Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Corker Says "More Modest" Immigration Bill Needed
The Chattanoogan.com ^ | 6/22/2007 | Unlisted

Posted on 06/22/2007 7:54:27 AM PDT by tennmountainman

Anticipating a cloture vote on the immigration bill on Tuesday, U.S. Senator Bob Corker (R-TN) today said he will be in opposition.

He said, “I plan to vote against cloture on the immigration bill, as I have already done twice during this debate. I believe a better approach would be a more modest bill that focuses on border security, employer identification, and putting systems in place that will put us in a position to actually enforce a new immigration policy.

Sen. Lamar Alexander said he will also vote against cloture.

(Excerpt) Read more at chattanoogan.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alexander; aliens; amnesty; bobcorker; coker; corker; illegalimmigration; immigrantlist; immigration; lamar; lamaralexander; noamnestyforillegals; vampirebill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
The key sentence in this article is "Sen. Lamar Alexander said he will also vote against cloture."

It's about time Mr. Alexander got the message.

1 posted on 06/22/2007 7:54:27 AM PDT by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

I was giving up hope on Lamar and Corker...this is excellent news.

I’ll make a THANK YOU call to their offices..


2 posted on 06/22/2007 7:57:46 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet -Fred'08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman
It's about time Mr. Alexander got the message.

I suppose Lamar! took a break from trying to figure out a way to ram an internet tax through and from proposing legislation banning windmills to look at the immigration problem. All he really needed to do is look out the window. Can't swing a dead cat here in SE Tennessee without hitting an illegal.....then again, if you aren't careful one might just hit you.

3 posted on 06/22/2007 7:57:59 AM PDT by Thermalseeker (Just the facts ma'am)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

The light finally dawns on the man from plaid.


4 posted on 06/22/2007 7:59:52 AM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

I guess “modest” is the appropriate word given that the Amnestyville Horror amounts to naked aggression against the American people.

Its all nice and fine when legislators actually listen to their constituents, but the fact is, they never should have supported this monstrosity to begin with....we shouldn’t have had to yell at them to get them to do the right thing.....that is what is really frustrating about all this..


5 posted on 06/22/2007 8:00:55 AM PDT by HerrBlucher (Tack it up and shut em down Fred!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman
Bush again displays how stubborn he actually is.
To try to garner votes against the will and wishes of his own party's majority is a rather strong piece of hallucination.m
6 posted on 06/22/2007 8:01:26 AM PDT by hermgem (The same)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

Truly excellent!


7 posted on 06/22/2007 8:01:36 AM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

Looks like Kay’s ‘no’ announcement yesterday was all the prodding the other ‘fence-sitting’ senators needed. I would suspect also that a 14% congressional approval in the latest Gallup poll could help them make up their minds too!


8 posted on 06/22/2007 8:02:01 AM PDT by katieanna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: Thermalseeker

Good for Lamar! Alexander. I hope he’s learned how much this means to the people he’ll have to rely on for reelection, but I think Lamar! still needs careful scrutiny and plenty of letters.


10 posted on 06/22/2007 8:03:16 AM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

Two down, and by my count, about 13 more to go to stop cloture. There will be two big votes: the cloture vote, in which 60 votes are needed to invoke cloture and bring the bill to the floor, and the final vote approving the bill, which only requires a simple majority of 50 votes for it to pass. These people need to be leaned on to vote against cloture, first and foremost, because their “no” vote will count for less when only a majority is needed to pass the bill. I believe the Dems have the votes to pass the bill on the final vote. DEMAND THAT THEY VOTE AGAINST CLOTURE.


11 posted on 06/22/2007 8:03:52 AM PDT by 3AngelaD (They screwed up their own countries so bad they had to leave, and now they're here screwing up ours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman
This part was perfectly stated:

We must secure the border first once and for all, verified by credible sources, without amnesty, you are here legally or you are not here.

But then it was somewhat soured by this line:

We also must make it easier for highly skilled workers to come to America

No, we need to put Americans in America before all others, and we need to shatter and discard for good this paradigm of letting strangers gorge on us. We train Americans for those jobs, and let foreigners develop their own damned industries themselves.

But I was so satisfied to read the first quote, that I will pretend the second quote wasn't there, for now.
12 posted on 06/22/2007 8:04:56 AM PDT by starbase (Understanding Written Propaganda (click "starbase" to learn 22 manipulating tricks!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

Here’s Bill OReilly’s ‘simple plan’

1) secure the southern border with 700, not 300 miles of barrier, double the border patrol and back them up with 10,000 National Guards people. That would effectively shut down human and drug smuggling from Mexico.

2) require all illegal aliens in the country right now to register at the post office with Homeland Security. After registering, they would be given a tamper proof ID card, designating their status and their right to work temporarily in the USA. If the illegal aliens do not register, it’s a criminal felony. Right now sneaking across the border is a civil action. Remember that. Subjecting the person to immediate deportation or jail time. The criminal penalty goes way up.
3) Any business that hires an illegal worker who doesn’t have a tamper proof ID card faces draconian fines and possible prison time for the executives.
4) Each illegal alien would have his case reviewed by federal authorities. And they would decide who would receive a Z-visa to stay and who would not. That takes the blanket amnesty, something many American hate, off the table. It also allows the feds to make rational decisions about who’s helping America and who isn’t.

Under that banner, no illegal alien who commits a crime while here would be allowed to stay. Also under that program, no welfare of any kind would be paid to folks here illegally. They’d have to work for their living.

Now that is a fair immigration plan that I believe would be acceptable to most Americans. It would also allow the feds to quickly build a database, so Homeland Security would know the extent of the alien intrusion, which we don’t know now.

Again, any illegal alien who didn’t cooperate with the new law would immediately become an outlaw. And immediate action could be taken against that non-citizen who doesn’t comply. That would end the sanctuary city madness and give the federal government more tools to regain control over this out of control situation.

So there you have it — a fair plan to give good people a chance to stay here and earn cit


13 posted on 06/22/2007 8:05:12 AM PDT by griswold3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

ping a ling!


14 posted on 06/22/2007 8:05:35 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks (BUILD THE WALL, ENFORCE THE LAW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hermgem

To try to garner votes against the will and wishes of his own party’s majority is a rather strong piece of hallucination.
:::::
His fanatic pursuit of this atrocity against the American people is profoundly shocking. I truly question his suitability to be President for this, and other reasons. A President must work hard FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, and not the people of another country at major cost and impact to his own country. I seriously doubt all of his staff is in agreement with an outright afront to the American people, and especially those that installed him in the Oval Office for two terms....


15 posted on 06/22/2007 8:05:36 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

UPDATE:

The Senate is done now til Tuesday- no cloture vote til next week. http://corner.nationalreview.com/


16 posted on 06/22/2007 8:05:39 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet -Fred'08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katieanna

I sent her a “thank you” note for that too.


17 posted on 06/22/2007 8:06:31 AM PDT by TheZMan (That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: katieanna

I agree. These senators who went public with their NO vote on clouture could have remained silent and simply voted NO.

By going public with their intention to vote NO, they have started a snowball effect, of which I’m sure Trent Lott and Lindsey Graham are none to happy with.

After all these GOP pro-amnesty bunch will be left holding the stinking bag. Voters in these respective states will remember them come elections.


18 posted on 06/22/2007 8:06:47 AM PDT by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

Their neighbors to the south, Cochran won’t say, and Lott is for it. What’s happened to Mississippi?

Anyway Cochran is running next year, so if he votes yes, look for a retirement or a hard primary.

Vacant Lott is there until 2012. All please TELL your senators you have no faith in the party leadership and you want Lott out the Whip spot or no money!


19 posted on 06/22/2007 8:08:49 AM PDT by Sybeck1 (Amnesty GOP members are betting on a Clinton nomination, to get their support back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheZMan

Thank you’s go a long way too. Even if you’re the only one to do so (which I doubt) it will mean a lot to her. Regards, kate


20 posted on 06/22/2007 8:09:49 AM PDT by katieanna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson