Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Quilla

It would not surprise me that there is general agreement amongst the highest level of the gubermint, both parties, that the real answer would scare the bejeebus out of the world and therefore must remain a deepest, darkest secret. It probably has something to do with international blackmail and sets of missiles retargeted in a kind of doomsday scenario. Only explanation that fits.


4 posted on 07/03/2007 5:52:30 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (Brian J. Marotta, 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub, (1948-2007) Rest In Peace, our FRiend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: NonValueAdded
We've been through this already:

1) Iraq had WMD's.

2) Putin helped Saddam remove them to Syria before the invasion.

3) Bush took the "No WMD's in Iraq" domestic political hit to defend Putin's image, fearing the consequences of having the Russian nuclear arsenal fall into the hands of a Zhirinovsky-type fascist would be much worse.

4) No one thinks Syria is dumb enough to use Iraq's WMD's (mostly chemical warheads) in any way - but having them makes Bashar Assad feel like a "player", so everyone has agreed to leave him to his delusions.

10 posted on 07/03/2007 6:02:25 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ("Wise men don't need to debate; men who need to debate are not wise." -- Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson