[listenhillary]

Go for it. Please post ANY — and I do mean ANY — inaccuracies or falsehoods you find in any of this piece.

After 261 posts ~~~~ No Replies

[PlainOleAmerican]

Read the hundred or so other Fred threads where all of these assertions have been repeatedly responded to...

All of this has been debunked so many times that people are simply tired of repeating themselves. Look them up... read them, learn them and stop asking for the same information over and over like a broken DU record.

[mnehring]

You must not be reading.. one point of the article that was shot down early was Thompson’s voting on the impeachment.. frankly, the fact that the author didn’t even accurately represent what votes the house and the senate make takes a lot of credibility out of this.. Sure, most of this has ventured off into side conversations, but enough has been shown in this article to reveal it’s inaccuracies or it’s ignoring the facts.

[RockinRight]

They aren’t “falsehoods.”

What they are is selectively picked items, intended to sway the reader into thinking one thing about a man, and ignoring countless other pieces of evidence that paints the true picture of Fred, a federalist with a decent conservative record.

[Clara Lou]

So, the rest of us must assume that you can’t read....

[dirtboy]

After 261 posts ~~~~ No Replies

Wrong. I pointed out a whopper in post #25. The article is nothing but sweeping generalities coupled with cherry-picked votes that ignore Fred's larger conservative voting record.