-smoker lobby. The cigar association, there's a trade group. I've spoken to them. Great bunch of guys. Everybody I've met in the cigar industry is a fine person, and they're being targeted here. They haven't done a thing. Kids don't smoke their product! Anyway, it just burns me up. The President is going to veto it; reiterated his promise to do that.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: biggovernment; cigarindustry; congress; democraticparty; govwatch; liberalism; limbaughtax; nannystate; nosmokingjihad; rushlimbaugh; sicko; socializedmedicine; taxes; veto
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: goldstategop
legislation that would substantially increase funds for children’s health insurance

Not that there's anything new here, but this doesn't make any sense anyway. These idiots want to spend a ton of new money while simultaneously killing the product that raises the revenue for it. It's the amazing disappearing revenue source... "Voila! It's gone! Now just gimme your wallet and shaddup!!"
21 posted on 07/18/2007 7:53:59 PM PDT by modhom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Put a $10 tax on lattes and frapachinos.


22 posted on 07/18/2007 9:04:34 PM PDT by The Great RJ ("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

btt


23 posted on 07/18/2007 9:25:36 PM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

Quick question. What cigars do you recommend?


24 posted on 07/18/2007 9:28:20 PM PDT by John123 (Bill barely mentions Hillary in his memoirs... I will now light myself on fire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Instead of a tax of $10 per cigar, the govt should do a $10/gallon of gasoline. That will help balance the budget. Not Hillery’s fault if there are undercaptalized families.


25 posted on 07/18/2007 11:34:10 PM PDT by OldArmy52 (Bush's Legacy: 100 million new Dem voters in next 20 yrs via the 2007 Amnesty Act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John123
A quick list:

Mild:

5 Vegas Gold
Licenciados
Perdomo Reserve La Tradicion Champagne

Medium:

5 Vegas Regular (Red Label),Black, Limitadas
Perdomo Reserve La Tradicion Champagne, Maduro
Arturo Fuente Hemingway
Joya de Nicaragua Celebration
San Luis Rey Series G Maduro

Strong:

La Flor Dominica Ligero or Double Ligero
El Rico Habano
Partagas Black
Joya De Nicaragua Antano 1970
Camacho Corojo
26 posted on 07/19/2007 1:07:44 AM PDT by cgbg (Hillary's mob has plans for our liberties--hanging fruit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr
Yeah, that's a real good plan. When a Democrat comes into office and does the exact same thing in regards to bills they don't like, are you going to say it's "not as bad as it seems"???

Sorry, but I like good old fashioned vetoes, because they are right there where everybody can see them, not something that Bush will quietly sign and tuck away somewhere. That kind of crap gives me the creeps, especially given the precedent Bush is setting for Democrats to do in the future.
IIRC slick willie was the one that came up with the signing statements idea. GW just took it and ran.
27 posted on 07/19/2007 4:09:01 AM PDT by ketsu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

Thank you cgbg! Which is your favorite?


28 posted on 07/19/2007 5:45:59 AM PDT by John123 (Bill barely mentions Hillary in his memoirs... I will now light myself on fire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

Hey, thanks for that list. I need to check some of them out. Not much of a cigar smoker but I like a good one every once in a while.


29 posted on 07/19/2007 6:01:41 AM PDT by jalisco555 ("The only thing we learn from history is that we never learn from history." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ketsu
IIRC slick willie was the one that came up with the signing statements idea. GW just took it and ran.

AAHHH!! I see, because a Democrat does it, it's okay for a Republican to do it!!!! Makes perfect sense now, and explains a lot about about Bush.
30 posted on 07/19/2007 7:23:48 AM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: OldArmy52

Tax freaking bottled water! Americans spend more on that unnecessary luxury than almost anything else besides soda! I can get filtered water from my tap!


31 posted on 07/19/2007 8:18:30 AM PDT by txtriedntrue (Tax bottled water!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr

And the courts would probably give great deference to Democratic signing statements, while declaring that Republican signing statements are meaningless.


32 posted on 07/19/2007 2:21:30 PM PDT by Iconoclast2 (Two wings of the same bird of prey . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: John123
The favorite changes every week it seems.

A well-aged (two years plus in the humidor) El Rico Habano with a natural wrapper is probably my favorite today.
33 posted on 07/19/2007 4:31:09 PM PDT by cgbg (Hillary's mob has plans for our liberties--hanging fruit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: cgbg
A well-aged (two years plus in the humidor) El Rico Habano with a natural wrapper is probably my favorite today.

So cigars age like wine? When you say natural wrapper, you mean it is made of tobacco too?

34 posted on 07/19/2007 8:56:44 PM PDT by John123 (Bill barely mentions Hillary in his memoirs... I will now light myself on fire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: John123
The El Rico Habano is offered in two different wrappers. The darker wrapper is called "maduro", the lighter wrapper is called "natural" or "Connecticut".

Cigars are totally natural products made from the tobacco leaves. They do not have any of the additives that cigarettes do.

The best prices on these, btw, are at http://www.jrcigars.com or http://www.mikescigars.com.

They are rolled in the Dominican Republic by a company called El Credito.

Seconds (rejects--but still good versions and less expensive) actually go by the name of "El Credito".
35 posted on 07/20/2007 3:59:44 AM PDT by cgbg (Hillary's mob has plans for our liberties--hanging fruit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: John123
Yes, cigars do age like wine when placed in proper humidity (65 to 70 percent).

A general rule of thumb is that all smokes should be aged at least one year to assure a smooth burn, allow time for a proper blending of the different flavor of the leaves, and remove harshness at the end of the smoke.

Mild smokes reach their peak at one to three years, medium smokes at two to four years, and stronger smokes at three to five years.

After that they tend to mellow out and start to lose some of their flavor.

Many cigars get bad reviews when they have been smoked before they are ready. For that reason I don't trust the reviews in most cigar magazines and rely on the judgment of experienced smokers who age their smokes. They do their reviews in on-line forums.

One good review site in http://www.top25cigar.com.

The forum at http://www.cigarbid.com is another place to look.

If you go to a brick and mortar store your best bet is to look for cigars that have been around the store for a year or two. The cellophane on such older cigars tend to turn brown or yellow over time.

Stay away from the expensive "hot new smokes" the store employees will try to push on you.


36 posted on 07/20/2007 5:11:54 AM PDT by cgbg (Hillary's mob has plans for our liberties--hanging fruit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson