Posted on 06/25/2007 3:08:11 AM PDT by Wiz
“I wanted a Vegas cocktail lounge look, with a Jetsons flavor to it,”
Im suspicious of a 32 year old single male living in a loft.
Wonder why.
Bump and Bookmark
Interesting thread. I became a LED enthusiast after buying a Zipka LED headlamp for backcountry skiing. Headlamps typically lasted about 10 hours before the batteries failed. I showed up with my Zipka and ended up leading my friends to the cabin after all of their headlamps had failed.
It beats certain alternatives ... such as living with his parents.
excellent post! I am bookmarking it to read at work
I always carry my Surefire LED flashlight on my person, everywhere all the time, it uses one 3 volt battery on average every two or three months and I use this flashlight for inspection work on a daily basis. I had coworkers many years ago using Minimags, the bulbs would oxidized after about 20 hours and of course they sucked AA batteries real quick and here in Alaska at minus zero temps the batteries also failed unlike the Lithium 123 my Surefire uses.
Even though I have not been an active member in some time years ago I was regarded as a pioneer in LED flashlights of a sort and I hung out at this place:http://www.candlepowerforums.com/
There is a ton of useful information plus a lot of people there make LED lights like custom HID flashlights, high powered LED flashlights and unique items not known on the consumer market.
Fascinating. I wonder what the downside issues are, if any.
Everlasting light
Jun 19th 2007
From Economist.com
An environmentally friendly bulb that may never need changing
DESPITE its use to symbolise a bright idea, the traditional incandescent lightbulb is a dud. It wastes electricity, radiating 95% of the energy it consumes as heat rather than light. Its life is also relatively short, culminating in a dull pop as its filament fractures. Now a team of researchers has devised a lightbulb that is not only much more energy efficient. It also lasts, in effect, foreverthat is, it is expected to last longer than the devices into which it is inserted. Moreover the lamp could be used for rear-projection televisions as well as general illumination.
The trick to a longer life, for lightbulbs at least, is to ensure that the lamp has no electrodes. Although electrodes are undeniably convenient for plugging bulbs directly into the lighting system, they are also the main reason why lamps fail. The electrodes wear out. They can react chemically with the gas inside the lightbulb, making it grow dimmer. They are also difficult to seal into the structure of the bulb, making the rupture of these seals another potential source of failure.
Scientists working for Ceravision, a company based in Milton Keynes, in Britain, have designed a lamp that eliminates the need for electrodes. Their device uses microwaves to transform electricity into light. It consists of a relatively small lump of aluminium oxide into which a hole has been bored. When the aluminium oxide is bombarded with microwaves generated from the same sort of device that powers a microwave oven, it generates a concentrated electric field in the void.
If a cylindrical capsule containing a suitable gas is inserted into the hole, the atoms of the gas become ionised. As electrons accelerate in the electric field, they gain energy that they pass on to the atoms and molecules of the gas as they collide with them, creating a glowing plasma. The light is bright, and the process is energy efficient. Indeed, while traditional lightbulbs emit just 5% of their power as light, and fluorescent tubes about 15%, the Ceravision lamp has an efficiency greater than 50%.
Because the lamp has no filament, the scientists who developed it think it will last for thousands of hours of usein other words, decades. Moreover the light it generates comes from what is almost a single point, which means that the bulbs can be used in projectors and televisions. Because of this, the light is much more directional and the lamp could thus prove more efficient than bulbs that scatter light in all directions. Its long life would make the new light ideal for places where the architecture makes changing lightbulbs a complicated and expensive job. Its small size makes it comparable to light-emitting diodes but the new lamp generates much brighter light than do those semiconductor devices.
Another environmental advantage of the system is that it does not have to use mercury. The metal is highly toxic and is found in most of the bulbs used today, including the energy-saving bulb, fluorescent tubes and the high-pressure bulbs used in projectors. Its developers reckon it should be cheap to make.
With lighting accounting for some 20% of electricity use worldwide, switching to a more efficient system could save not only energy but also on emissions of carbon. Now that would be a bright idea.
http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9356447&CFID=6374450&CFTOKEN=53124613
cree.com implies the leds are more efficient and are getting to higher output for less energy.
Do you have a 22-27 year old daughter? :-)
I don’t like the LEDs I have seen so far. Something about the quality of the light is harsh on the reading.
Say what you want but he's no metrosexual.
There are also experiments using LED for wireless data transmission, including traffic light LEDs. It’s range is not long , but can transmit broadband quality data (currently 10MBPS). Implemented into traffic systems, it could tell how long the light will be green, yellow, red, assist blind people, and even provide traffic information ahead. LEDs are pretty cool for its fast blinking rate. However, I also learned not long ago about a more effecient source for room light, which is solid state laser. It is assumed that it has an infinite life span, and there is no need to replace it once installed. However, laser has different characteristics from beam, which sprays, and there is a need to scatter the solid state laser (white color) to spray the light into multiple directions. It must also be eye safe. LEDs too, also are dangerous to look at for a long time (well, not many people woud do so).
No, I have a 38 year old son, Dr blam.
I like that way of bumping for later, I might steal it.
B4L8r
Keep in mind that it's OpenSource, and released under the GPL. :-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.