Feinstein - Get Real, Then you Can be a Part of Talk Readio

06/2407 | Francis

[Francis]

This ridicules interview with Feinstein and Lott is exactly why Democratic talk radio will get no where. People know when representatives are lying and obfuscating issues.

Diane Feinstein’s prefab talk to filter everything into a Democratic talking point during this Wallace interview is aggravating, off-point, and arrogant. She thinks the masses do not understand the issues or read the bills. She’s wrong! That’s where arrogance can lead to demise.

Diane Feinstein is a perfect example. Here she talks so high and mighty about the law and Dick Cheney. I wonder how she can talk about the law when she has been sitting on the Military Appropriations Committee while she handed contract after contract to her husband’s businesses including URS and Perini which benefits she and her husband immeasurably.

I have never understood people who can never have enough money, wealth or fiefdoms. She’s one and she is so transparent. Answer the questions, Diane Feinstein, if you believe in the law. Do you think there was a conflict of interest in the military procurements that you authorized? Do you think you should have stepped down, rather than head up the Committee yourself? Do you think it is right that you and your husband benefited from the Iraq War and now you talk as though the Iraq War was something you were not a part of or did not authorized. You were an interested part in the Iraq War, you benefited financially in ways most American’s have no concept.

Get real – start talking facts, and then you can be a part of talk radio.

[dusttoyou]

Did anyone catch the “searsucker suit” thingy with Lott and Di-Fi on Fox News Sunday this morning?

Its more like Di-Fi “see a sucker” and its Lott trying to kiss up.

Had our whole house hollerin at the TV this morning!!!!

[El Gran Salseron]

Did it ever dawn upon these numbskulls that the people are SUPPOSED to be telling them what to do, not vice-versa.

[Francis]

Exactly! They are not repesenting the U.S. citizens in their district. I think term limits is the only answer.

Representatives should be representatives; not corrupt globalist politicians, running around the world gaining power and influence with corporations and other nations for the betterment of their own personal financial well being.

They should represent the interests of the U.S. citizens in their state. They should be prohibited from accepting campaign money and donations from foreign governments and foreign corporations. (That's campaign finance reform!) AND A two-term limit for the house, and a one term limit for the Senate sounds good to me. What do you think?

[El Gran Salseron]

I agree. Term limits are the answer even though it might get some honest men out of office. I can just about guarantee you that it would get rid of a lot more dead wood and those who are looking to line their pockets with our money.