Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LEDs Move Into Home Lighting Market
Associated Press via Yahoo! News ^ | 2007 Jun 24 | Mark Jewell

Posted on 06/25/2007 3:08:11 AM PDT by Wiz

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: blam

“I wanted a Vegas cocktail lounge look, with a Jetsons flavor to it,”

I’m suspicious of a 32 year old single male living in a loft.

Wonder why.


21 posted on 06/25/2007 4:48:19 AM PDT by Covenantor (America's Fifth column is in the White House and Capitol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Wiz

Bump and Bookmark


22 posted on 06/25/2007 4:49:07 AM PDT by AmericaUnite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wiz

Interesting thread. I became a LED enthusiast after buying a Zipka LED headlamp for backcountry skiing. Headlamps typically lasted about 10 hours before the batteries failed. I showed up with my Zipka and ended up leading my friends to the cabin after all of their headlamps had failed.


23 posted on 06/25/2007 4:55:12 AM PDT by Nephi (Open borders is the flip side of the free trade coin. It's time for Protectionism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Covenantor
I’m suspicious of a 32 year old single male living in a loft.

It beats certain alternatives ... such as living with his parents.

24 posted on 06/25/2007 4:58:36 AM PDT by Lil'freeper (You do not have the plug-in required to view this tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: JackOfVA
You aren't missing anything here, as of today, LED's do provide less light, and are useful only if focused. I experimented with replacing a halogen light source with focused LED's in a very small Kaleidoscope projector I designed. The LED's were up to the job as focused, reflected light, but were not up to the job of driving a diffuser for back lighting.
25 posted on 06/25/2007 5:01:49 AM PDT by Tom Bombadil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk

excellent post! I am bookmarking it to read at work


26 posted on 06/25/2007 5:05:40 AM PDT by Puddleglum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Nephi

I always carry my Surefire LED flashlight on my person, everywhere all the time, it uses one 3 volt battery on average every two or three months and I use this flashlight for inspection work on a daily basis. I had coworkers many years ago using Minimags, the bulbs would oxidized after about 20 hours and of course they sucked AA batteries real quick and here in Alaska at minus zero temps the batteries also failed unlike the Lithium 123 my Surefire uses.


27 posted on 06/25/2007 5:05:44 AM PDT by Eye of Unk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Puddleglum

Even though I have not been an active member in some time years ago I was regarded as a pioneer in LED flashlights of a sort and I hung out at this place:http://www.candlepowerforums.com/

There is a ton of useful information plus a lot of people there make LED lights like custom HID flashlights, high powered LED flashlights and unique items not known on the consumer market.


28 posted on 06/25/2007 5:11:13 AM PDT by Eye of Unk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: AlexW

Fascinating. I wonder what the downside issues are, if any.


29 posted on 06/25/2007 5:20:53 AM PDT by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Wiz
We need a law mandating that all CFBs be replaced with these. NOW!!!!
30 posted on 06/25/2007 5:23:52 AM PDT by Tribune7 (A bleeding heart does nothing but ruin the carpet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wiz

Everlasting light
Jun 19th 2007
From Economist.com

An environmentally friendly bulb that may never need changing

DESPITE its use to symbolise a bright idea, the traditional incandescent lightbulb is a dud. It wastes electricity, radiating 95% of the energy it consumes as heat rather than light. Its life is also relatively short, culminating in a dull pop as its filament fractures. Now a team of researchers has devised a lightbulb that is not only much more energy efficient. It also lasts, in effect, forever—that is, it is expected to last longer than the devices into which it is inserted. Moreover the lamp could be used for rear-projection televisions as well as general illumination.

The trick to a longer life, for lightbulbs at least, is to ensure that the lamp has no electrodes. Although electrodes are undeniably convenient for plugging bulbs directly into the lighting system, they are also the main reason why lamps fail. The electrodes wear out. They can react chemically with the gas inside the lightbulb, making it grow dimmer. They are also difficult to seal into the structure of the bulb, making the rupture of these seals another potential source of failure.

Scientists working for Ceravision, a company based in Milton Keynes, in Britain, have designed a lamp that eliminates the need for electrodes. Their device uses microwaves to transform electricity into light. It consists of a relatively small lump of aluminium oxide into which a hole has been bored. When the aluminium oxide is bombarded with microwaves generated from the same sort of device that powers a microwave oven, it generates a concentrated electric field in the void.

If a cylindrical capsule containing a suitable gas is inserted into the hole, the atoms of the gas become ionised. As electrons accelerate in the electric field, they gain energy that they pass on to the atoms and molecules of the gas as they collide with them, creating a glowing plasma. The light is bright, and the process is energy efficient. Indeed, while traditional lightbulbs emit just 5% of their power as light, and fluorescent tubes about 15%, the Ceravision lamp has an efficiency greater than 50%.

Because the lamp has no filament, the scientists who developed it think it will last for thousands of hours of use—in other words, decades. Moreover the light it generates comes from what is almost a single point, which means that the bulbs can be used in projectors and televisions. Because of this, the light is much more directional and the lamp could thus prove more efficient than bulbs that scatter light in all directions. Its long life would make the new light ideal for places where the architecture makes changing lightbulbs a complicated and expensive job. Its small size makes it comparable to light-emitting diodes but the new lamp generates much brighter light than do those semiconductor devices.

Another environmental advantage of the system is that it does not have to use mercury. The metal is highly toxic and is found in most of the bulbs used today, including the energy-saving bulb, fluorescent tubes and the high-pressure bulbs used in projectors. Its developers reckon it should be cheap to make.

With lighting accounting for some 20% of electricity use worldwide, switching to a more efficient system could save not only energy but also on emissions of carbon. Now that would be a bright idea.

http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9356447&CFID=6374450&CFTOKEN=53124613


31 posted on 06/25/2007 5:40:19 AM PDT by saganite (Billions and billions and billions----and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk
You will not for the most part find a LED type of lamp with an output near a conventional bulb in Walmart, but they have been available for many years.

That is what irks me also. I can order some great stuff from C Crane...but not go and get the same from Lowes or Home Depot. They do have some of the lesser LED stuff, but not really what is best for general home lighting. I did try their 'party' nightlight though. From the street at night, it looks like someone is home watching television. :)
32 posted on 06/25/2007 6:07:27 AM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JackOfVA

cree.com implies the leds are more efficient and are getting to higher output for less energy.


33 posted on 06/25/2007 6:29:25 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: blam
"I’m suspicious of a 32 year old single male living in a loft."

Do you have a 22-27 year old daughter? :-)

34 posted on 06/25/2007 9:05:06 AM PDT by gura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Wiz

I don’t like the LEDs I have seen so far. Something about the quality of the light is harsh on the reading.


35 posted on 06/25/2007 9:07:12 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Treaty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Covenantor
“I wanted a Vegas cocktail lounge look, with a Jetsons flavor to it,”

Say what you want but he's no metrosexual.

36 posted on 06/25/2007 9:09:14 AM PDT by Tribune7 (A bleeding heart does nothing but ruin the carpet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk

There are also experiments using LED for wireless data transmission, including traffic light LEDs. It’s range is not long , but can transmit broadband quality data (currently 10MBPS). Implemented into traffic systems, it could tell how long the light will be green, yellow, red, assist blind people, and even provide traffic information ahead. LEDs are pretty cool for its fast blinking rate. However, I also learned not long ago about a more effecient source for room light, which is solid state laser. It is assumed that it has an infinite life span, and there is no need to replace it once installed. However, laser has different characteristics from beam, which sprays, and there is a need to scatter the solid state laser (white color) to spray the light into multiple directions. It must also be eye safe. LEDs too, also are dangerous to look at for a long time (well, not many people woud do so).


37 posted on 06/25/2007 9:55:11 AM PDT by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: gura
"Do you have a 22-27 year old daughter? :-)"

No, I have a 38 year old son, Dr blam.

38 posted on 06/25/2007 9:55:16 AM PDT by blam (Secure the border then, Introduce an Illegal Immigrant Deportation Bill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird

I like that way of bumping for later, I might steal it.

B4L8r


39 posted on 06/25/2007 12:37:14 PM PDT by Kevmo (We need to get away from the Kennedy Wing of the Republican Party ~Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
Have at it.

Keep in mind that it's OpenSource, and released under the GPL. :-)

40 posted on 06/25/2007 12:49:32 PM PDT by AFreeBird (Will NOT vote for Rudy. <--- notice the period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson