Posted on 06/27/2007 4:44:33 PM PDT by Kaslin
VIRGINIA BEACH, Va. (AP) - Republican presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani on Tuesday accused former President Clinton of not responding forcefully enough to the 1993 World Trade Center bombing or later terrorist attacks.
The former New York mayor criticized Democrats, accusing them of weakness and naivete in dealing with terrorism. Giuliani made the comments to about 650 business, corporate and political leaders at Regent University, the conservative Christian college founded by religious broadcaster Pat Robertson.
"Islamic terrorists killed more than 500 Americans before Sept. 11. Many people think the first attack on America was on Sept. 11, 2001. It was not. It was in 1993," said the former New York mayor.
Giuliani argued that Clinton treated the World Trade Center bombing as a criminal act instead of a terrorist attack, calling it "a big mistake" that emboldened other strikes on the Khobar Towers housing complex in Saudi Arabia, in Kenya and Tanzania and later on the USS Cole while docked in Yemen in 2000.
"The United States government, then President Clinton, did not respond," Giuliani said. "(Osama) bin Laden declared war on us. We didn't hear it."
In hindsight, Giuliani said, maybe it's all clearer now, "but now is now, and there is no reason to go back into denial, and that is essentially what the Democratic candidates for president want to do: they want to go back, to put the country in reverse to the 1990s.
"I'm not blaming anybody back then," Giuliani said later in the day at a campaign stop at a Jewish temple in Rockville, Md. "What I am saying is, I do blame people after Sept. 11. Now you have to get it."
Last September, Giuliani defended Clinton's record amid political bickering over which president - Clinton or George W. Bush - missed more opportunities to prevent the Sept. 11 attacks.
"The idea of trying to cast blame on President Clinton is just wrong for many, many reasons, not the least of which is I don't think he deserves it," Giuliani said during a stop in Florida. "I don't think President Bush deserves it. The people who deserve blame for Sept. 11, I think we should remind ourselves, are the terrorists - the Islamic fanatics - who came here and killed us and want to come here again and do it."
In his comments Tuesday, Giuliani said Democrats would abandon Iraq while giving terrorists the U.S. "timetable for retreat."
Giuliani remained aligned with President Bush in keeping U.S. forces in Iraq even as two more senior Senate Republicans - Indiana's Richard Lugar and Ohio's George Voinovich - in the past two days suggested the president's policy is failing and said he should begin bringing troops home.
In his Rockville appearance, Giuliani compared the war in Iraq to the conflict between Hamas and Israel.
"What happened in Gaza is a microcosm of what's going to happen in Baghdad" if the United States withdraws. "It will become something that inflames the entire region."
Democrats were quick to criticize Giuliani.
"Rudy's arrogance has gotten the best of him," the Democratic National Committee said in a one-paragraph response. "How can a man who failed to prepare New York City for a second attack after the first one, who sent firefighters and emergency workers into Ground Zero without respirators and quit the Iraq Study Group to raise money keep America safe?"
Speaking at Regent, Giuliani avoided any mention of two issues that put him at odds with conservatives - his support for gay rights and abortion rights.
But he acknowledged the differences indirectly, drawing warm applause from the conservative audience for doing so.
"Don't expect to agree with me on everything because that would be unrealistic. I don't even agree with me on everything," he said.
Giuliani acknowledged there is little difference between his position and the positions of those of other Republican candidates on terrorism and the Middle East, but said his experience as mayor of New York has prepared him to be better at handling presidential responsibilities.
I bet Mrs Bill Clinton knows what really happened to TWA-800.
OMG. I’m agreeing with the Dim response here.
Way to go, Rudy.
"Most of [President] Clinton's policies are very similar to most of mine"
--Rudolph Giuliani, New York Post, Jun 8, 1999 (restating RWG quote from 1996 )''I don't think tonight's result is tragic, I guess because I'm not that partisan a person ... I think President Clinton is a good man, he's a very decent man, and the country has run pretty well.''--Rudolph Giuliani, commenting on Bob Dole's loss in the 1996 presidential election. New York Times, Nov 7, 1996
Pot...kettle black.
Hunter/Gingrich ‘08
“Way to go, Rudy.”
Hear, hear!
Stick it to ‘em, Rudy!
Huh? Was that from managing the NY City Dept of Defense? Establishing NY City energy policy? Acting as CIC over Bernie Kerik and his mob buddies? Your great immigration policy of sanctuary cities? What an idiot.
Guiliani is just shameless. First he says he doesn't blame Slick,,,and now he does blame Slick? Which is it, Rudy?
wow - why such venom? Is his statement about Clinton wrong? Did you personally experience what Rudy did for NY? I did. he may not be my choice as a candidate, but I am not about to take that away from him.
Because he's an opportunistic hypocrite, for one. He criticizes Clinton while ignoring the things that HE should have done as a result of the first WTC attack, the Empire State Building incident, etc. The guy is a phony authoritarian power-mongering poser. And a liberal, to boot!
Also, Rudy has stated that "Clinton did all that he could do in the WOT". (paraphrsaing) So why would anyone think Rudy would have done anything different (using Rudy's very own words)?
Rudy's 'anti-gun' attitude is another big plus in the WOT. /s
Good for Rudy..........I cannot believe how Bush has not said one word about the failed Clinton administration.
Spill it all Rudy, but watch your back and stay away from Marci Park.
Conservative? Hardly! Set social issues aside. The man stomps all over the Constitution, daily! His "tax cuts" in NY were to the select few interests, while extending the income tax surplus (that had been set to expire) thereby continuing to provide revenue at close to the same level. He borrowed his way through his adminstration and he joined with Clinton and Janet Reno in calling for National Gun licensing.
Rudy might give me 20% of the things I find important. That ain't enough. There are other candidates that can do just as well on the WOT and on being tough. We don't need an authoritarian Giuliani and his corrupt, perverted cronies anywhere near the White House!
Giuliani/McCain electable? Not IMO. Nominate either one and the GOP will be sure to lose. The same goes for Newt, for other reasons.
20% is not a majority of issues. Rudy is left of many, many democrats. That makes him liberal in my book.
As to pinging others, they happen to be collectors of a vast number of facts that might help educate those, like yourself, who obviously have not delved deeply into the subject of Rudy. For example, I know of at least two excellent collections that Ellery has been keeping 1) on the questionable characters that Rudy appoints to high offices (e.g. crooks) and 2) a long list of abuses of the U.S. Constitution.
Does that help?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.