Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conservatives, Beware of Fred Thompson
ConservativeHQ ^ | 7-2007 | Richard A. Viguerie

Posted on 07/10/2007 9:06:01 AM PDT by Dick Bachert

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 1,141-1,149 next last
To: WhiteGuy
Just a quickie from Wiki:
On February 12, 1999, the Senate voted on the Clinton impeachment. Thompson voted "not guilty" on article 1, the perjury article, but voted "guilty" on article 2, the obstruction of justice article. The Senate's vote was 45-55 on perjury and 50-50 on obstruction. Conviction on impeachment charges requires the affirmative votes of 67 senators.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Thompson
101 posted on 07/10/2007 10:03:53 AM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert
Thompson, it is said, was the person who got Senator Baker to ask a Nixon aide: “What did the President know, and when did he know it?” The reply led to the discovery of the Nixon tapes, and that led to Nixon’s resignation.

If Viguerie thinks that's a BAD thing, WGAF what he thinks? Sure as hell not me.

102 posted on 07/10/2007 10:04:19 AM PDT by Petronski (Just say no to Rudy McRomney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vinny

“GWB acted like like a liberal on Medicare, the border, education, and federal spending.”

Thompson would be better on all those issues, I think.


103 posted on 07/10/2007 10:05:06 AM PDT by RockinRight (FRedOn. Apply Directly To The White House!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

Whenever I see hit pieces like this on Fred Thompson, I know the left is running scared. Articles like this strengthen my resolve to support Thompson.


104 posted on 07/10/2007 10:05:07 AM PDT by A. Patriot (CZ 52's ROCK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anonymous Rex
Fred will need everyone of us that jorge bush has alienated in order to win. His supporters would be wise to remember that.

Fred has to appeal to a wide range of voters to win the White House. His gaggle of critics on the right would be wise to remember that, and that any candidate who gives them everything they want will not win the general election. Fred is solid on pro-life, pro-gun and federalism issues. From federalism springs just about everything conservatives should hope for, unless, of course, your the type of limited-government conservative who believes in such unless it limits what YOU want government to do.

105 posted on 07/10/2007 10:05:41 AM PDT by dirtboy (Impeach Chertoff and Gonzales. We can't wait until 2009 for them to be gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert
What the...? How in the...? You mean... oh my stars and garters, a politician who doesn't agree with me 100% of the time on 100% of the issues? Oh, the horror! The horror...

I do so love the ideological Aryans, the "100% pure or you won't get my vote" crowd. I wonder if they've ever voted for anyone? If so, seems to me there's some serious hypocrisy there, as unless you're voting for yourself, you're going to find areas where a politician voted in a way you don't necessarily agree with.

To me, this is much ado about nothing. There's only been one perfect being to walk the planet, and as far as I know, Jesus ain't running on either party's ticket in '08, so seems to me we'll be voting for a man with some flaws. Go figure.

Does make you wonder how deep it'll go, though, doesn't it? To whit:

FACT: Fred Thompson's third-grade report card said -- and I quote -- "Fred is a good child, but sometimes doesn't pay attention". See? SEE? He doesn't pay attention! This is a fact! How can we vote for a man who won't pay attention to what we, the voters, have to say?

FACT: As a fetus, Fred kicked his own mother! How can anyone support a man who would do that?

FACT: This one time, on this one issue type thingie, I heard that Fred said something about this other guy who I liked and I didn't like that things he said Fred said about some other guy. So there. It's true! You can look it up!

Silliness. Y'all keep looking for the perfect candidate. As for me, I'm voting for a President, not a saint.

106 posted on 07/10/2007 10:06:10 AM PDT by Jokelahoma (Animal testing is a bad idea. They get all nervous and give wrong answers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

Maybe we need a Thompson truth file. A lot of the garbage I’ve been reading lately is just a recirculation of charges that have previously been proven to be incorrect. A kind of “Giuliani Truth File” in reverse.


107 posted on 07/10/2007 10:06:15 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

I hope so.


108 posted on 07/10/2007 10:06:27 AM PDT by Vinny (What is a liberal? Someone that is a friend of every country but his own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Anonymous Rex

So, instead he should have found someone who didn’t work for Bush?

Which means, BTW...either they aren’t worth their salt, or they haven’t worked on a Presidential campaign in 20 years...so in your mind they’d be unqualified and inexperienced, and instead, you’d bitch about that.


109 posted on 07/10/2007 10:06:27 AM PDT by RockinRight (FRedOn. Apply Directly To The White House!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: A_Tradition_Continues
What I find confusing is that folks here automatically label any member of CFR as a globalist. Perhaps you can help me with this....how can a person be a globalist (one government rule) yet have a track record of a Federalist?

Ding, ding, ding, another winner.. Most people have NO IDEA what the CFR really is, they just automatically associate it with Globalization. The CFR is nothing more than a 'think tank' and research institute. You can find policy papers on all sides of most issues produced by the CFR. Saying that someone is automatically a globalist because they are a member of the CFR is akin to saying someone is a vegetarian because they ate a salad for lunch.

110 posted on 07/10/2007 10:06:29 AM PDT by mnehring (Virtus Junxit Mors Non Separabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

Fred is scaring the crap out of the Dem weasles. I would think you are a plant sent here to cause trouble. Maybe not but this article is full of sh**. Fred is the man and I, for one, will vote for him if he ever declares. If he doesn’t I will give my vote to Duncan Hunter. If Fred or Hunter fail to win the Primary I will write one of them in during the General. I am tired of voting for Rinos and asshats.


111 posted on 07/10/2007 10:06:52 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert
so are we now saying "Rudi McRomneyson"?

i'm getting so confused...

112 posted on 07/10/2007 10:07:01 AM PDT by RckyRaCoCo (sing after me......de-por-ta-tion cha-cha-cha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Shhh! Don’t tell them that...then we lose control of their minds...

(Black helicopter will pick you up at 1500 hours...)


113 posted on 07/10/2007 10:07:23 AM PDT by RockinRight (FRedOn. Apply Directly To The White House!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: WhiteGuy
Even if true, the failure of the republican senate to force clinton from office for political reasons is more than enough to eliminate each one individually from further political consideration.
How illogical can one person be?
114 posted on 07/10/2007 10:07:29 AM PDT by Clara Lou (Fred Thompson, '08-- imwithfred.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Forward the Light Brigade
Oh yeah, and it’s going to get worse from both sides. It’s the Goldie Locks effect. Seek perfection or die. Not going to happen.

Fred is more than conservative enough and can win. Unless one of the “more” conservative guys break out, I can stand firm with that position.

I’ll let others tilt at windmills...

115 posted on 07/10/2007 10:07:32 AM PDT by ejonesie22 (Don't worry hippie, we'll defend you too. Now fetch my Cafe Mocha will you....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: WhiteGuy
ANY SOURCE?

You’re fracking kidding me, right? You’re willing to dismiss every member of the US Senate who voted in the Clinton trial for failing to remove him from office but you don’t know how to look up Senate votes?

Dear Lord in heaven.

116 posted on 07/10/2007 10:07:59 AM PDT by brothers4thID (FDT: "Every notice that while our problems are getting bigger, our politicians are getting smaller?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert; Gelato; CounterCounterCulture; outlawcam; Waywardson; Broadside; Taxman; ...
Because he believes abortion essentially should be a state matter, not a federal matter,

IOW, almost all abortions that occur today would still occur under FDT's "best case scenario."

The Reagan Republican platform, which Mr. Thompson has said he has no use for, calls for a Fourteenth Amendment recognition of the personhood of the unborn. IOW, the Grand Old Party, unlike Fred Thompson, believes that no state or individual has the right to murder the most defenseless and helpless among us.

"No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

117 posted on 07/10/2007 10:08:32 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Implement the FairTax and be free and prosperous, or stick with the StupidTax...it's up to you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder
CFR Membership Application

John Bolton is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, as is William F. Buckley, Jr.

118 posted on 07/10/2007 10:09:16 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert
Viguerie has proven himself to be an accurate and competent researcher and purveyor of factual information in the past.

New information uncovered by the Los Angeles Times indicates that Thompson has lobbied on behalf of an abortion rights organization.
As for accurate and competent, he was duped by bogus information in a LA Times article that has since been sanitized of some of the blatantly inaccurate information in an attempt to restore some credibility to the story. As it turns out, Mr. Thompson was not yet working for the lobbying firm while the firm was doing some lobbying for the organization in question. Apparently in his accurate and competent research, Mr. V failed to get the updated info.
119 posted on 07/10/2007 10:09:39 AM PDT by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I second that!


120 posted on 07/10/2007 10:10:10 AM PDT by PlainOleAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 1,141-1,149 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson