Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/22/2007 7:25:55 PM PDT by bnelson44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: bnelson44

WTF??? We’ve been sending them AID???? In addition to the BILLIONS they get for their oil? Good Lord.


2 posted on 06/22/2007 7:29:29 PM PDT by PeterFinn (Oderint Dum Metuant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

Why on earth would Saudi Arabia need “aid” from us? Are the Bushies aware of the proven money pipeline between the Saudis and Hamas?


3 posted on 06/22/2007 7:30:02 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44
Finally, a SANE act of government. It's not enough we give them trillions of dollars for their oil, we need to give them AID on top of that?

\\\it's about time people wake up in this country, and realize we have been paying the "Jizya" tax required of all infidels for quite some time now.

Whatever happened to the proclamation a much smarter past president made- back in time when he put an end to this "Jizya" payments which were made to the Barbary pirates, and gave them relentless artillary shelling until they capitulated instead?

It's time we returned to being a proud, strong, and FREE nation.

11 posted on 06/22/2007 7:37:55 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

It is imbedded inside a very elaborate appropriations bill.

H.R.2764
The Department of State, Foreign Operations and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2008 (Engrossed as Agreed to or Passed by House)


PROHIBITION AGAINST ASSISTANCE TO SAUDI ARABIA

SEC. 699N. None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available pursuant to this Act—

(1) shall be obligated or expended to finance any assistance to Saudi Arabia; or

(2) shall be used to execute a waiver of section 571 or 614 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2349aa or 2364) with regard to assistance to Saudi Arabia.

SEC. 699O. None of the funds made available in this Act may be used to provide direct aid to the Palestinian Authority, except as otherwise provided by existing law.

This Act may be cited as `The Department of State, Foreign Operations and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2008’.
Passed the House of Representatives June 22 (legislative day, June 21), 2007.

Attest:

Clerk.

110th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. R. 2764

AN ACT
Making appropriations for the Department of State, foreign operations, and related programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2008, and for other purposes.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c110:2:./temp/~c110ku317m::


16 posted on 06/22/2007 7:44:07 PM PDT by bnelson44 (http://www.appealforcourage.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44
Aside from the aid issue I've always wondered why the WTO is not somehow able to prevent OPEC from setting price/pump levels when any other form of subsidies/price supports seems to fall within its jurisdiction. In the US its illegal to collude to set prices ... just wondering ...
;-(
17 posted on 06/22/2007 7:45:03 PM PDT by Tunehead54 (Nothing funny here. ;-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

Burn Washington to the ground, flush the ashes out to sea, and start over.


19 posted on 06/22/2007 7:53:00 PM PDT by claudiustg (I didn't leave the Republican Party. I was purged.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

probably paying them off for not sending more terrs to fly passenger planes. we will probably pay more when they raise
the price of oil.


21 posted on 06/22/2007 7:58:55 PM PDT by alfie (peace through superior firepower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

Perks for our Masters.


23 posted on 06/22/2007 8:01:45 PM PDT by gotribe ("Truly, America is my favorite slave." - King Fahd Bin Abdul-Aziz, Jeddeh 1993)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44
WE GAVE AT THE PUMP!
31 posted on 06/22/2007 8:22:46 PM PDT by BoneShaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

Huh? What the heck do they need aid for? Unless were are sending “aid” to “moderate groups” within Saudi Arabia.

Let’s cut off Jordan, Egypt and the so-called Palestinians while we are at it.

Ungrateful bunch of neandrathals.


37 posted on 06/22/2007 8:28:23 PM PDT by Fledermaus (Bush turned into a squishy liberal. He's worse than his daddy. Quit and let Cheney handle things!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44
In the past three years, Congress has passed bills to stop the relatively small amount of U.S. aid to Saudi Arabia, only to see the Bush administration circumvent the prohibitions.

I hadn't heard about this. Another example of Dubya unConstitutionally treating the Congress as merely advisory, like the Roman Senate?

51 posted on 06/22/2007 8:55:06 PM PDT by ellery (I don't remember a constitutional amendment that gives you the right not to be identified-R.Giuliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

Aid or bribe money? Obviously the rich kings and princes of SA don’t need our financial aid. So I figure it must have been bribe money to allow us to post troops on their soil.

According to the article, most if not all troops are now gone from SA. So yea, it’s time to end paying them rent for us to be there.

The bigger question is why is the US training saudis in our skills of war? So they can use them against us in the future? To fight terrorism? Yea right. How bout some swampland in Florida? They hate us alright, but not more than they love our money.


53 posted on 06/22/2007 9:00:44 PM PDT by takenoprisoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

OMG!!!
We’ve been supporting people who are supporting murderous terrorists? Is Bush going to veto the bill? I won’t be surprised if he does.


55 posted on 06/22/2007 9:05:06 PM PDT by nycgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44
According to supporters of the legislation, the United States provided $2.5 million to Riyadh in 2005 and 2006. The money has been used to train Saudis in counter-terrorism and border security and to pay for Saudi military officers to attend U.S. military school.

Pure grandstanding by the House. This isn't aid. I might add that the Saudis have been paying for everything they get from us, including all of the costs of our training mission to the Kingdom.

63 posted on 06/22/2007 9:28:25 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

*this in place of some very colorful language*


64 posted on 06/22/2007 9:31:53 PM PDT by wastedyears (Check my profile for links to anti-illegal immigration T-shirts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

Nonsensical move.


70 posted on 06/22/2007 10:35:04 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44; All

Worthless Reuters -DNC propaganda


71 posted on 06/22/2007 10:38:53 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44
Me? Personally! I'd rather see this headline "US NUKES MECCA" when talking about Saudi Arabia. Anything less in dealing with Riyadh is nothing more than the posturing of puppets and a waste of time in my humble opinion.
73 posted on 06/23/2007 6:47:28 AM PDT by EndWelfareToday (Live free and keep what you earn. - Tancredo or Hunter '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

ROTFALMAO. Saudi Arabia is populated by billionaire princes. No matter how much we gave them they would hardly notice it in their bank account.

This is how the U. S. State Department works.


74 posted on 06/23/2007 7:46:12 AM PDT by R.W.Ratikal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

We’ve actually been giving them military type aid so the monarchy doesn’t fall. There is a widespread insurgency in Saudi Arabia that has major ties with al queda. If they overthrew the royal family we’d be in a worse situation. I guess we’ve chosen the lesser of two evils.


75 posted on 06/23/2007 8:22:13 AM PDT by rfreedom4u (My Freedom of speech trumps your feelings!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson