Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
And Mohammed would never lie, right ?
To: NormsRevenge
3 posted on
06/14/2007 8:54:44 AM PDT by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(The DemonicRATS believe ....that the best decisions are always made after the fact.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
They are not doing what the world says to do so, leave them alone!
I like Newt’s idea. A single bombing run on the refinery, or submarine cruise missile strike.
If they want to then move arms, nukes, etc around, they can walk them.
4 posted on
06/14/2007 8:55:56 AM PDT by
edcoil
(Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
in.other..news...
Iran..got..busted..trying..to..buy..black..market..enriched...
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
And allowing the mullahs to have nuclear weapons would be a sane policy?
6 posted on
06/14/2007 8:56:07 AM PDT by
denydenydeny
(Expel the priest and you don't inaugurate the age of reason, you get the witch doctor--Paul Johnson)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"an act of madness"
WRONG, Mr. IAEA, the real act of madness is that we continue to allow UN, EU, and IAEA bloatocrats like YOU to run this show. Since it has been obvious for a very long time that you are nothing but a stall tactic for the world to pretend something is being done while Iran continues to move aggressively toward nuclear weapons.
7 posted on
06/14/2007 8:56:31 AM PDT by
Enchante
(Reid and Pelosi Defeatocrats: Surrender Now - Peace for Our Time!!)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Time for the UN to go from passing a resolution to passing a strongly worded resolution. That otta do it!
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
No, we’re not mad. We’re human beings. It’s the way we are.
9 posted on
06/14/2007 8:58:42 AM PDT by
RightWhale
(Repeal the Treaty)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
He’s not from the Religion of Pieces is he?
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Iran will get their butt well and thoroughly kicked, not because they have an illicit and forbidden uranium enrichment program designed exclusively to build nuclear weapons, but because they have done something else, of such egregious and indisputably bad nature, such as funding a war in a neighboring nation, or actually taking part in an assault, that the world has to respond.
And in responding, if the uranium enrichment complex is taken out, well, that would just be ‘collateral damage’.
11 posted on
06/14/2007 9:00:42 AM PDT by
alloysteel
(Choose carefully the hill you would die upon. For if you win, the view is magnificent.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
MoHamHead needs to stuff it.
He has about as much credibility on nuclear proliferation, as Putin does when he goes off about preserving regional stability (as he builds Iranian nuke plants, takes over media outlets, blackmails nations using recently nationalized state energy companies, and sends KGB buddies all over the world to poison people with radioactive substances, because they are writing a book or talking trash)
ElBaradi should NEVER have been allowed to retain his post, he has done everything in his power to make the situation worse, to the point where I don't even think its incompetence. I question whos side he is actually on... no joke.
12 posted on
06/14/2007 9:02:30 AM PDT by
FreedomNeocon
(Success is not final; Failure is not fatal; it is the courage to continue that counts -- Churchill)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
So, why does the UN have a muslim at the head of their nuclear team?
13 posted on
06/14/2007 9:02:44 AM PDT by
aShepard
(Oh little Mohammad, Couchy, Couchy Coo; your momma is so proud, you'll be the cutest suicide bomber)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
He said any use of force to shut down Iran's nuclear programme "would be catastrophic, it would be an act of madness, and it would not solve the issue". It would solve the issue pretty darned quickly.
14 posted on
06/14/2007 9:05:12 AM PDT by
mak5
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
This is the same jackass who helped Saddam shuffle the deck to ensure his programs would never be officially discovered by his flim flam U.N. "inspectors". Zero credibility...except as an enabler of terrorists with nuclear weapons aspirations.
16 posted on
06/14/2007 9:16:05 AM PDT by
Myrddin
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Traderrob sads allowing Iran to obtain a nuclear weapon is “an act of madness”
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"On the other hand the agency is unable to provide the assurance that this is a peaceful programme. They don't listen to much of the rhetoric coming from "Imanutjob" do they.
Peace is the most overused word within the rhetoric of "Imanutjob". /s
18 posted on
06/14/2007 9:25:41 AM PDT by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
time to call for this arab apologists resignation.
19 posted on
06/14/2007 9:26:27 AM PDT by
SCHROLL
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
ElBaradei is incompetent to do the job he is supposed to do, so now he’s going to tell us how to do ours.
22 posted on
06/14/2007 9:28:32 AM PDT by
Moonman62
(The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Continued Mullah shilling from this nuke-enabler.
26 posted on
06/14/2007 9:33:32 AM PDT by
rod1
(uake)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
What is INSANE is that this Arab is still in his job...
Much of the Lunatic world gained Nuclear weapons on his watch, and he says attacking and preventing this is “madness”...
I have a far different definition of madness...
36 posted on
06/14/2007 1:55:32 PM PDT by
river rat
(Semper Fi - You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson