[Kitten Festival]

So what do you have to say for yourself, Hillary?

[SWAMPSNIPER]

So, Rudy is right on this, doesn’t change the fact that Rudy is a hopeless butthole! Rudy is in no position to criticize anyone!

[EagleUSA]

She would not even let herself get near a question about that issue. She would not show up for the debate, unless her handlers were assured she would not get the question. The Clinton reality is nothing like ours....terminal narcissism.

[Popman]

she'll also have to explain her husband's muted — no, nonexistent — response to repeated terrorist attacks on U.S. targets here and abroad, starting with the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center.

As much as I think Hillary Presidency is about the worst thing that can happen to this country, laying at her feet, the feeble inaction of her POTUS husband is a bit disingenuous.

Bottom line, it is the POTUS job, the country elected Bubba, not Hillary to defend the country.

It's a fair question to ask her what she would have done differently, if she had the oval office officially.

Rooty is grasping at straws

[ladyinred]

As bin Laden said in a 1998 interview: "America assumed the titles of world leader and master of the new world order. After a few blows, it forgot all about those titles and rushed out of Somalia in shame and disgrace, dragging the bodies of its soldiers."

This IMHO, is the real legacy of the Clinton administration. However, Hillary will not have to answer for it. That is dreaming Rudy.

[Pining_4_TX]

Does he suggest any particular country we should have invaded then? Rudy is all tough talk, but the terrorism problem is best handled by FBI, CIA, etc. That is what should have happened in 1993. It failed, in part due to the Clinton admin keeping the CIA and FBI from sharing info and from that administration’s general lack of interest in anything other than having a good time in the oval office.

I do think it odd for a person to care about the lives of only those Americans who have made it safely out of the womb.

[Bullish]

Do you think he might ask her why Sandy Burglar was caught stuffing top secret documents in his socks and pants? And does she think like some other Clintonistas that Sandy was always just disorganized and messy?

Phooey!

[BuffaloJack]

The Clintons did not lull us into war.
The Clintons oblivioused us into war.
They were too clueless and distracted with interns, back room deals, back stabbing, and spying on political opponents to even see what was going on in the world. To lull us in would imply that they knew what was happening and wanted the public ignorant of the dangers present because they thought we couldn’t deal with it. I’d rather have a sneaky bastard in office that tells us nothing is going on, all the while he’s effectively dealing with the problems and protecting us, than a couple of self indulgent incompetent pretty people oblivious to everything around them that doesn’t advance their position or personal fortunes.

[Uncle Chip]

Leadership: Rudy Giuliani makes it clear that if he and Hillary Clinton are the nominees in 2008, she will have to answer why co-president Bill didn't treat the 1993 WTC bombing as al-Qaida's Pearl Harbor.

Let me make it clear: You won't be the nominee so you had better ask her now.

[George W. Bush]

Leadership: Rudy Giuliani makes it clear that if he and Hillary Clinton are the nominees in 2008, she will have to answer why co-president Bill didn't treat the 1993 WTC bombing as al-Qaida's Pearl Harbor.

Actually, it appears that Xlinton took it more seriously than Giuliani himself.

The Wife Of Clinton would mop the floor with him on this. That's why she's so eager to run against him as the GOP nominee.