Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Plaintiff tears up testifying of lost pants
Washington Times ^ | 6-13-07 | Andrea Benda

Posted on 06/13/2007 12:31:22 PM PDT by JZelle

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: sticker

It happens when I use a contraction, and then Spell Check. When I used “didn’t” yesterday, Spell Check singled out “didn” and gave me a bunch of possibilities,. None of which included “didn’t.”


41 posted on 06/13/2007 1:17:33 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ("Don't touch that thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: toldyou

Maybe that was the plan,? Who has 65 million? Maybe, he wants to put them out of business.


42 posted on 06/13/2007 1:17:49 PM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black

He is suing as a citizen; his occupation is currently an administrative law judge.

At all other times he is an idiot.


43 posted on 06/13/2007 1:18:28 PM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

If in those pants was a small piece of paper with the number for your Swiss Bank account, wouldn’t you be upset?


44 posted on 06/13/2007 1:23:14 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GunsareOK

Can these people counter-sue to recoup all of their legal expenses PLUS? I would think the emotional distress on this couple could be grounds to counter-sue.


45 posted on 06/13/2007 1:23:30 PM PDT by KEmom (Please send viable Republican candidates to Massachusetts!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: moonman
"has to be a Liberal with a mental disorder" You want to re-think this statement? LOL

LOL, redundant and superfluous

46 posted on 06/13/2007 1:44:44 PM PDT by Moleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido; MotleyGirl70; Cagey; Mr. Brightside; RepoGirl

I don’t even know what to say. Just damn.


47 posted on 06/13/2007 2:23:10 PM PDT by lesser_satan (FRED THOMPSON '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

Most who serve as their own counsel have a fool for a client.

And an ass for counsel.


48 posted on 06/13/2007 2:38:44 PM PDT by Melpomene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle

Did they find you in a bathtub full of ice with your organs missing?


49 posted on 06/13/2007 2:41:20 PM PDT by Melpomene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: KEmom

They can countersue but it doesn’t sound like this guy has any money to speak of, and he’s about to be unemployed, and after all this publicity he’d be lucky to land a job bagging fried at McDonald’s. Suing him would just rack up more legal bills for them and leave them with a huge never-to-be-paid damage award. Frankly I think the couple has a better case to sue the District of Columbia for damages, for allowing this travesty to ever see the inside of a courtroom.


50 posted on 06/13/2007 2:45:39 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

This is something right out of Aqua Teen Hunger Force. It seems like something Master Shake would do.


51 posted on 06/13/2007 3:17:53 PM PDT by Duke Nukum (The World is Not Enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lesser_satan; Larry Lucido; MotleyGirl70; Cagey; Mr. Brightside
I think Gomez Addams said it best when he said, "Your honor, they say a man who represents himself has a fool for a client. Well, with God as my witness, I am that fool!"

Now... where did I leave my thinkin' pants...

52 posted on 06/13/2007 3:42:34 PM PDT by RepoGirl ("Tom, I'm getting dead from you, but I'm not getting Un-dead..." -- Frasier Crane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: RepoGirl; lesser_satan; MotleyGirl70; Cagey; Mr. Brightside

I posted about my love of those Cotton Dockers ads on a related thread. “Pants pants pants pants pants pants....”


53 posted on 06/13/2007 3:46:01 PM PDT by Larry Lucido (Duncan Hunter 2008 (or Fred Thompson if he ever makes up his mind))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle
"Try explaining that to your wife when you come home at 2 in the afternoon without pants, slurring your speech. And your kids."

You slurred your kids???? : - )

54 posted on 06/13/2007 5:39:45 PM PDT by jackibutterfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: River_Wrangler

“This Gentleman needs a swift kick in the pants.....oh, he doesn’t have them. Never mind.”

Yes, he does. But they have cuffs on them now.

He claims he doesn’t like cuffs.....so they must not be his pants.....thus the lawsuit.


55 posted on 06/13/2007 7:58:48 PM PDT by toldyou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

LOL!

Greta just interviewed the defense attorney.....

Greta: “He cried yesterday?”

Defense attorney (representing Korean dry cleaners): “Yes, he cried yesterday. Judge Pearson broke down on the stand yesterday.”

Greta: “This is costing the taxpayers a lot of money.”

Nuff said........


56 posted on 06/13/2007 8:04:31 PM PDT by toldyou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson