Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Excellent synopsis.
1 posted on 07/03/2007 5:39:59 AM PDT by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
To: Quilla

Truth be known, the truth cannot and will never be told about the wmd’s. We know the wmd’s were there, so where are the wmd’s now?


2 posted on 07/03/2007 5:47:36 AM PDT by From One - Many (Trust the Old Media At Your Own Risk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Quilla
Bill Clinton, John Kerry, and other Democrats, all saw the same intelligence back when Clinton was President and George Tenet headed the CIA. They all claimed Iraq had WMD which threatened America. If there really were no WMD, why are they not held equally accountable for misleading the American people?

I actually have had several moonbats answer this for me. Their response is
"They didn't invade/start a war/etc".

The democrats making the same assertions are held blameless because....
They were too GUTLESS to do anything about it. That's the answer.

3 posted on 07/03/2007 5:52:01 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Quilla

It would not surprise me that there is general agreement amongst the highest level of the gubermint, both parties, that the real answer would scare the bejeebus out of the world and therefore must remain a deepest, darkest secret. It probably has something to do with international blackmail and sets of missiles retargeted in a kind of doomsday scenario. Only explanation that fits.


4 posted on 07/03/2007 5:52:30 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (Brian J. Marotta, 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub, (1948-2007) Rest In Peace, our FRiend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Quilla

I still maintain that WMD’s were moved to Syria and are still there. FGS the History Channel had night vision photos of a massive amount of trucks moving from Iraq to Syria before the war broke out. Haven’t been able to source that footage since then. They also had photos of the underground labs.


5 posted on 07/03/2007 5:53:01 AM PDT by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Quilla

3. Massive amounts of WMD were removed to known locations in Syria just prior to the war.

Does anyone remember seeing the satellite footage of the caravans of Iraqi military vehicles heading to Syria which was shown in the weeks before we went to war in Iraq? The muteness of the Bush administration from the time this criticism started is frustrating.


6 posted on 07/03/2007 5:53:25 AM PDT by Bluebird Singing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Quilla

“One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line.” - President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
“If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction program.” - President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face.” - Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998
“He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten time since 1983.” - Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18,1998
“[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq’s refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs.” - Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin (D-MI), Tom Daschle (D-SD), John Kerry( D - MA), and others Oct. 9,1998
“Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process.” - Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
“Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies.” - Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
“There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies.” - Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, December 5, 2001
“We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandated of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them.” - Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002
“We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country.” - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
“Iraq’s search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power.” - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
“We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction.” - Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
“The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons...” - Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002
“I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force— if necessary— to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security.” - Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9,2002
“There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction.”- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002
“He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do” - Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002
“In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weap ons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members.. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons.” - Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
“We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction.” - Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002
“Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America’s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real” - Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003


7 posted on 07/03/2007 5:54:21 AM PDT by Clam Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Quilla

Bookmarked


8 posted on 07/03/2007 5:56:47 AM PDT by chaosagent (Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Quilla

the reason this all remains a mystery is George Bush. He is dense when it comes to rallying the public to this cause. There is no explanation of the convoys headed to Syria, or any other odd circumstances in Iraq. Additionally, there was no leadership in the Senate. Why weren’t there hearings? The drive-bys have gelded the President and the Senate Republicans.


9 posted on 07/03/2007 5:58:57 AM PDT by cdcdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Quilla

Hell, yes!!!

Why do you think the Iraqis and their allies here and in Europe kept stalling and demanding revisions of UN resolutions?

“It’s on the wrong size paper!”

“It wasn’t properly reviewed!”

“We need another procedural vote!”

What do you think they were doing? BUYING TIME!!!!
And don’t give me this garbage about how the Iraqis and Syrians or whomever “don’t like each other”, so they wouldn’t send any weapons there. Doesn’t anybody realize that the expression “the enemy of my enemy is my friend” originated in the middle east?

This topic sets me off every time it comes up. People, especially the “press”, are just so damn stupid.


11 posted on 07/03/2007 6:02:27 AM PDT by GadareneDemoniac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Quilla

I’m certain that there WERE WMD in Iraq. And instead of being so eager to show-off Saddam Hussein being captured in his spider hole on live TV, it might have made more sense to rendition him elsewhere and waterboard him until he told the truth about where he sent ‘em.

He could always have been “captured” later on “live” TV, with no impact to the final outcome.

My bet is he sent them to Syria.


18 posted on 07/03/2007 6:09:24 AM PDT by DieHard the Hunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Quilla
“Some even charge that the Bush Administration deliberately, and knowingly, misled the nation with false information as a pretext to justify going to war.”

LMAO... some??!!!

Half the Dhimmicrat party and all of the DBM have been saying this for years!

30 posted on 07/03/2007 6:29:45 AM PDT by johnny7 ("But that one on the far left... he had crazy eyes")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Quilla

Saddam Hussein WAS a WMD.


35 posted on 07/03/2007 6:36:33 AM PDT by dfwgator (The University of Florida - Still Championship U)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jveritas

How many documents have been released?


38 posted on 07/03/2007 6:38:20 AM PDT by Eagle of Liberty (The United States of America is the only country strong enough to go it alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Quilla; jveritas; ikez78

Thanks for posting; pings.


44 posted on 07/03/2007 6:55:36 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Quilla

Ping for reference WMD’s


49 posted on 07/03/2007 7:09:35 AM PDT by BreezyDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Quilla
I for one have never doubted that Saddam had mass quantities of WMD and the equipment to make more, and that they were moved and/or buried before the war.

Just about every prominent Democrat believed and stated this also. For them to now claim that "Bush lied" and there was deception is hypocrisy.

"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." -- Nancy Pelosi, December 16, 1998

"(W)e need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime. We all know the litany of his offenses. He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. ...And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. That is why the world, through the United Nations Security Council, has spoken with one voice, demanding that Iraq disclose its weapons programs and disarm. So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but it is not new. It has been with us since the end of the Persian Gulf War." -- John Kerry, Jan 23, 2003

"There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein's regime is a serious danger, that he is a tyrant, and that his pursuit of lethal weapons of mass destruction cannot be tolerated. He must be disarmed." -- Ted Kennedy, Sept 27, 2002

"Iraq does pose a serious threat to the stability of the Persian Gulf and we should organize an international coalition to eliminate his access to weapons of mass destruction. Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to completely deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." -- Al Gore, 2002

"The debate over Iraq is not about politics. It is about national security. It should be clear that our national security requires Congress to send a clear message to Iraq and the world: America is united in its determination to eliminate forever the threat of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction." -- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

"Iraq is not the only nation in the world to possess weapons of mass destruction, but it is the only nation with a leader who has used them against his own people." -- Tom Daschle in 1998

"I am absolutely convinced that there are weapons...I saw evidence back in 1998 when we would see the inspectors being barred from gaining entry into a warehouse for three hours with trucks rolling up and then moving those trucks out." -- Clinton's Secretary of Defense William Cohen in April of 2003

"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow." -- Bill Clinton in 1998

"There's no question that Saddam Hussein is a threat... Yes, he has chemical and biological weapons. He's had those for a long time. But the United States right now is on a very much different defensive posture than we were before September 11th of 2001... He is, as far as we know, actively pursuing nuclear capabilities, though he doesn't have nuclear warheads yet. If he were to acquire nuclear weapons, I think our friends in the region would face greatly increased risks as would we." -- Wesley Clark on September 26, 2002

"Saddam's goal ... is to achieve the lifting of U.N. sanctions while retaining and enhancing Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs. We cannot, we must not and we will not let him succeed." -- Madeline Albright, 1998

"(Saddam) will rebuild his arsenal of weapons of mass destruction and some day, some way, I am certain he will use that arsenal again, as he has 10 times since 1983" -- National Security Adviser Sandy Berger, Feb 18, 1998

"Iraq made commitments after the Gulf War to completely dismantle all weapons of mass destruction, and unfortunately, Iraq has not lived up to its agreement." -- Barbara Boxer, November 8, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retained some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capability. Intelligence reports also indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons, but has not yet achieved nuclear capability." -- Robert Byrd, October 2002

"Saddam Hussein's regime represents a grave threat to America and our allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two decades, Saddam Hussein has sought weapons of mass destruction through every available means. We know that he has chemical and biological weapons. He has already used them against his neighbors and his own people, and is trying to build more. We know that he is doing everything he can to build nuclear weapons, and we know that each day he gets closer to achieving that goal." -- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." -- Bob Graham, December 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." -- Ted Kennedy, September 27, 2002

"I will be voting to give the president of the United States the authority to use force - if necessary - to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." -- John F. Kerry, Oct 2002

56 posted on 07/03/2007 7:26:42 AM PDT by Sender (Success in warfare is gained by carefully accommodating ourselves to the enemy's purpose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Quilla

I agree, however, stockpiled WMDs were never considered the threat to America that many think.

The threat to America was always smaller amounts of WMDs delivered by suicidal terrorists.

Saddam ALWAYS retained the capability AND RECIPES to make small quantities of WMDs that could be handed off to terrorists.


60 posted on 07/03/2007 7:35:41 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Quilla

Last year General Sada spoke at our church. He described how Saddam had shipped the WMD to Syria by using airplanes that were full of “humanitarian aid” for Syria after they had a massive earthquake. Of course, there was no “aid”, just WMD.

He had no intention of writing a book until the foiled attack on Jordan. Do you remember that there were tons of Sarin gas that they were planning on releasing? General Sada realized that they (whoever it was who was going to attack Jordan) had found the Iraqi WMD in the Syrian desert and were using those. The general figured he had better expose all of this for the safety of the world. By the way, he had previously told the US government about it, but they seemed to do nothing with the info.


63 posted on 07/03/2007 7:40:51 AM PDT by Grammy ("Ms Pelosi is a very difficult person to embarrass." Fred Thompson, 4/11/07)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Quilla

I’m so sick of the BS over this. We let Saddam Hussein know months ahead of time we were coming, for weeks we observed transport of materials out of Iraq. Duh.


67 posted on 07/03/2007 8:18:12 AM PDT by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Quilla

bump


68 posted on 07/03/2007 8:20:13 AM PDT by Christian4Bush ("Polls are for strippers and liberals." Caller to Rush, 6/5/2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson