Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DogByte6RER
As much as I love puppies, I don’t know why a guy would go to jail for this. It’s just fine to feed a snake a mouse, a rat, a hamster, even a rabbit, but feed the snake a puppy and you’re going to jail? It’s okay to clip a chicken’s beak when it’s a baby, inject it full of hormones and steroids, etc., and raise it under horrible conditions and then slaughter it and sell its flesh to be eaten, but some yahoos set up a cock fight and they’re going to jail for cruelty to animals. That doesn’t make any sense to me. They’re animals. If you own an animal and you want to kill it, I wouldn’t approve unless it had to be done. I wouldn’t like it and I wouldn’t like you for doing it. But I wouldn’t put you in jail for it, because it’s just and animal and because it’s your property and your business, not mine. Touch my dog and we’d have a big problem, but if you want to feed your puppies to your snake, that’s your business.
30 posted on 06/16/2007 8:50:57 PM PDT by TKDietz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TKDietz
There are some animals that we as a society have deemed worthy of protection. It seems vets and pet stores generally recommend feeding rodents to snakes. This is true just as small fish have to be fed to larger fish. As far as the chickens, we may need or eat them for food, but it is important to keep them healthy and in good living conditions until their deaths. This has to be done to keep nature in balance. However, I would argue that if people were deliberately purchasing mice, hamsters, gerbils, rabbits, and chickens and deliberately absuing or raising them in horrible conditions, they could be accused of animal cruelty. Dogs, cats, ferrets, lions, tigers, cougars, elephants, penguins, seals, sea lions, and more are considered animals worthy of protection. Killing them really serves no purpose, and they certainly are able to show some emotions comparable to those of humans. These would be such things as excitement, anger, sadness, anxiety, and loyalty. We could even argue some dogs appear to demonstrate love. That is up to personal opinion, but I feel at least one of my dogs does. Fighting dogs is definitely cruelty to the dogs. I read a recent article on it and the cruelty to the dogs. They fight until they are near death or too injured to go on. They know no better. Dogs like that are deliberately made aggressive and will be aggressive and a danger to other people.

"The injuries inflicted and sustained by dogs participating in dogfights are frequently severe, even fatal. The American pit bull terriers used in the majority of these fights have been specifically bred and trained for fighting and are unrelenting in their attempts to overcome their opponents. With their extremely powerful jaws, they are able to inflict severe bruising, deep puncture wounds, and broken bones.

Dogs used in these events often die of blood loss, shock, dehydration, exhaustion, or infection hours or even days after the fight. Other animals are often sacrificed as well. Some owners train their dogs for fights using smaller animals such as cats, rabbits, or small dogs. These "bait" animals are often stolen pets or animals obtained through "free to good home" advertisements."

SNIP

"Dogs used for fighting have been bred for many generations to be dangerously aggressive toward other animals. The presence of these dogs in a community increases the risk of attacks not only on other animals but also on people. Children are especially at risk, because their small size may cause a fighting dog to perceive a child as another animal."

http://www.hsus.org/hsus_field/animal_fighting_the_final_round/dogfighting_fact_sheet/

We have duty and power over these animals to treat them well, and it is wrong to abuse it. Animals may be property, but they are not like a computer or a sofa. They are living, breathing, feeling creatures. We certainly don't need to treat them like the Chicoms.

"While those who abuse people also are likely to abuse animals, the reverse is true as well. Research indicates those who abuse animals are far more likely to commit acts of violence against people."

SNIP

"The Latham Foundation cites nine common situations in which this lack of control translates into animal abuse:

To control an animal's behavior. Cruel or excessive punishment is often used in an attempt to modify a pet's behavior, or to eliminate unwanted behaviors. In many cases, correction is administered impulsively rather than as part of any consistent training effort.

To retaliate for perceived wrong. Those who seek retaliation or revenge often believe an animal misbehaved "deliberately" or "out of spite." The perpetrator takes satisfaction in "getting back at" the pet and "making it pay."

To retaliate against another person. An abuser wishes to inflict pain and suffering upon a human victim, and does so by inflicting harm upon a beloved pet. Batters may use threats or retaliation against a pet to control the behavior of a spouse, partner or child.

Out of prejudice against a species or breed. Some perpetrators abuse because the "hate cats" or "hate dogs," or hate a particular breed. In some cases, this is based upon cultural or social biases.

To express aggression through an animal. Some abusers train animals to attack other animals or even humans. In this case, the abuser is literally using an animal as a weapon to inflict harm and vent anger.

To enhance one's own sense of, or experience with, aggressiveness. For some, abusing animals provides a sense of strength and power. For others, it's a way of "training" aggressive skills and, in many cases, "working up to" acts of violence against humans. In gangs or cults, members may be required to demonstrate their commitment and aggression by killing or maiming animals.

To shock, amuse or show off. Some perpetrators enjoy demonstrating their willingness to hurt animals-to demonstrate how "tough' they are or because it amuses them and their friends.

To express displaced hostility. A person who cannot lash out against an abuser may, instead, displace that anger onto a more vulnerable target, such as a pet.

Out of sadism. In some cases, perpetrators commit acts of cruelty simply because they derive pleasure from the pain, suffering or death of the victim."

http://www.geocities.com/hrhangell/article2.html

78 posted on 06/17/2007 2:04:57 AM PDT by Pinkbell (I'm a Christian, a conservative and a Republican, in that order. - Mike Pence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson