Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A new enemy patrolling our east coast?
The American Thinker ^ | 6/25/2007 | A.M. Mora y León

Posted on 06/26/2007 5:39:45 AM PDT by cll

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: cll
Umm, whats Chavez gonna do with his toys?

They’re right. The USN has other issues right now and can’t spend all its time interdicting Venezuela’s sub fleet. But, if his subs launch a torpedo or missile at friendly ship or drop a mine near a friendly port, we will find out about it and then it is all over for his subs, him and for Venezuela.

Meanwhile it costs a substantial sum of money to keep the his sub fleet maintained, and even more to keep it at sea. The only plus for him is that keeping his subs at sea works up his crews.

Like it or not Chavez and Venezuela have a right to purchase or build such weaponry as they deem necessary for their own defense. If I were Hugo, I'd be working more building infrastructure and promoting industry, so I could build it at home rather than in the USSR, er, Russia. But that's me.

41 posted on 06/26/2007 12:18:58 PM PDT by Little Ray (Rudy Guiliani: If his wives can't trust him, why should we?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paddles
He wouldn't dare. China owns the Panama Canal.

Actually, they lease it. And they don't have any control over the Caribbean approaches to it. I'm not even sure the Chinese would be all that upset about destabilizing the western hemisphere, if they could get a patsy like Hugo to take all the risks.

As for buying submarines...let the jerk buy all he can afford. Each one is a Navy Cross waiting to happen for some deserving USN skipper.

Yeah, they wouldn't stand a chance in a stand up fight, but that's not why ya buy subs.

I'm thinking more in the nature of nation-sponsored terrorism. A single strike against a freighter in the gulf would close down shipping traffic for a month, maybe. And by the time the Navy was on scene, the sub could be sitting back in port in Caracas or Maracaibo, looking innocent. Until the next mission.

The effect on the economy of the hemisphere would be devastating, and it would require a full wartime response.

And don't be too quick to hand out the Navy Crosses to the commanding officers... it could also mean posthumous purple hearts for entire crews of smaller craft like destroyers. And as an ex-sonarman (USN '66-'70), finding and killing a sub is far from a sure thing.

I mean, it would be swell to blow one up, but let's not let our bravado overcome our common sense, or ya might get to visit Davey Jones' Locker.

42 posted on 06/26/2007 12:25:11 PM PDT by Kenton (All vices in moderation. I don't want to overdo any but I don't want to skip any either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

I would find a war between France and Venezuela highly amusing entertainment.


43 posted on 06/26/2007 12:30:30 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: skepsel

Ah, Victory Games!


44 posted on 06/26/2007 12:43:10 PM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: razorback-bert

Chavez thought he needed Bobbleheads vs Bubbleheads !

He has a surplus of those !


45 posted on 06/26/2007 2:24:12 PM PDT by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Sir Hailstone; wideawake
You’re assuming the French have something the British do ... cojones. Come on get real. The French battle flag is a white cloth tied to a stick for crying out loud...

Actually I have to disagree. IMO the French have more b@lls than the (current lot of) Brits do. Goodness, not only have the Brits been cutting defense spending like wars and aggression were a thing of the past, but the term 'Euro-weenie' is starting to shift more and more to them. Which nation BTW stood by and let their sailors get bl@@dy abducted by the Iranians (with reports stating that one of the soldiers was even crying when his IPod was taken away)? Those sailors were taken with no resistance whatsoever (and it was shown by the Aussies just how easy it was to fend the Iranians off). As for the French - they have been anti-American over the last several decades, but that doesn't necessarily make them weak. And when the need arises they can do things that the Brits could never think of doing (e.g. when the French sunk a Greenpeace ship)

Anyways, the Brits are far closer allies than the French are (although with Blair going out in the UK, and Sarkozy coming in in France .....who knows), but the whole adage that the French flag equals surrender while the British one is a bastion of fortitude is starting to look a bit frayed on the sides. Substitute British Flag with Aussie flag and i will agree. For now the UK is one of the most PC places on the globe by far.

As as for Chavez taking martinique ....that would be a major mistake. The French may be anti-American frog-eating cheese-loving folk, but they simply have too many ways of making someone like Chavez suffer.

46 posted on 06/26/2007 9:27:40 PM PDT by spetznaz (Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: cll
Politically part of the United States.

Culturally part of Latin America.

BTW: Good article.

47 posted on 06/26/2007 9:30:38 PM PDT by Clemenza (Rudy Giuliani, like Pesto and Seattle, belongs in the scrap heap of '90s Culture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chilepepper

“but they are US citizens and have honorably and ably served in the US Armed Forces since 1898”

Thank you for noting that.


48 posted on 06/27/2007 5:09:36 PM PDT by cll (Carthage must be destroyed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Roccus

They have my faith and confidence too - but the latest generation of non-nuclear subs are very, very quiet. We have been training against one we leased from Germany(?) for a while now, but I don’t like over confidence.


49 posted on 07/02/2007 3:00:08 PM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson