Skip to comments.
AK-47 inventor: I don't lose sleep
AP ^
| June 6th, 2007
| By MANSUR MIROVALEV, Associated Press Writer
Posted on 07/06/2007 2:24:48 PM PDT by Eurotwit
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-120 next last
To: Tallguy
21
posted on
07/06/2007 2:43:03 PM PDT
by
Hoplite
To: RasterMaster
The weapon of choice for our enemies....of course he doesnt lose sleep
Why should he?
Do you think Eugene Stoner should have lost sleep for inventing the AR series of weapons?
A tool is a tool. The maker of the tool is not responsible for the uses that tool are put to.
22
posted on
07/06/2007 2:44:47 PM PDT
by
Dr.Zoidberg
(Mohammedanism - Bringing you only the best of the 6th century for fourteen hundred years.)
To: Dr.Zoidberg
...tool are put...
...tool is put...
23
posted on
07/06/2007 2:46:36 PM PDT
by
Dr.Zoidberg
(Mohammedanism - Bringing you only the best of the 6th century for fourteen hundred years.)
To: Tallguy
He didn’t recover quickly from his wounds. He began work on the thing late in the war, and didn’t finish the design until 1947. Of course he saw the M1 and the StG44. Of course he took into account what he could learn from observing those weapons and from accounts of their field performance.
The beauty of the AK47 design is that the damned thing works. It doesn’t have to be kept spotless. It doesn’t take a natural -born mechanic to keep it in working order in the field. And it doesn’t need to be real accurate since most infantry combat either is at point-blank range, or involves firing in the general direction of an imperfectly spotted enemy.
24
posted on
07/06/2007 2:47:02 PM PDT
by
lostlakehiker
(Not So Fast There)
To: dfwgator
Hey dfwgator,
I saw you beat Mexico in the Gold Cup.
Good going.
Good luck to Freddy Adu and the boys in the u-20 world cup in Canada!
Beat those darned Brazilians. :-)
Cheers.
25
posted on
07/06/2007 2:48:35 PM PDT
by
Eurotwit
(WI - CSC)
To: Sybeck1
What caliber is it?
7.62mm x 39mm. Muzzle velocity of approximately 2300 feet per second. Despite claims of its low accuracy, it is way more than sufficient to shoot a man size target reliably at ranges that most combat engagements occur at. Lightweight, extraordinarily durable. You can throw it in a creek and come back a week later, pick it up, and start shooting it.
26
posted on
07/06/2007 2:54:15 PM PDT
by
JamesP81
(Keep your friends close; keep your enemies at optimal engagement range)
To: Tallguy
The M-1 was designed in 1924 and was standard US Army issue by 1936. Why wouldn’t he be able to get one? We had open trade routes to Russia in 41. Kalashnikov has consistently denied that his design was based on the German StG44.
To: Sybeck1
And the M-16 is closer to a .22 right?
It is .22 caliber. Or, more precisely, it's .223 caliber.
28
posted on
07/06/2007 2:55:20 PM PDT
by
JamesP81
(Keep your friends close; keep your enemies at optimal engagement range)
To: Eurotwit
Darn fine weapon.
29
posted on
07/06/2007 2:56:48 PM PDT
by
Caipirabob
(Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: Eurotwit
Well, he can always set up the Kalashnikov Peace Prize fund for future generations...
30
posted on
07/06/2007 2:57:02 PM PDT
by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
To: lostlakehiker
The Russians are the masters of the simple solution. I read that German rifles froze up during the siege of Stalingrad because their gun oil turned into glue at the low temperatures. The Russians mixed gasoline into their gun oil and the problem was solved.
31
posted on
07/06/2007 2:57:17 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Greed is NOT a conservative ideal.)
To: xrp
Kalashnikov was against the 5.4mm round, stating that it had less stopping power as the original 7.62mm. He was over ruled by the Soviet designers who thought why should the US adopt a 5.56mm round if it is too small. It turns out in Iraq the 5.56mm is too small. The soldier may be able to carry more 5.56mm versus the larger 7.62mm round, but if it takes three direct hits to drop the target versus one hit from a 7.62mm, the advantage of carrying more smaller rounds become moot.
32
posted on
07/06/2007 2:57:47 PM PDT
by
Fee
( R)
To: Eurotwit
I have mine... 5.56/.223
Converted it from the hunter version on the 4th of July... yes I did use the proper number of domestic parts, and yes it only fires one shot for one pull of the trigger...
To: Radio_Silence
The AK was ranked ahead of the M16 on the history/military channel show on top 10 rifles. This was due primarily to number of units manufactured - not because it is a better design. Eugene Stoner the inventor of the M16 was also a WWII vet. He served with the Marines in the Pacific theatre. He also designed the Stoner weapon system, an earlier version of the M16. He died in 1997 and is buried at Quantico, VA.
34
posted on
07/06/2007 3:03:02 PM PDT
by
BluH2o
To: RasterMaster
“The weapon of choice for our enemies....of course he doesnt lose sleep.”
Right, I am sure he was working on weapon design in the early 1940’s worrying about the Americans, and I am just as sure he had a single ounce of control over what was done with this weapon once it went into production over all of the last 60 years, with all the licensee countries.
To: Sybeck1
Standard Russian ammo for the AK-47 is .311 caliber, 123 gr. U.S. made 7.62x39 is .308 caliber. The AK-47 is fine with either one. Ditto for the Ruger Mini-30. Not so for the Thompson 7.62x39 barrel. It MUST be used only with U.S. made 7.62x39 in .308 caliber.
36
posted on
07/06/2007 3:14:02 PM PDT
by
Myrddin
To: Eurotwit
“”The Kalashnikov rifle is a symbol of the creative genius of our people,” President Vladimir Putin said in a statement read to Kalashnikov at the ceremony in the Central Russian Army Museum. “
Almost anything I have ever seen from the soviet union was shoddy, but their small arms program in the 40’s and 50’s was simply stunning in the number, simplicity, and reliability of the weapons that were offered. I own a several examples of these and the only one I am not enamoored of is the SVT-40.
To: JamesP81
Most "off the shelf" .223 ammo is loaded with a .224 caliber bullet. The .223 size is also available and often necessary when reloading a 5.7x28 case to prevent crushing the case neck upon reloading. Typical weights for the ".223" caliber range from 55 to 62 gr. The heaviest I've seen are 80 gr. That takes a 1:7 rifling to stabilize. The lightest bullets are typically 40 gr and best stabilized in a 1:14 twist rate. The .22LR round (rimfire) is offered in 36/38/40 gr with a typical 1:12 twist rate.
38
posted on
07/06/2007 3:19:09 PM PDT
by
Myrddin
To: MD_Willington_1976
What is the base model for that rifle? I have a VEPR K in 5.45x39mm I love it. There is almost no recoil what so ever. It also has never had a single feed/eject issue in the 3 years I’ve had it.
To: Dr.Zoidberg; WoofDog123
Just making a comparison about Russia & USSR in respect to weapons exports to our enemies.....why would they lose sleep?
It is an effective weapon and in demand for the terrorist or communist regimes which Russia continues to support.
40
posted on
07/06/2007 3:21:18 PM PDT
by
RasterMaster
(Rudy, Romney & McCain = KENNEDY wing of the Republican Party - Duncan Hunter, President 2008)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-120 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson