Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sara Taylor's lawyer says she's a pawn: White House staffer asks Sen. Leahy for compassion
Alaska Report News ^ | July 8, 2007 | Alaska Report News

Posted on 07/08/2007 9:47:45 AM PDT by rface

Washington, DC - The lawyer for former White House political director Sara Taylor -- who has been subpoenaed to testify before the senate this week about the firing of several U.S. attorneys -- sent a letter to Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vermont, asking that she not be used as "the focus of the constitutional struggle."

The former White House staffer is asking for compassion from the Senate Judiciary Committee in what may be another constitutional standoff between the legislative and executive branches, while the committee's Democratic chairman is sharpening his words.

"In our view, it is unfair to Ms. Taylor that this constitutional struggle might be played out with her as the object of an unseemly tug of war," wrote lawyer Neil Eggleston. He said that Taylor has done nothing wrong and would testify "without hesitation" if not for an expected order from the White House -- where she worked until six weeks ago -- that she not comply the subpoena.

Eggleston urged senators to focus any punitive action against the White House, not his client. He said Taylor was caught in a "monumental clash between the executive and legislative branches of government" that could ultimately be decided in the courts.

Sen. Leahy continued to press for Taylor's testimony and he fired away at the White House for what he called interference on the committee's investigation. "I hope the White House stops this stonewalling and accepts my offer to negotiate a workable solution to the Committee's oversight requests," he said in a written statement.

White House has publicly announced it would assert executive privilege in the case, directing Taylor and former White House counsel Harriet Miers, who also was subpoenaed, not to comply with the Senate's subpoenas.

White House spokeswoman Jeanie Mamo issued a response Saturday to Leahy. "Senator Leahy is seeking testimony related to Sara Taylor's duties as an aide to the President. The President is entitled to candid, confidential advice from his aides without the threat of compelled testimony from Congress," Mamo said.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: doj; leahy; sarataylor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 07/08/2007 9:47:48 AM PDT by rface
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rface
Compassion? From a dhimmocrat/liberal? bwahahahaha

Sorry, you're not a consitutionally-protected grievance-class of legal/illegal citizen.

2 posted on 07/08/2007 9:50:20 AM PDT by kromike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

Just another attempt by RATS to swing the 2008 election.


3 posted on 07/08/2007 9:52:18 AM PDT by freespirited (Mr. President, PUT UP THE WALL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kromike
Leahy is probably looking for a little "compassion" himself eh.

Guy is scum.

4 posted on 07/08/2007 9:52:50 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
Just another attempt by RATS to swing steal the 2008 election.
5 posted on 07/08/2007 9:58:42 AM PDT by Perdogg (This thread is 100% Immigration and Gluten free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rface
Leahy? Compassion? This gal must be delusional.
6 posted on 07/08/2007 10:03:05 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative ("The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism."-Karl Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

From an article in the NYT:

“The lawyer for a former White House aide told lawmakers Saturday that he expected the Bush administration to try to block the aide from testifying about the dismissals of 93 United States attorneys.”

94????????


7 posted on 07/08/2007 10:07:34 AM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ("Don't touch that thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

She should appear and simply say that US Attorneys serve at the pleasure of the President and know, when they take the job, that they can be replaced at any time for any reason whatsoever, or no reason at all. And she should respond to EVERY question with that same answer. It is truthful, and answers the question, no matter how silly the question may be; it is always the correct answer.


8 posted on 07/08/2007 10:12:16 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

She and all Bush administration officials should plead the 5th to every question. If she testifies a single lapse in recollection will result in an indictment ala Scooter Libby.


9 posted on 07/08/2007 10:16:55 AM PDT by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ

I think you hit a home run with your suggestion of what she should say and do.


10 posted on 07/08/2007 10:23:25 AM PDT by basil (Support the Second Amendment--buy another gun today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

I think they got Clinton’s firings mixed up with Bush. The President fired 8 US attorneys.


11 posted on 07/08/2007 10:30:11 AM PDT by 4yearlurker (Liberals, A terrorists best friend!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rface

At long last, Sen Leahy, have you no decency?


12 posted on 07/08/2007 10:35:25 AM PDT by Paine in the Neck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4yearlurker
“The President fired 8 US attorneys.” I know, but it’s the NYT! I don’t think they’re mixed up. It was probably on purpose. I’m personally going to run the number up to 98 right now!
13 posted on 07/08/2007 10:53:46 AM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ("Don't touch that thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 4yearlurker

Then it should be those firings she should testify about.


14 posted on 07/08/2007 10:55:34 AM PDT by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 4yearlurker

Yeah, someone doesn’t know their facts. It was the Clintons with 93 firings.


15 posted on 07/08/2007 11:12:13 AM PDT by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rface

I know Sara. She’s basically a good kid. Sorry to see her get sucked into this cynical, meaningless Dem political stunt.

Nothing worse than those who use their governmental power to abuse and harrass individuals.


16 posted on 07/08/2007 11:17:59 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Implement the FairTax and be free and prosperous, or stick with the StupidTax...it's up to you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freekitty
It had to be at least one reporter, one editor, and one proofreader. I’m sayin’ they made the “mistake” on purpose!
17 posted on 07/08/2007 11:25:56 AM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ("Don't touch that thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

I agree.


18 posted on 07/08/2007 11:38:59 AM PDT by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
I know Sara. She’s basically a good kid. Sorry to see her get sucked into this cynical, meaningless Dem political stunt.

Then what should she be scared of??? There is NOTHING she can say about any criminal act because there wasn't one...And futhermore she should in no way be intimidated by a gov't OF the people, FOR the people and BY the people!

Just tell them all to go pound sound!!

19 posted on 07/08/2007 11:53:18 AM PDT by sirchtruth (No one has the RIGHT not to be offended...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: rface

Sara Taylor is bright eyed and bushy tailed. She’ll land on her feet. If I was a Senator I’d sure help out the little cutie


20 posted on 07/08/2007 11:57:25 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson