Posted on 07/10/2007 9:06:01 AM PDT by Dick Bachert
Chill. Thompson can hire anyone he wants. I’m sure Mary will do her usual job for him and stay married to Carville while she does it. Another happy administration.
What if President Thompson appointed Hunter as DHS or something?
1) A fundamental right to Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness, as declared in our founding document establishing our free independent sovereign status as a nation. Thompson regularly states his belief in this fundamental American right.
2) The limited scope and role of the federal government, which Thompson believes was overstepped by Roe vs. Wade, based upon faulty interpretations of law and constitutional language.
Thompson is correct on both issues. Abortion was a state issue before Roe vs. Wade and it will return to a state issue with it’s reversal. That's just a matter of simple law.
Thompson is also correct that no constitutional amendment is required to protect life, which is already specifically protected in the Declaration of Independence, but wrongly interpreted by Roe vs. Wade.
Last, he is also right to assert that the federal government nor you have the right to mandate policy to the states from on high in Washington DC.
All of this is American, conservative and PRO-LIFE!
Nowhere is it suggested here or by Thompson, that the states should then use their power to legalize abortion...
That, was a figment of your imagination.
After 261 posts ~~~~ No Replies
Read the hundred or so other Fred threads where all of these assertions have been repeatedly responded to...
All of this has been debunked so many times that people are simply tired of repeating themselves. Look them up... read them, learn them and stop asking for the same information over and over like a broken DU record.
Not taking sides here, but the Declaration of Independence is only a historical document and protects nothing in today's world. It is not law.
“Chill?” I asked you to support your tagline statement with facts. And your response is “Chill”?
Given your non-response, “Chill” in your language is “I can’t answer your question” in English. :-D :-D :-D :-D
You should give taglines a little more thought. “If you can’t explain it, don’t use it” is a good rule of thumb.
They aren’t “falsehoods.”
What they are is selectively picked items, intended to sway the reader into thinking one thing about a man, and ignoring countless other pieces of evidence that paints the true picture of Fred, a federalist with a decent conservative record.
This is the only place the war can be won...
“The minds and the hearts of the American people.”
Its ironic, actually.
I just finished reading ‘The Reagan Diaries’.
Guess what? Some like this author said the same things about Reagan. Things like ‘He’s abandoned his conservative principals’ or ‘He’s governing like a moderate democrat’.
Forgive us if we make up our own minds, without the help of those that eat, live and breath ‘conservative thought’ as though it came down on a tablet from God.
You’re putting words in his mouth. Link us to him saying those things.
So, the rest of us must assume that you can’t read....
‘I take it this guy thinks only hardliners and Reagan worshipers vote.’
This author said much the same about Reagan during his first term if I’m not mistaken.
Ironic, isn’t it?
This article was written by a libertarian.
NOT TRUE....
Where did you get your law degree, Wal-Mart?
aka - ISOLATIONIST.
It’s funny, but usually the RINOs who make that particular point their be-all-and-end-all do the least of anyone to actually do so. It’s primarily a ruse.
Too lazy to read his screed but who is his candidate?
I have made my federalist sentiments clear for some time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.