Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Alleged madam can distribute records
AP ^ | 6 July 07 | LUBNA TAKRURI

Posted on 07/05/2007 10:38:05 PM PDT by leadpenny

53 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - A woman accused of running a prostitution ring in the nation's capital is free to distribute thousands of pages of phone records after a federal judge lifted a restraining order on Thursday.

U.S. District Court Judge Gladys Kessler's order granted the request of Deborah Jeane Palfrey, 51, of Vallejo, Calif., to quash restrictions by government prosecutors that prohibited her from giving away the list.

"As a result, Jeane has determined to release those records under certain conditions to qualified individuals or organizations," wrote her attorney, Montgomery Blair Sibley, in an e-mail.

Palfrey and her attorney have said the list contains up to 15,000 names and could shake up Washington by revealing high-profile individuals.

Prosecutors had won two temporary restraining orders to prevent her from distributing the list, first to preserve its availability, and then to prevent the harassment of potential witnesses through its distribution.

But prosecutors' arguments did not hold up, the judge ruled. The availability of the list is not in jeopardy and it was not seized or listed with her other assets that were subject to forfeiture, Kessler wrote.

Freezing "the personal property of an individual, not yet convicted of any crime" would be an extraordinary step, the requirements of which government prosecutors failed to satisfy, the judge wrote.

Palfrey is facing federal racketeering and conspiracy charges for running what she says was a legal escort service. Prosecutors say the business netted more than $2 million from 1993 to 2006.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: corruption; cultureofcorruption; dcmadame; govwatch; mediabias; palfrey; privacy; prostitution; racketeering; rico
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 07/05/2007 10:38:07 PM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: leadpenny

Should we care?


2 posted on 07/05/2007 10:42:57 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker ( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

We?

Depends on what you have in your pocket?


3 posted on 07/05/2007 10:45:34 PM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

If she only releases names from the right side of the aisle, yes.


4 posted on 07/05/2007 10:58:05 PM PDT by skr (Car bombs and IEDs are the exclamation marks for the latest Democrats' talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: everyone

I for one am very interested.

Prostitution is against the law. I’m not a straight libertarian and I see both porn and whores as ruining good men. When the good men are ruined, everything socially goes downhill.

I’d like to know who’s in the prostitution trap, because I don’t want them in power.


5 posted on 07/05/2007 11:02:29 PM PDT by Marie2 (I used to be disgusted. . .now I try to be amused.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: skr
If she only releases names from the right side of the aisle, yes.

She won't. She'll sell names to bidders, NBC, ABC, CNN, CBS, etc......... they'll release nomes on the right.

6 posted on 07/05/2007 11:03:17 PM PDT by umgud ("When illegals are banned, only greedy businesses and welfare providers will have them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny

ABC Disney News isn’t going to be happy. They cheered when they got to leak a low level member of the Bush Administration. Now the floodgates open (they’ve held their own copy of the list but played partisan politics and said the “rest” were a bunch of “nobodies”).


7 posted on 07/05/2007 11:11:25 PM PDT by weegee (If the Fairness Doctrine is imposed on USA who will CNN news get to read the conservative rebuttal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny

Should be published on the internet so wives and girfriends of all these dogs in DC can look at the list. Time for a major house cleaning in washington. If thisn helps to get rid of the scum then lets use it.


8 posted on 07/05/2007 11:17:23 PM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1859586/posts
D.C. madam vows to release records (Threatens White House)
Times-Herald ^ | 07/01/2007 | MATTHIAS GAFNI

Posted on 07/02/2007 10:12:17 AM EDT by tlb


9 posted on 07/05/2007 11:25:42 PM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tlb

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1799966/posts
Alleged Vallejo madam agrees to share phone records (Washington, DC Clients)
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | March 12, 2007 | Henry K. Lee

Posted on 03/13/2007 5:07:11 AM EDT by tlb


10 posted on 07/05/2007 11:28:14 PM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mmanager; SmithL

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1802181/posts
Judge: Accused ‘D.C. Madam’ can’t sell records
Associated Press ^ | Friday, March 16, 2007 | A/P

Posted on 03/16/2007 9:36:29 PM EDT by mmanager


11 posted on 07/05/2007 11:32:01 PM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny

Ruh Roh guys ... you’re screwed .... er, ... I mean .... ne’er mind.


12 posted on 07/05/2007 11:40:56 PM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knarf
What you meant to say, perhaps, was: ''Rut roh, guys, you screwed, and now you're about to get f***ed.''

Washington D.C. : 78 square miles, surrounded by reality.

13 posted on 07/06/2007 12:09:55 AM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: weegee

Now THAT would be worth a few furious E-Mails if it is determined that there were more than a few somebodies on the list! There are going to be two sets of names uncovered - the clients AND the providers!


14 posted on 07/06/2007 1:00:05 AM PDT by Enterprise (I can't talk about liberals anymore because some of the words will get me sent to rehab.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker
Should we care?

Of course we should. Our favorite politicians may be on her list.

I can't wait to see how many congress critters get busted. I'm sure there will be some nervous politicians in DC tomorrow. LOL

15 posted on 07/06/2007 1:05:05 AM PDT by NRA2BFree ("The time is near at hand which must determine whether Americans are to be free men or slaves!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

Dear Jeane:

Please misspell my name.


16 posted on 07/06/2007 4:08:31 AM PDT by shove_it
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

For some reason lefty blogs have been spreading a rumor that Cheney might be involved in this.


17 posted on 07/06/2007 4:12:27 AM PDT by coorsdark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Marie2

It all depends upon your definition of a good man.


18 posted on 07/06/2007 6:24:28 AM PDT by seemoAR (Absolute power corrupts absolutely)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: coorsdark

I’m sure the moonbats blame Cheney for the black plague too, so claiming he’s on the list isn’t too far of a stretch for them.


19 posted on 07/06/2007 6:27:51 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (Press 1 for English, press 2 for deport)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: coorsdark

Only because they might have paid Cheney to sire quality offspring :)

/ sarcasm


20 posted on 07/06/2007 6:34:38 AM PDT by SShultz460
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson