Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NTSB Prelim Confirms Firefighting DC-10 Struck Trees
Tue, 17 Jul '07 ^ | Tue, 17 Jul '07 | Aero-News.net

Posted on 07/17/2007 11:51:02 AM PDT by skeptoid

NTSB Prelim Confirms Firefighting DC-10 Struck Trees Tue, 17 Jul '07

Pilot Landed Aircraft Safely, Crew Not Injured A National Transportation Safety Board preliminary report released Sunday confirmed a DC-10 firebomber, operated for the California Department of Forestry and Fire Prevention (CalFire) was damaged last month during a retardant drop on a brush fire near Tehachapi.

"The flight crew was on their third flight of the day and preparing to jettison a load of retardant," the NTSB report says. "While in a left turn from base to final for the drop, the left wing dipped downward and impacted several trees."

As ANN reported, the aircraft sustained damage to the leading edge of the left wing, and to control surfaces including the aileron.

The odd part is the crew didn't even realize they'd brushed the trees. According to San Diego KGTV-10 News, the plane's crew did not feel the trees strike the wing, but an observer on the ground saw lumber splinter and immediately notified the pilots on the radio.

After impact, the pilot climbed to 11,000 feet for a controllability check. "The crew declared an emergency and returned to the departure airport... where they landed uneventfully," said the report.

The Riverside Press-Enterprise said the DC-10 is out of service for repairs for at least another week following the close-call June 25.

Rick Hatton, one of the aircraft's owners, told reporters the left engine itself was not damaged. "That was pretty lucky, because it hangs down of the left wing and there was damage to either side of it," he said.

Cal Fire Chief Mike Padilla said he is reviewing all DC-10 air operational plans, and the agency is conducting its own investigation.

"We're looking at everything from the weather, turbulence, on that date to our procedures for lining up the aircraft and how the pilots are perceiving the drop," he said.

Padilla said even experienced pilots can often be fooled by mountain topography. "We've had several tree strikes this year."

The DC-10's flight crew has had to undergo air-tanker operations refresher training for as a result of their mishap.

FMI: Read The NTSB Prelim, www.fire.ca.gov Portions Copyright © 1999-2007 by Aero-News Network, Inc. All rights reserved.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: aerospace; airtanker; calfire; dc10; treestrike
Cal Fire Chief Mike Padilla ........ said even experienced pilots can often be fooled by mountain topography. "We've had several tree strikes this year."
(emphasis mine)

Cal Fire is the California Dept. of Forestry & Fire Protection.

1 posted on 07/17/2007 11:51:05 AM PDT by skeptoid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Aeronaut; Paleo Conservative
Previous post of the story.
2 posted on 07/17/2007 11:52:49 AM PDT by skeptoid (AA, UE, MBS (with clusters))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeptoid

Clipping trees with a DC-10—that’s cutting it reeeaally close.


3 posted on 07/17/2007 11:55:40 AM PDT by Clara Lou (Thompson-Hunter '08-- imwithfred.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeptoid

The odd part is the crew didn’t even realize they’d brushed the trees. According to San Diego KGTV-10 News, the plane’s crew did not feel the trees strike the wing, but an observer on the ground saw lumber splinter and immediately notified the pilots on the radio.

‘’ Yaaa. You better pull up a little bit there,, it’s raining timber down here. ‘’

If they can handle harsh atmospheric conditions, they can handle a little lumber too but this was a little close for comfort....


4 posted on 07/17/2007 12:06:51 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Welcome to FR. The Virtual Boot Camp for 'infidels' in waiting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou
Reminds me of this great movie.


While on a bombing run, one of the engines on Al's Catalina water bomber catches fire. In desperation, Pete makes a dangerously steep dive to extinguish it with slurry. He saves Al, but his own A-26 bomber flies so low it hits one of the burning trees, catches fire and explodes.

At least these pilots survived this close call.

5 posted on 07/17/2007 12:13:43 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: skeptoid; xzins; blue-duncan
The DC-10's flight crew has had to undergo air-tanker operations refresher training for as a result of their mishap.

Hopefully that was after they had changed their underwear.

6 posted on 07/17/2007 12:17:10 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
the plane’s crew did not feel the trees strike the wing,

...didn't the plane strike the trees?

7 posted on 07/17/2007 12:21:10 PM PDT by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: skeptoid

The pilot should be un-puckered by sometime in November.

I can’t imagine flying that big boy that close to stuff.


8 posted on 07/17/2007 12:22:55 PM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Actually this would make a great commercial for MDC...if it was still around. I worked with a great group of engineers there before Boeing gobbled it up and I know they would be proud that their designs are holding up so well.


9 posted on 07/17/2007 12:29:42 PM PDT by jettester (I got paid to break 'em - not fly 'em)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jettester

Yup, nothing like flying in turbulent weather and sitting on the wing rows and watching the wings bend and the overhead trays sway as the cabin bounces along ,, DC10 or L1011 or 747, and not spilling a drop.

Good Job to you and the design crew. ;-]


10 posted on 07/17/2007 12:36:47 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Welcome to FR. The Virtual Boot Camp for 'infidels' in waiting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
All of these flying fire-fighting crews have this crash in their minds - C-130 loses wings Dangerous work all around
11 posted on 07/17/2007 12:38:24 PM PDT by Dustoff45 (A non-posting Freeper produces fewer spelling errors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: skeptoid
I wonder if Evergreen Avation is ever going to get their 747 certified.


12 posted on 07/17/2007 12:48:13 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeptoid

It took the NTSB a whole month to figure out that this plane hit the trees, yet it took less than two hours for the NTSB to determine that the Flt. 587 crash was due to a mechanical problem.

Things that make you go, “Hmmmmm.....”


13 posted on 07/17/2007 12:54:45 PM PDT by Roccus (Able Danger??? What's an Able Danger?????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou

Yep, this is the first time I’ve heard of a DC-10 hitting trees... and the crew living to talk about it.


14 posted on 07/17/2007 1:24:59 PM PDT by Restore (see the Cool Aviation Blog at http://coolaviation.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

I love that movie!


15 posted on 07/17/2007 1:26:33 PM PDT by Clara Lou (Thompson-Hunter '08-- imwithfred.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jettester
My dad was a tech-rep for the Douglas DC-10, and was particularly proud of that plane. He lived in Yugoslavia when DC-10s were being purchased by JAT.

The method of payment in the early 70s? Canned pork!

16 posted on 07/17/2007 5:29:08 PM PDT by Does so
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou

Those ol’ DC-10’s are pretty sturdy birds.

As long as the ground crew screwed the engines on tight enough.


17 posted on 07/17/2007 7:52:56 PM PDT by Erasmus (My simplifying explanation had the disconcerting side effect of making the subject incomprehensible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

YES, --- MAYBE, ... I THINK IT IS ...
Since you brought it up, here's a clip of a page from my "Evergreen Supertanker" search on Dogpile, (my fave search tool since 1998.) :

Supertanker Update The Evergreen Supertanker has completed its development program and achieved several major milestones in 2006. On October 27 the B747 Supertanker received its FAA STC (Supplemental Type Certificate). The aircraft also received its Part 137 (Agricultural Aircraft Operations) certification on November 6, 2006.

The Supertanker is pretty sophisticated, and it seems they've done a test progrqam and produced and ops manual.

See Evergreen's FAQ page.

Seat-of-the-pants is not acceptable proceure with this kind of wing loading (IMHO). The DC 10 crew DID NOT KNOW they had struck trees until the observer told them they had indeed done so.

18 posted on 07/17/2007 11:21:42 PM PDT by skeptoid (AA, UE, MBS (with clusters))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson