Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Special prosecutor challenges Bush assertion about Libby sentence (Fitzfong hissy fit)
Associated Press ^ | 3 July 07 | None listed

Posted on 07/03/2007 2:51:27 AM PDT by SkyPilot

WASHINGTON (AP) - Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald is disputing President Bush's assertion that the 30-month prison sentence given to former White House aide Lewis "Scooter" Libby was "excessive."

That was 1 of the reasons the president cited in commuting the sentence hours after a federal appeals court ruled that Libby could not remain free while fighting the case.

Fitzgerald said in a statement that Libby was sentenced under the same laws as other criminals. He also said "It is fundamental to the rule of law that all citizens stand before the bar of justice as equals."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: cialeak; fitzfong; joewilson; libby; patrickfitzgerald
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
"It is fundamental to the rule of law that all citizens stand before the bar of justice as equals."

Ha!

What a joke. Fitzfong abused his position. When called on it, suddenly it is "all about him." He knows he was over zealous and prosecuted a man over his memory vs. that of Timmy Russert - and thinks that is justice?

Hey Fitzy - if this is true:

"It is fundamental to the rule of law that all citizens stand before the bar of justice as equals."

Then when are you going to go after Joe Wilson for blantantly lying? He lied so much even the bipartisan 911 Commission said so.

1 posted on 07/03/2007 2:51:28 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

"Remember my media pals - it's all about me."

2 posted on 07/03/2007 2:53:01 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
Yep. Or does your concept of "equal justice" extend only to Republicans? Why don't you go after Democrats who commit perjury. Then we'll see you aren't just another hack partisan peosecutor with an axe to grind.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

3 posted on 07/03/2007 2:58:34 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

What’s his opinion about Sandy Berger then?
Equal my @ss.


4 posted on 07/03/2007 3:01:59 AM PDT by visualops (artlife.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

The essence of the "case:"

"Prosecutor Fitzgerald, on that morning, I went for a jog around the White House running track. Then I had a bagel for breakfast, and I called VP Cheney. I can assure you that neither he, not I, never spoke to Joe Wilson - ever. I certainly never spoke to Wilson about us sending him on some 'special mission' to Niger either."

"Is that TRUE Mr. Russert?"

"No no no! First, Libby told me he had an English muffin for breakfast. So, first off...that's not true. Then, Libby said Cheney never spoke to Wilson, but they met at the Washington Hilton during a political dinner once, so there again, Libby isn't telling the same story I am. I have to tell the truth you know - I am a highly respected journalist."

"AHA!"

5 posted on 07/03/2007 3:02:42 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

It was a political lynching.

Bush did the right thing - this guy is no criminal. A pardon would have been better, but he’ll get that on appeal.

WHERE IS SANDY BURGER??????


6 posted on 07/03/2007 3:06:59 AM PDT by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

The essence of the “case:”

That’s good! I like it!


7 posted on 07/03/2007 3:07:07 AM PDT by caver (Yes, I did crawl out of a hole in the ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: visualops
Well, Sandy "Pants" Berger wasn't his charter, but you're right - Fitzfong sets himself up for mocking with that "justice for all" statement. He was trying to take the "high road" and sound like President Lincoln or something. He is a narcissist.

Fitzfong wouldn't get fawning media attention for going after someone like Sandy - or any Democrat. He knows it. When Bush used the word "excessive" - Fitzfong got itchy. He wants to use this case as a stepping stone for his career and a "place in history" and he knows further scrutiny could harm him.

8 posted on 07/03/2007 3:08:08 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
If Fitzgerald really was following his own statement...

“It is fundamental to the rule of law that all citizens stand before the bar of justice as equals.”

then he should have charged Richard Armitage about one month into his investigation (his mission was complete). Instead, he spent years mucking around until he could get a White House scalp... What President Bush did was the right thing and I really believe he will follow up with a pardon when the time is right.

9 posted on 07/03/2007 3:18:34 AM PDT by RedEyeJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: caver; ZULU
Here is what really galls me about Fitzfong:

During the trial, he said in his opening remarks this case was not about the Iraq War. Then, he said it was during his closing arguments!

Then, he argued more about the Iraq War during sentencing!!!

Dana Milbank of the Washington Compost had an orgasm while covering Fitzfong:

"That is a very, very serious matter," said Fitzgerald, 44, licking his lips frequently and moving his eyes back and forth across the line of eight cameras. "The truth is the engine of our judicial system, and if you compromise the truth, the whole process is lost." Fitzie, as some pals call him, came straight from prosecutorial central casting: He spoke with a street-tough Brooklyn accent and laid out his case with the matter-of-fact assurance of a police captain explaining how his officers gained entrance to the premises and apprehended the suspect. Seldom glancing at notes and eschewing stage makeup, Fitzgerald expressed amusement with the attention he's getting ("I think someone interviewed the person who shined my shoes the other day") and a fierce determination to stay within what he called the "four corners of the indictment." Asked to compare his probe with that of Watergate or the Monica Lewinsky matter, he replied: "I don't even know how to answer that. I'm just going to take a dive."

10 posted on 07/03/2007 3:21:09 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Hey Fitzy:

If there were any real justice in this case, you would be disbarred and put in prison for unlawful prosecution and persecution. And then you would be sued in Civil court for the recovery of the millions and millions of dollars you cost Libby and the taxpayers for this debacle.


11 posted on 07/03/2007 3:23:51 AM PDT by LegendHasIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RedEyeJack
then he should have charged Richard Armitage about one month into his investigation (his mission was complete). Instead, he spent years mucking around until he could get a White House scalp...

That is EXACTLY right. It is also one fact that "Fitzy" (as his friends call him - doesn't that sound cute?) does not want examined with any scrutiny because he knows the facts make him look bad.

12 posted on 07/03/2007 3:23:56 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

In the past, when Bush made some statements that have been challenged by others he always has more facts and arguments after the person has their public hissy fit.


13 posted on 07/03/2007 3:29:14 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LegendHasIt
If there were any real justice in this case, you would be disbarred and put in prison for unlawful prosecution and persecution.


14 posted on 07/03/2007 3:29:48 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

This is breathtaking.

Fitzgerald should be prosecuted for that witchunt and spend time in jail himself.


15 posted on 07/03/2007 3:35:58 AM PDT by rlmorel (Liberals: If the Truth would help them, they would use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
Let's not forget Judge Reggie Walton.

He would not let memory experts testify in the defense.

Then, during sentencing, he was given letters by 12 legal scholars saying the trial was flawed and Libby was not given justice.

Walton mocked the legal scholars in open court. He said the letters were "not something I would expect of a first year law student."

Really? He was and it a terrible judge. His instructions to the jury were so confusing, that even they had keep going back to him for clarification.

Also, let us not forget the stacked jury in all of this. It was filled with DC Democrats - one of whom was a former Washington Post reporter and best friends with Bob Woodward!!

16 posted on 07/03/2007 3:42:32 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

It makes me angry.

I do think President Bush made the right move...not a full pardon. Even though I would have enjoyed seeing him do it just to poke a finger in the eyes of the liberals, I know by now he is not really interested in doing that.

I think Mr. Libby will get a lot of money in his account (I donated at www.scooterlibby.com, and I know a lot of other people will as well) and under a different judge in a different venue, will be completely exonerated.

In my mind, that is preferable.


17 posted on 07/03/2007 3:48:03 AM PDT by rlmorel (Liberals: If the Truth would help them, they would use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Once a thief, forever a thief
What you want you always steal!
You would trade your life for mine.
Yes, Valjean, you want a deal!
Shoot me now for all I care!
If you let me go, beware,
You’ll still answer to Javert!


18 posted on 07/03/2007 3:59:17 AM PDT by unspun (Acknowledgment of God affords life, popular & national sovereignty, liberty, responsibility)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Good for you for putting the spotlight on Judge Walton — not one of W’s finest appointments, it turns out. And where’s the picture of the Jury Foreman (former Wash Post journalist, I recall) who walked the jury through the all the legal complexities to find this guilty verdict. I’m sure that guy is in the process of having his memoirs published for big $ — and he’s just another hack journalist with an axe to grind.


19 posted on 07/03/2007 3:59:42 AM PDT by ReleaseTheHounds ("You ask, 'What is our aim?' I can answer in one word: VICTORY - victory - at all costs...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: All
Two questions:

(1) I am under the impression that no one under oath made the claim that Valerie Plame was covert. Does anyone have link to a source which confirms or denies this?

(2) What exactly did Libby say that got him entangled in the perjury trap?

20 posted on 07/03/2007 4:07:09 AM PDT by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson